View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The Metalosate potassium foliar fertilizer did not show the acid phosphatase decrease .
TreatmentMetalosate potassium foliar fertilizer e5 Outcomeacid phosphatase activity (PAC) e4 Comparatorfoliar fertilizers and bio-stimulants e4 Verbatim
e4 “Analysis of the results of the acid phosphatase activity (PAC) shows that during the entire white lupine growing season the foliar fertilizers and bio-stimulants decrease d the activity of this enzyme ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1214 e5 “This effect was not observed when the Metalosate potassium foliar fertilizer was applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1304 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was not significantly affected by plant density.
TaxonTRITICALE AND GLENLEA WHEAT t0 Treatmentincreased plant density e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Although grain yield was not significantly affected, 1000-kernel weight, kernel number per spike, and number of fertile spikes per plant exhibited a highly significant linear decrease with increased plant density. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–659 t0 “TRITICALE AND GLENLEA WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–93 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation depths did not affect quantum yield , photochemical quenching, or non-photochemical quenching.
Treatmentirrigation depths e0 OutcomeQuantum yield of photosystem II (Yield), photochemical quenching (qP), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) e0 Directionnot influenced e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Quantum yield of photosystem II ( Yield ), photochemical quenching (qP), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) and chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio (RFd) were not influenced by irrigation depths. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1002 t0 “pineapple plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield did not show that decline.
Treatmentmulti-annual unfertilized plots e0 Verbatim
e0 “Wheat ( triticum aestivum L.) and barley ( hordeum vulgare L.) showed strong yield declines from annual to multi-annual unfertilized plots, for maize ( zea mays L.), this yield decrease was not observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–727 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index did not change as seed yield increased with aerial biomass.
Directionwithout any change e0 Comparatoraerial biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “Seed yield greatly increased as aerial biomass increased without any change in harvest index, but there was a significant decrease in fertility index. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–2096 t0 “orchardgrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphuric acid did not lower eyespot-positive straw below unsprayed plots.
TreatmentSulphuric acid e1 Outcomepercentage of straws with eyespot e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Comparatorunsprayed plots e0 Verbatim
e0 “did not decrease the percentage of straws with eyespot below that in unsprayed plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1769 e1 “Sulphuric acid sprayed in 1953 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1532 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–127 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Mixed seeding did not significantly increase dry matter yield .
Treatmentwheat, triticale and oat e1 Outcomedry matter yield e0 Directionnot significantly increased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the dry matter yield were not significantly increased because of the low percentage of dry matter and the decrease of barley's growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1314 e1 “between barley and wheat, triticale and oat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–892 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis per leaf area remained constant.
Qualifieron a leaf area basis e0 Verbatim
e0 “keeping photosynthesis constant on a leaf area basis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1493 t0 “switchgrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Most herbicides did not affect yield at the end of vegetation.
Treatmentapplied herbicides e0 Directionwithout affecting e0 Qualifierat the end of vegetation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Most of the applied herbicides expressed temporary stress, evidenced by a decrease in the fresh matter of the shoots, without affecting of yield at the end of vegetation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1292 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The translocation showed no difference in grain yield of Saratovskaya 70 analogue lines in 2021
MaterialSaratovskaya 70 ALs e4 Treatment7DL-7Ae#1L·7Ae#1S e1 Directionno_change inferred e4 Comparatorcultivar-recipient e5 Verbatim
e0 “spring bread wheat cultivars Saratovskaya 68 and Saratovskaya 70 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–385 e1 “7DL-7Ae#1L·7Ae#1S in Saratovskaya 68 ALs reduced grain productivity in all years of research ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–713 e4 “In Saratovskaya 70 ALs, there was a decrease in grain yield in 2019 and 2020, and there were no differences in 2021 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–956 e5 “On average, the decrease was 18 and 32 %, or in absolute f igures 1101 and 912 against 1342 kg/ha in the cultivar-recipient ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1081 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.