View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant differences in the amount and composition of soil inorganic nitrogen were found among the second-year, third-year and long-term plots.
second year plot, third year plot e5 amount of inorganic nitrogen and its composition e5 Verbatim
t0 “Rice Yield Decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44 e5 “However there were no significant differences among the second year plot, third year plot and the long term plot, in relation to the amount of inorganic nitrogen and its composition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1457 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil pH between 5.3 and 6.6 did not change tipburn incidence.
soil pH from 5.3 to 6.6 e0 leaf tipburn incidence e0 did not increase or decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a range of soil pH from 5.3 to 6.6 did not increase or decrease leaf tipburn incidence, nutrient uptake or total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1168 t0 “cabbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Split nitrogen application did not improve residual soil NO − 3 ‐N concentrations relative to a single application.
Split‐N applications e0 residual soil NO − 3 ‐N concentrations e0 respective single rate N applications e0 Verbatim
e0 “Split‐N applications compared to respective single rate N applications did not increase DM yield s, improve forage quality, or decrease residual soil NO − 3 ‐N concentrations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1247 t0 “Forage Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application beyond the optimal N rate did not consistently increase maize grain yield .
Nitrogen application beyond the optimal N rate e0 did not consistently increase e0 optimal N rate e0 Verbatim
t0 “Maize Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies in Northeast China ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–87 e0 “Nitrogen application beyond the optimal N rate did not consistently increase grain yield , and caused a decrease in NUEs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1085 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield was maintained with the technology intervention.
Internet of Things (IoT) and data-driven solutions e1 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results revealed a 21% reduction in water use and an 18% decrease in fertilizer application with no loss in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1202 e1 “exploring how Internet of Things (IoT) and data-driven solutions could optimize input use ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–324 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen reduction by 50 % had almost no effect on the efficiency coefficient Kef of winter wheat.
nitrogen decrease by 50 % (118 kg/ha) e1 efficiency coefficient of use of incurred costs Kef e1 no_change inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Determining the dependence of the Poliska-90 winter wheat yield on the ways of soil cultivation and mineral fertilizer application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–139 e1 “nitrogen decrease by 50 % (118 kg/ha) has almost no effect on the efficiency coefficient of use of incurred costs Kef ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1098 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Rice chaff application did not decrease total N content of rice plants in sandy loam soil
no_change inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The total N content of the plants was decrease d in the clay loam soil but not in the sandy loam soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1129 e1 “Rice plants (Oryza sativa L. cv. Hatsushimo) were grown in pots filled with the soils as treated above ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–816 e2 “Application of rice chaffs had little effect on plant height, but slightly increased the number of tillers per pot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1027 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation did not consistently increase Trifolium yield .
Rhizobium inoculatione6 did not consistently increase e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Trifolium repens was sampled from 10 areas
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 e6 “Rhizobium inoculation did not consistently increase Trifolium yield ; it actually caused a decrease in yield when in mixture with Lolium ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1319 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The positive effects of post-spray irrigation on stem rot control and yield were minimal.
post-spray irrigation e0 positive effects on stem rot control and yield e0 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the positive effects on stem rot control and yield were minimal with post-spray irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–1989 t0 “Implications of fungicide application timing and post-spray irrigation on disease control and peanut yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Wider rows did not change other yield parameters.
Increasing row width from 1.8 to 3.6 m e0 other yield parameters e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing row width from 1.8 to 3.6 m resulted in a slight but significant decrease in number of fruit per hectare with no effect on other yield parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–632 t0 “Plant Population Affects Yield and Fruit Size of Pumpkin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativat0
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Zea mays
Triticum aestivum
Trifolium
Rhizobium
Arachis hypogaea