View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit reduced yield per plant of wheat significantly, with a decrease in leaf area and net photosynthetic rate.
with a decrease in leaf area and net photosynthetic rate e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Water deficit reduced yield per plant significantly with a decrease in leaf area and net photosynthetic rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1345 t0 “wheat genotypes in response to water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–107 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative yield decrease , berry quality parameters and quality index had significant linear relationships with seasonal evapotranspiration deficit.
relative seasonal ET deficit e0 relative decrease in yield, berry quality parameters, Q c e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Significant linear functions were found between a relative decrease in yield , berry quality parameters, Q c and a relative seasonal ET deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–968 t0 “table grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–160 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel yield of maize was significantly lower at 0.75 m row spacing, with a decrease of 8.09%.
spacings of 0.75 e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “row spacings of maize (Zea mais L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–542 e2 “significantly lower yield s were recorded with spacings of 0.75 and 1 m, with a decrease of 8.09% and 18.24%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1119 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield differed significantly between upland and middle land, with a reported 14.09% decrease .
upland and middle land e0 Verbatim
e0 “Difference of yield decrease s between upland and middle land is significant (14.09%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–967 t0 “WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–28 Other claims from this paper (2) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in MNAR after densification is attributed as the cause of a significant decrease in grains per ear.
平均净同化率(MNAR)降低 e0 Verbatim
t0 “Spring Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 e0 “增密后平均净同化率(MNAR)降低导致穗粒数显著降低 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–603 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation Ear number and grains per ear are the main factors determining population yield above 15 t per hm2 in high-yield spring maize. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has an ear number of (7.08-9.60)x10^4 ears. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has 477-654 grains per ear. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has a thousand-grain weight of 324.7-388.7 g. Observation The yield structure for populations above 15 t per hm2 has a grain weight per ear of 168.9-234.0 g. Observation A reasonable population structure has LAImax above 6.5. Observation A reasonable population structure has mean LAI of about 5. Observation A reasonable population structure has LAI at harvest above 3.5. Recommendation The ideal yield structure for tall large-ear cultivars is 67,500-75,000 ears per hm2, 610-640 grains per ear, thousand-grain weight about 380 g, 220-240 g grain weight per ear and yield above 15 t per hm2. Recommendation The ideal yield structure for medium-height small-to-medium-ear cultivars is 75,000-97,500 ears per hm2, 520-600 grains per ear, thousand-grain weight 340-355 g, 180-220 g grain weight per ear and yield above 16.5 t per hm2. Intervention effect Increased planting density increased mean crop growth rate and total grain number per unit area. Intervention effect Increased planting density thereby raised yield. Intervention effect After densification, mean net assimilation rate (MNAR) decreased. Mechanism Structural potential tapping mainly through densification, where population gains exceed the loss in individual performance, achieves high yield above 15 t per hm2 (gain-loss compensation yield increase). Recommendation The authors identify functional potential tapping, giving combined gain in population structure and individual function (differential compensation yield increase), as an important route to further raise yield. Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
2030 and 2050 scenarios projected a small but significant yield decrease for willow.
Verbatim
e0 “The simulations for climate change scenarios for 2030 and 2050 showed a rather small but significant decrease in the yield level of willow and miscanthus in Poland, and a significant change in the potential C sequestration and reductions in the nitrous oxide emission level. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1730 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
2030 and 2050 scenarios projected a small but significant yield decrease for miscanthus.
Verbatim
e0 “The simulations for climate change scenarios for 2030 and 2050 showed a rather small but significant decrease in the yield level of willow and miscanthus in Poland, and a significant change in the potential C sequestration and reductions in the nitrous oxide emission level. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1730 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosystem II quantum yield under drought was significantly measured in all leaf zones.
all leaf zones e6 drought stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–119 e0 “measuring chlorophyll fluorescence related to drought stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–652 e6 “Decrease in ${\Phi}PSII$ could was significantly measured in all leaf zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1636 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel yield of maize was significantly lower at 1 m row spacing, with a decrease of 18.24%.
spacings of 0.75 and 1 m e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “row spacings of maize (Zea mais L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–542 e2 “significantly lower yield s were recorded with spacings of 0.75 and 1 m, with a decrease of 8.09% and 18.24%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1119 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
An increase in plant density led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant
increase in PD e1 inflorescence yield per plant e1 linear decrease e1 greenhouse experiments e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “medicinal cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–188 e1 “An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (p = 0.02) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–802 e2 “We conducted two greenhouse experiments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–305 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Zea mays
Salix
Miscanthus
Capsicum annuum
Cannabis sativa