View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
SAP application did not reduce fertilizer leaching rates in the deep-draining water and did not change soil pH.
Treatmentapplication of SAP e4 Outcomefertilizer leaching rates e4 Qualifierchanges in soil pH e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “the application of SAP enhanced the sugarcane yield only under a 10-day irrigation interval ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1078 e4 “the current study did not evident a decrease in fertilizer leaching rates in the deep-draining water or changes in soil pH due to the application of SAP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1682 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The second application level left bulk density unchanged.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in bulk density was observed, to first and third level. With percent of decrease 15% and 10% respectively. In the seam time. The second level no change was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–972 t0 “THE EFFECT OF USING THE SHENBLAN PLANT AS A SOIL CONDITIONER IN SOME SOIL PROPERTIES AND YIELD OF PEA CERATOPHLAM DEMERESM L. UNDER THE RAIN CIRCUMSTANCE OF RAMADI CITY. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–169 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decline under the water table treatments was unrelated to the number of effective heads.
Treatmentwater table treatments e1 Outcomenumber of effective heads e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “the yield decline of those water table treatments was due to significant decrease in 1000-grain weight and grain number per ear ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–859 e2 “was unrelated with the number of effective heads ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–912 t0 “Effects of Water Table during Grain Filling on Wheat Yield and Its Component ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Saline mineral water did not change lettuce yield in lettuce.
TreatmentSaline mineral water e0 Directiondid not affect changes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Saline mineral water did not affect changes of lettuce yield , nor content of phosphorus, potassium, sodium, vitamin C, P-carotene and chlorophyll, but it led to the decrease of nitrogen content (especially of nitrite form) and the increase of magnesium, sulphur and chlorine. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–674 t0 “LETTUCE (LACTUCA SATIVA L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–50 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
After a period of adaptation, RDI Concord vines had the same yield as the control.
Qualifierafter a period of adaptation e2 Verbatim
e1 “juice grape (Vitis labruscana Bailey) production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–337 e2 “reducing water in the 'Concord' grapes resulted in a significant decrease in yield , but after a period of adaptation, the yield of the RDI vines was the same as the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1806 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing hairy vetch 40 days after cabbage planting did not affect cabbage yield .
Treatment40 days after planting e0 Outcomeyield of Chinese cabbage e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “proper sowing times that had no influence on the yield of Chinese cabbage were 30 and 40 days after planting while other sowing times led to decrease the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–611 t0 “Hairy Vetch ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The improved 9311 carrying the japonica haplotype showed no penalty on yield .
Qualifierno penalty on yield e2 Verbatim
t0 “low-cadmium accumulating indica rice variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–110 e2 “The improved 9311 carrying the OsHMA3 - OsNramp5 - OsNramp1 jap haplotype with recurrent parent genome recovery of up to 91.6% resulted in approximately 31.8% decrease in Cd accumulation in the grain and with no penalty on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–888 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Different yield s had little impact on leaf diseases of grape.
Treatmentdifferent yields e6 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “with the decrease of yield , the reducing sugar content of grape increased ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 312–384 e6 “different yield s have a significant impact on the fruit diseases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–990 e7 “have little impact on the leaf diseases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1034 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Two cuts per year did not affect plant survival.
Taxonpearl millet ✕ elephantgrass t0 TreatmentTwo cuts per year e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Two cuts per year (mid‐June and early August) did not decrease seed yield and seed quality significantly, nor did they affect plant survival ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1356 t0 “pearl millet ✕ elephantgrass ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–77 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat stress did not significantly reduce days to 50% flowering.
Outcomenumber of days required for flowering of 50 % of plants e0 DirectionNo significant decrease e0 Settingconditions of heat stress e0 Verbatim
e0 “No significant decrease on the number of days required for flowering of 50 % of plants under conditions of heat stress were recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2240–2372 t0 “TOMATO PLANTS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–181 Other claims from this paper (19) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.