View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Pattern B showed no significant yield increase or decrease .
Directionno significant yield increasing or decreasing trend e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–123 e0 “there was no significant yield increasing or decreasing trend ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1847 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The increased latex yield did not significantly decrease tree growth over three years.
Treatmentincrease of latex yield e0 Directiondid not result in a significant decrease e0 Qualifierover a period of three years e0 Verbatim
t0 “Hevea brasiliensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 e0 “The increase of latex yield did not result in a significant decrease in the growth of trees over a period of three years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–645 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Liquid manure substituted for commercial fertilizer without a significant decrease in soy-sorghum dry matter yield per acre.
Outcomesoy-sorghum DM yield per acre e0 Directionwithout a significant decrease e0 Comparatorcommercial fertilizer e0 Verbatim
e0 “Liquid manure may be substituted for commercial fertilizer without a significant decrease in soy-sorghum DM yield per acre ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–405 e1 “Soybeans interseeded with grain sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain- yield prediction accuracy.
Outcomeprediction accuracy for grain yield e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Comparatorwhole SNP dataset e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840 e1 “chickpea breeding lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 90000 plants/hm2, cane yield did not decrease remarkably relative to 105000 plants/hm2.
Treatment90000 plants/hm2 e0 Comparator105000 plants/hm2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Treatment with 90000 plants/hm2 showed no remarkable cane yield decrease compared with density of 105000 plants/hm2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–786 t0 “Guitang 30 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
R453 grain yield tended to decrease with increased soil nitrogen.
Treatmentnitrogen availability was increased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “R453 genotype did not show significant differences under varying nitrogen availability and exhibited a tendency to decrease grain yield when nitrogen availability was increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1689 t0 “Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shendao 4 grain yield did not decrease significantly versus control.
Outcomeyields of grains e0 Directiondidn’t decrease e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “the yield s of grains and the biomasses of aboveground of Shendao 4 didn’t decrease significantly compared to the control (p<0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1033 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Total dry matter yield of forage, including weeds, did not decrease significantly with stand age.
Treatmentage of alfalfa stand e4 OutcomeTotal dry matter yield of forage e4 Directiondid not decrease e4 Verbatim
e0 “Iroquois alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) was seeded every spring from 1978 to 1988 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 e4 “Total dry matter yield of forage, including weeds, did not decrease significantly with age of alfalfa stand ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–665 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving organic fertilizer did not significantly decrease tomato yield versus conventional management.
Treatmentthe half amount of organic fertilizer inputs e0 Comparatorlocal farmers' conventional management of water and fertilizer e0 Verbatim
e0 “compared with local farmers' conventional management of water and fertilizer,the half amount of organic fertilizer inputs would not significantly decrease the yield of tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–541 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Decision support systems gave no significant yield decrease compared with the stage-oriented standard system
Directionno significant decrease e0 Comparatorstage-oriented standard system e0 Verbatim
t0 “Fungicides in Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–84 e0 “Compared to a stage-oriented standard system, no significant decrease in yield was observed in both cultivars, despite up to a 50% reduction in fungicide use through the use of DSSs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1228 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.