Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The disease causes a decrease in tobacco leaf yield.

Taxon: TobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
Outcome: tobacco leaf yielde1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

t0
“Causing Leaf Spot on Tobacco”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–75

e1
“The disease spreads widely and causes a decrease in tobacco leaf yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3314–3384

Title

First Report of Pestalotiopsis trachycarpicola Causing Leaf Spot on Tobacco in China

Weili Gang; Weijun Sang; Yi Cao; et al. Plant Disease 2025. doi:10.1094/pdis-05-25-1076-pdn

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocoa with cassava had a slight yield decrease.

Taxon: cocoaTheobroma cacaoe0
Treatment: cocoa/cassava combinatione0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“cocoa/cassava combination where there was a slight decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1589

Title

Long Term Assessment Of The Agronomic And Economic Benefits Of Cocoa Food Crop Intercropping In The Absence Of Fertilizer Application

Opoku-Ameyaw, K.; Oppong, F. K.; Acheampong, K.; et al. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2012. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8168

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Cocoa with plantain reduced seedling girth in year two.
Intervention effect Treatments did not significantly affect cocoa height.
Observation The four crop intercrop had the lowest soil N, P and K, without significance.
Intervention effect Intercropped cocoa yielded 28-60% more beans than sole cocoa, except cocoa with cassava.
Observation Intercropping was profitable.
Association Plantain and maize combinations produced higher net benefits.
Recommendation The authors recommend intercropping during establishment.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The UKMO scenario was unfavourable and showed a considerable yield decrease.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: UKMO scenarioe0

Verbatim

e0
“the UKMO scenario is not favorable, showing a considerable yield decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–909

e1
“rice, maize and wheat production in Japan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–124

Title

The Impacts of Climatic Warming on Cereal Crop Production in Japan.

Hiroshi SEINO Journal of Agricultural Meteorology 1995. doi:10.2480/agrmet.51.131

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Higher temperature decreased simulated cereal yields in many regions under current management.
Intervention effect Higher temperature shortened simulated cereal growing seasons in many regions.
Intervention effect Direct CO2 benefits may compensate for yield losses in central and northern Japan.
Intervention effect Direct CO2 benefits did not compensate for yield losses in Kyushu.
Association Simulated crop-yield changes varied greatly among GCM scenarios.
Observation The GISS scenario was generally favourable for Japanese crop production.
Observation Wheat production was vulnerable under every GCM climate-change scenario.
Intervention effect Earlier planting raised simulated yields under climate change in most cases.
Intervention effect Earlier planting did not improve simulated yields in Kyushu because of high temperature stress.
Recommendation Early planting and irrigation were proposed as adaptation strategies.
Recommendation New cultivars better adapted to climate change would be required in Kyushu.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Poor groundcover suppression may decrease maize grain yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: poor groundcover suppressione0
Outcome: maize grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“poor groundcover suppression may produce unfavorable environmental consequences and decrease maize grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1704

Title

Modeling perennial groundcover effects on annual maize grain crop growth with the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator

C. A. Bartel; S. V. Archontoulis; A. W. Lenssen; et al. Agronomy Journal 2020. doi:10.1002/agj2.20108

Other claims from this paper (10)

Method / resource The integrated model predicted maize aboveground biomass with 13–27% RRMSE.
Method / resource The model predicted groundcover tissue nitrogen concentration with 11–18% RRMSE.
Method / resource The calibrated model captured observed groundcover biomass trends.
Method / resource The calibrated model captured observed soil nitrate trends.
Mechanism Light competition was the primary groundcover-related maize yield penalty.
Association Water affected maize yield later in the growing season.
Association Nitrogen affected maize yield later in the growing season.
Association Effective groundcover suppression produced minimal maize yield loss.
Association Effective groundcover suppression produced significant environmental benefits.
Association Poor groundcover suppression may cause unfavorable environmental outcomes.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BO-1 had an 8% yield decrease.

Taxon: okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Material: BO-1e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 8e0

Verbatim

e0
“the minimum decrease in yield of 8 and 13% was recorded in BO-1 and Varsha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1241

t0
“okra”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37

Title

Morpho-physiological response of okra (Abelmoschus esculentum L.) genotypes to moisture stress during reproductive stage

R. M. Bhatt; N.K. Srinivasa Rao Indian Journal of Horticulture 2005

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Moisture stress reduced relative water content from 72–82% in irrigated plants to 66–75%.
Observation BO-1 had the maximum relative water content during stress.
Intervention effect Stress reduced leaf area across genotypes by 25–70%.
Observation Pusa Makhamali had the greatest reduction in photosynthesis under stress, followed by IIHR-1685 and Arka Anamika.
Observation BO-1 maintained photosynthesis at 11.5 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Varsha maintained photosynthesis at 9.7 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Arka Abhay maintained photosynthesis at 8.8 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Photosynthetic rate recovered significantly after stress release.
Intervention effect Further growth was considerably affected after stress release.
Intervention effect Moisture stress significantly decreased per-plant yield.
Observation IIHR-1685 had the greatest yield reduction.
Observation Varsha had a 13% yield decrease.

Intervention effectauthor interpretationreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Temperatures above optimum decrease cotton yield.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment: increase in temperatures above optimume0
Outcome: cotton yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: optimume0

Verbatim

e0
“In contrast, increase in temperatures above optimum decrease cotton yield due to increased boll abscission and smaller boll size.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–454

Title

Crop Responses to Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Interactions with Temperature

K. Raja Reddy; P. V. Vara Prasad; V. Gopal Kakani Journal of Crop Improvement 2005. doi:10.1300/j411v13n01_08

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton productivity.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton carbon exchange rates.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton boll number.
Intervention effect Temperatures above optimum increase cotton boll abscission.
Intervention effect Temperatures above optimum make cotton bolls smaller.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 did not ameliorate high temperature effects on reproductive growth.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 did not ameliorate high temperature effects on fiber quality.
Observation In future climates with warmer temperatures and elevated CO2, cotton yield will decrease.
Observation In future climates with warmer temperatures and elevated CO2, cotton quality will decrease.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier MPB initiation produced the greatest lint yield decrease.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: earlier initiation of MPB applicatione0
Outcome: lint yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Higher seasonal totals and earlier initiation of MPB application resulted in the greatest decrease in lint yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1391

t0
“Cotton”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32

Title

Differential Responses of Cotton Cultivars when Applying Mepiquat Pentaborate

Nathan B. O'Berry; Joel C. Faircloth; Michael A. Jones; et al. Agronomy Journal 2009. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0333

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect FM 960 BR July height fell 25% with MPB in South Carolina in 2006.
Intervention effect DP 444 BG/RR July height fell 12% with MPB.
Intervention effect DP 555 BG/RR July height fell 13% with MPB.
Observation Actual height reductions did not differ among cultivars.
Intervention effect MPB reduced harvest height by 8 to 34%.
Intervention effect MPB reduced height-to-node ratio by 10 to 32%.
Intervention effect MPB enhanced maturity across cultivars.
Intervention effect MPB reduced lint yield by 3.7 to 8.5%.
Association Higher seasonal MPB totals produced the greatest lint yield decrease.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily sprinkle irrigation tended to decrease pepper yield.

Taxon: Pepper plantst0
Treatment: sprinkle irrigated dailye0
Outcome: Yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Yield tended to decrease when the plants were sprinkle irrigated daily.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–434

t0
“Pepper plants ( Capsicum annuum L. cv. California Wonder)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–66

Title

Sprinkle and Trickle Irrigation of Green Pepper in an Arid Zone1

D. Goldberg; M. Shmueli HortScience 1971. doi:10.21273/hortsci.6.6.559

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Trickle irrigation gave greater pepper yield, leaf growth, and root development than sprinkle irrigation.
Intervention effect Irrigation frequency had a slight but nonsignificant effect.
Intervention effect Trickle irrigation every 5 days tended to reduce pepper yield.
Intervention effect Sprinkling increased leaf chloride content, especially with frequent irrigation.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reasons for the decrease in barley yield under permanent sowing were identified.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree5
Outcome: decrease in the yield of permanent sowing of barleye5

Verbatim

e5
“The reasons for the decrease in the yield of permanent sowing of barley have been identified”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1731

Title

The impact of abiotic and key environmental factors on barley yield

Dmitry Vladmirovich Mitrofanov The Agrarian Scientific Journal 2023. doi:10.28983/asj.y2023i9pp15-21

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The grain yield decrease in Ant-Pop was insignificant.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Ant-Pope0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in the grain yield of Ant-Pop cultivar was insignificiant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–606

t0
“Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66

Title

The Effect of Cutting Use Above The Part of Above The Ear in Maize as Forage on Grain Yield and Development

Mehmet Bilgen; Sadık Çakmakçi DergiPark (Istanbul University) 1999

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Removing the portion above the ear reduced maize grain yield by 2.2 to 18.3%.
Intervention effect Cutting yielded 358.78 to 898.12 kg/da of forage.
Observation Tüm 82-6 had the greatest grain yield losses after fertilization and at milk stage.
Observation Ant-90 had the greatest grain yield losses after fertilization and at milk stage.
Intervention effect Cutting after fertilization caused greater grain yield reduction.
Intervention effect Cutting at milk stage caused greater grain yield reduction.
Observation Cutting after fertilization and at milk stage supplied more forage and better forage quality.
Intervention effect Grain yield loss from cutting at hard dough stage was insignificant.
Observation Forage from cutting at hard dough stage had low quality due to over ripeness.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics