View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing did not influence cultivar performance.
Outcomecultivar performance e0 Directiondid not influence e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “row spacing did not influence cultivar performance. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–357 t0 “Barley Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–90 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Melinis minutiflora caused no recorded sugarcane yield loss in adjacent rows.
TreatmentM. minutiflora e0 Outcomesugarcane yield loss e0 Directionno competition e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no competition was recorded between M. minutiflora and adjacent sugarcane rows in terms of sugarcane yield loss ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–593 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At 200 kg N ha –1, cover crops did not affect maize yield .
Qualifier200 kg N ha –1 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Maize yield was not affected by cover crops with 200 kg N ha –1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1091 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
With a 50% mineral nutrition reduction, microbiological fertilizers did not increase spring wheat grain yield relative to control.
Treatmentdecrease of mineral nutrition by 30% and 50% e0 Directiondid not contribute to increase e0 Verbatim
e0 “With decrease of mineral nutrition by 30% and 50% compared to the control, the application of microbiological fertilizers did not contribute to increase of grain yield s of spring wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1168 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment 2 did not significantly lower DM production relative to Treatment 1.
Taxonryegrass/clover pasture e1 Directiondid not show a significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared with Treatment 1, Treatment 2 did not show a significant decrease in DM production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–703 e1 “The growth of ryegrass/clover pasture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–46 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
PGR application did not change wheat grain yield .
TreatmentPGR application e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “assess the effects of PGR on wheat varieties exposed to different levels of N fertilization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–445 e5 “Despite its effect of reducing plant height, grain yield was unaffected by PGR application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1343 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional supplemental irrigations would not increase grain yield greatly in winter wheat.
Treatmentadditional supplemental irrigations e0 Directionwould not increase e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “additional supplemental irrigations would not increase grain yield greatly but decrease WUE of winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2389–2496 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pt2 plants had similar grain yield to controls.
Verbatim
e0 “com-pared with the control: slight inc.rease of the number panicles, slight decrease of the number of spikelets per panlcle and similar grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–857 t0 “rice plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–94 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
SSNM maintained grain yield relative to farmers' fertilizer practice.
Directionwithout any sacrifice e0 Comparatorfarmers' fertilizer practice e0 Verbatim
e0 “SSNM could decrease N rate to a greater extent without any sacrifice in grain yield ,when compared with farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–307 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
After four cycles of selection in all three populations, variability for the selected and non-selected traits did not decrease in soybean.
Materialall three populations e6 Outcomevariability for the selected traits and the non-selected traits e6 Qualifierafter four cycle of selection in all three populations e6 Verbatim
e0 “Four cycles of recurrent selection for early maturity, high seed yield , and high percent seed protein in soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–112 e6 “There were no decrease s in variability for the selected traits and the non-selected traits after four cycle of selection in all three populations. Random mating occurred in the intermating stage in all populations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2023–2236 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.