Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy yield from gasification of switchgrass did not decrease on a unit biomass basis.

Taxon: SwitchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome: Energy yield from gasificatione1
Qualifier: did not decrease on a unit biomass basise1

Verbatim

t0
“Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Switchgrass Harvested in Fall or Spring”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76

e1
“Energy yield from gasification did not decrease on a unit biomass basis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1100

Title

Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Switchgrass Harvested in Fall or Spring

Paul R. Adler; Matt A. Sanderson; Akwasi A. Boateng; et al. Agronomy Journal 2006. doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0351

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying all 224 kg N ha-1 through V15 did not decrease corn yield significantly.

Taxon: CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: Delaying application of all 224 kg N ha-1 through V15e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Corn yield following a delayed application of nitrogen”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54

e0
“Delaying application of all 224 kg N ha-1 through V15 did not decrease yield significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–785

Title

Corn yield following a delayed application of nitrogen

Brian H. Yoder Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) 2018

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect In corn following soybean, delaying the second half of N to as late as R2 did not cause significant yield loss.
Intervention effect Corn with N applied at R3 yielded 92% of the yield of corn with the second application at V3.
Intervention effect Delaying all 224 kg N ha-1 through V15 reduced corn yield with application at VT, R2 and R3 (12, 19 and 37% less).
Intervention effect In corn following corn, delaying the second half of N to R3 gave 96% of the yield of the second application at V3.
Intervention effect In corn following corn, none of the delayed N timings significantly lowered yield.
Intervention effect Delaying all N to V9 did not significantly decrease corn yield.
Intervention effect Delaying all N to V12 reduced corn yield by 11% relative to earlier timings.
Intervention effect Delaying all N to R3 reduced corn yield by 42%.
Recommendation Without N at planting, N must be applied by mid-vegetative stages to prevent corn yield loss.
Intervention effect When half the N was applied at planting, delaying application until past pollination caused surprisingly little corn yield loss.
Observation Split-N corn treatments recovered healthy leaf color (SPAD) no matter how late N was applied.
Intervention effect With no N at planting, corn plants could not regain full leaf color or yield if N was applied later than mid-vegetative stages.
Recommendation If all N is delayed, application should be made before plants reach mid-vegetative growth stages.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease seed yield per plant.

Taxon: mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]Vigna radiatat0
Treatment: basal 25% defoliatione0
Outcome: seed yield plant-1e0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840

t0
“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107

Title

Effect of defoliation on growth, reproductive characters and yield in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek].

Alam Mondal, Monjurul; Ali Fakir, Md Solaiman; Ismail, Mohd Razi; et al. Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) 2011

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Greater defoliation decreased leaf area and total dry matter production across seasons and genotypes.
Intervention effect Defoliation reduced source size and flower production.
Intervention effect Defoliation decreased flower production.
Intervention effect Defoliation lowered pod and seed yields.
Intervention effect Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease total dry matter.
Observation High yielding genotypes had greater compensation for source loss than low yielding genotypes.
Intervention effect Defoliation above 25% from either canopy position significantly reduced total dry matter and seed yield.
Intervention effect Top defoliation caused greater yield reduction than basal defoliation.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rizoplan can be used without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators.

Taxon: GRAPEVINEVitist0
Treatment: Rizoplane3
Outcome: biological efficiency and yield indicatorse3
Direction: decreasee3
Qualifier: without a significante3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“GRAPEVINE RESISTANCE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–78

e3
“The possibility of using Rizoplan without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators was established”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–661

Title

EVALUATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF BIOPREPARATION RIZOPLAN ON GRAPEVINE RESISTANCE TO OIDIUM

N.O. Arestova; I.O. Ryabchun Russian vine 2024. doi:10.32904/2712-8245-2024-30-8-12

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Rizoplan increased the vegetative mass of grapevine bushes compared to the control.
Intervention effect Rizoplan gave vine growth 1.2 times that of the control.
Intervention effect Rizoplan increased sugar content in grape berry juice by 5–6% compared to the control.
Intervention effect Rizoplan decreased grape acidity by 9–11% compared to the control.
Intervention effect Rizoplan improved the quality of the crop.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks did not decrease Spanish peanut yield.

Taxon: Spanish peanutsArachis hypogaea var. vulgarise1
Treatment: Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weekse1
Interactor: Horsenettlee1weed
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: did not decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks did not decrease the yield of Spanish peanuts”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390

Title

Interference of Horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) with Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea)

Neil M. Hackett; Don S. Murray; David L. Weeks Weed Science 1987. doi:10.1017/s0043174500079339

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reflective film did not alleviate the yield decrease associated with water deficit.

Taxon: Merlott0
Treatment: reflective filme0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not alleviate the decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The reflective film did not alleviate the decrease in yield or titratable acidity associated with water deficit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1058

t0
“Merlot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–117

Title

Foliar Reflective Film and Water Deficit Increase Anthocyanin to Soluble Solids Ratio during Berry Ripening in Merlot

Krista Shellie American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2015. doi:10.5344/ajev.2015.14121

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Reflective film increased the anthocyanin to soluble solids ratio under both irrigation regimes at 18 to 24% soluble solids.
Intervention effect Reflective film did not alleviate the titratable acidity decrease associated with water deficit.
Intervention effect Reflective film had no influence on yield per vine.
Intervention effect Reflective film reduced berries per cluster, especially under DI35 irrigation.
Association In DI90 vines, fewer berries per cluster were associated with greater berry fresh weight and anthocyanin content per berry.
Intervention effect Cluster removal affected berry composition at harvest only under DI35 irrigation.
Intervention effect DI35 irrigation produced a higher anthocyanin to soluble solids ratio during ripening than DI90 irrigation.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl addition five days before transplanting did not decrease yield.

Taxon: CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
Treatment: Addition of NaCl 5 days before transplantinge0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Addition of NaCl 5 days before transplanting did not decrease yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–822

t0
“Cabbage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122

Title

Ebb and Flow Irrigation and Addition of NaCl to Culture Solution Improve Quality and Reduce Labor Costs in Raising Cabbage Plug Seedlings.

Takahiro FUJIWARA; Hiroshi YOSHIOKA; Fumio SATO Japanese Journal of Farm Work Research 2001. doi:10.4035/jsfwr.36.153

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Ebb and flow irrigation required 20% less working time than mist irrigation.
Intervention effect Ebb and flow irrigation promoted seedling growth uniformity and post-transplant growth.
Intervention effect Adding 0.3% NaCl encouraged leaf greening and decreased flat plant appearance.
Intervention effect Early NaCl addition greatly depressed seedling growth.
Intervention effect NaCl-exposed plug seedlings acquired drought tolerance, indicated by water-use efficiency and electrolyte leakage testing.
Intervention effect Ebb and flow irrigation produced higher yield than mist irrigation.
Intervention effect Adding 0.3% NaCl five days before transplanting improved adaptation to an automatic transplanter.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardy, P with biofertilizers practically did not decrease barley yield.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: drug Hardy, P with biofertilizerse0
Outcome: yield of barleye0
Direction: practically does not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“with the combined use of the drug Hardy, P with biofertilizers, the yield of barley practically does not decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–753

Title

Features of barley crop formation when using morphoregulators and biofertilizers in various weather conditions

Timirâzevskaâ selʹskohozâjstvennaâ akademiâ; P. D. Bugaev International Scientific Conference 2021. doi:10.26897/978-5-9675-1855-3-2021-72