Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing solution volume to 60 l m-2 did not negatively affect yield.

Treatment
Reduction of the volume of the solution to 60 l m-2 of cultivated areae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of the volume of the solution to 60 l m-2 of cultivated area induced a decrease in nitrate accumulation without negative effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1150
e1

“spinach was grown in summer and autumn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–440

Title

Growing spinach in a floating system with different volumes of aerated or non-aerated nutrient solution

Lenzi, A.; Baldi, A.; Tesi, R. Florence Research (University of Florence) 2019. doi:10.13128/ahs-12780

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rennan retained protein content at 13.0% under drought.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Rennane0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
PCe0
Direction
retainede0
Value
13.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Rennan showed decrease of yield in drought (from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha), but retained PC (13.0%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1081
t0

“drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–93

Title

Influence of drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Marijana Barić; Snježana Kereša; Hrvoje Šarčević; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (18)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other cultivar combinations showed no statistically significant change in grain yield

Treatment
combinationse3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mixtures composed of five wheat cultivars, Jingshuang 16, Jing 411, Jingdong 8, Lunxuan 987, and Baofeng 104”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108
e3

“The differences of the increases or decreases were not statistically significant except combinations Jing 411: Jingdong 8: Baofeng104, Jingshuang16: Jingdong8: Lunxuang 987 and Jingshuang 16: Jingdong 8: Lunxuan 987: Baofeng 104, which showed the decrease of the grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1142

Title

The Effect of Wheat Mixtures on the Powdery Mildew Disease and Some Yield Components

Ning LI; Shao-feng JIA; Xiu-na WANG; et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2012. doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(12)60048-3

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of M. brunneum and 3-octanone had no effect on potato yield.

Treatment
Combinations of M. brunneum and 3-octanonee2
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
no effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Wireworm-Infested Potato Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–149
e2

“Combinations of M. brunneum and 3-octanone were also found to significantly decrease wireworm damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1308
e3

“while no effect on yield was reported, resulting in an increased saleable mass over controls (p < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1426

Title

Evaluation of Metarhizium brunneum- and Metarhizium-Derived VOCs as Dual-Active Biostimulants and Pest Repellents in a Wireworm-Infested Potato Field

Martyn J. Wood; Alexandra M. Kortsinoglou; James C. Bull; et al. Journal of Fungi 2023. doi:10.3390/jof9060599

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year converted plots did not differ significantly from continued sowing plots in growth and yield.

Treatment
second year plots after converted from transplanting culturee0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
continued direct sowing plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences in the growth and yield of direct sowing rice could be found between the second year plots after converted from transplanting culture and the continued direct sowing plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1007

Title

The Alternation of Direct Sowing and Transplanting as a Counterplan for the Rice Yield Decrease due to Continuance of Direct Sowing Culture

Yoshimasa UEMURA; Akira MIYASAKA Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1977. doi:10.1626/jcs.46.414

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen left grain quality unaffected.

Treatment
Reducing N fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain qualitye0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing N fertilization resulted in a yield decrease of approximately 20%, while grain quality remained unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1229
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–128

Title

Reduced nitrogen fertilization combined with microbial bio-inputs restores soil bacterial functional profiles and sustains wheat performance

Audrey Pecourt; Audrey Bertrand; Manuella Catterou; et al. The Science of The Total Environment 2026. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181886

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA-deficient wilty pea stomatal conductance did not respond to liming.

Material
wiltye0
Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
g(s)e0
Direction
unresponsivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“g(s) of the ABA-deficient mutant pea wilty was unresponsive to liming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1423

Title

Liming can decrease legume crop yield and leaf gas exchange by enhancing root to shoot ABA signalling

Shane A. Rothwell; E. David Elphinstone; Ian C. Dodd Journal of Experimental Botany 2015. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv042

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol use did not significantly change soybean grain yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
use of methanole4
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
no significant differencee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“To investigate the effects of methanol on the yield and growth of soybean (Glysine max L.) in different conditions of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128
e4

“on the one hand increase in photosynthesis and dry matter production and the other hand relative accelerated flowering phase due to the use of methanol lead to decrease in remobilization time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1134
e5

“therefore no significant difference was observed in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1199

Title

Effects of methanol on the yield and growth of soybean in different irrigation conditions

International Journal of Biosciences (IJB) 2014. doi:10.12692/ijb/4.8.160-168

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up to 50% leaf removal did not change Hamlin yield, fruit number or fruit size.

Taxon
oranget0
Material
Hamline0
Treatment
removal of up to 50% of the leavese0
Outcome
fruit yield, fruit number, fruit sizee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In `Hamlin', removal of up to 50% of the leaves in late November had no effect on fruit yield, fruit number, fruit size, soluble solids yield, juice °Brix, and °Brix to acid ratio of juice the following year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–483
t0

“Orange Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87

Title

Partial Defoliation Can Decrease Average Leaf Size but Has Little Effect on Orange Tree Growth, Fruit Yield and Juice Quality

Rongcai Yuan; Fernando Alferez; Igor Kostenyuk; et al. HortScience 2005. doi:10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2011

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress applied this way did not reduce leaf lettuce yield.

Taxon
Leaf lettucee0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
without reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) was grown hydroponically and subjected to rhizosphere drought stress by lowering the water level in the solution tub before harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–519
e1

“Appropriate drought stress using this method could increase AsA, polyphenol, and sugar content by 24%, 50%, and 17%, respectively, and decrease nitrate nitrogen content by 18% without reducing yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–719

Title

Augmentation of Antioxidant Constituents by Drought Stress to Roots in Leafy Vegetables

Ryohei Koyama; Hiromichi Itoh; Syuji Kimura; et al. HortTechnology 2012. doi:10.21273/horttech.22.1.121

Other claims from this paper (6)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.