Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With a 30% mineral nutrition reduction, microbiological fertilizers did not increase spring wheat grain yield relative to control.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: decrease of mineral nutrition by 30%e0
Outcome: grain yieldse0
Direction: did not contribute to increasee0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“With decrease of mineral nutrition by 30% and 50% compared to the control, the application of microbiological fertilizers did not contribute to increase of grain yields of spring wheat.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1168

Title

CHANGES IN AGROCHEMICAL SOIL PROPERTIES AND SPRING WHEAT YIELDS WITH REDUCED APPLICATION RATES OF MINERAL FERTILIZERS AND APPLICATION OF AZOFIT N AND AZOFIT P FERTILIZERS

Svetlana Zhandarova; Vladimir Belyaev; Olga Cherepanova; et al. Vestnik Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta 2024. doi:10.53083/1996-4277-2024-231-1-56-63

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Azofit fertilizers with reduced mineral fertilizer rates enhanced soil microorganism activity.
Intervention effect The fertilizer regime mobilized soil nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.
Intervention effect The fertilizer regime improved nutrient availability for plants.
Intervention effect A 15% reduction in mineral fertilizer with Azofit N and Azofit P gave the highest spring wheat grain yields across fertility areas.
Intervention effect With a 50% mineral nutrition reduction, microbiological fertilizers did not increase spring wheat grain yield relative to control.
Association High fertility variants had the highest grain yields under control, 15% and 30% reduced nutrition.
Association Spring wheat yield depended more closely on mobile phosphorus and potassium content at season end.
Association Spring wheat grain yield depended significantly on soil humus content.
Mechanism Soil organic matter content significantly affected soil fertility and yield formation.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity did not significantly reduce chickpea dry biomass.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: dry biomasse0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Comparator: control plantse2

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity did not significantly decrease the dry biomass of the plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–701

e1
“grain yield (GY) of chickpea (cv. Flip 84-79C) growing under salinity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–462

e2
“salinity significantly reduced GY (−20%) and nodulation traits compared to the control plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–888

Title

Interactive effects of salinity and two phosphorus fertilizers on growth and grain yield of Cicer arietinum L. Section B Soil and plant science

H. Sadji-Ait Kaci; A. Chaker-Haddadj; Fatiha Aïd Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 2017

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Salinity affected relative shoot growth more than control and phosphorus treatments.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced chickpea grain yield by 20%.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly reduced nodulation traits.
Association Protein and leghemoglobin levels were inversely related to increasing salt concentration.
Association MDA content was inversely related to increasing salt concentration.
Association K/Na ratio was inversely related to increasing salt concentration.
Intervention effect Two phosphorus levels improved plant growing conditions in saline soil.
Intervention effect Under salinity, 90 kg phosphorus fertilizer increased leghemoglobin by 92%.
Intervention effect Under salinity, 90 kg phosphorus fertilizer reduced proline by 69%.
Intervention effect Under salinity, 90 kg phosphorus fertilizer protected membranes from peroxidation.
Intervention effect Both phosphorus doses combined with salinity increased grain yield by about 30%.
Intervention effect Low phosphorus under salinity produced responses similar to, and sometimes better than, controls.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased abscission under high phosphorus did not reduce overall cotton lint yield.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume2
Treatment: high-phosphorus regimese2
Outcome: overall cotton lint yielde2
Direction: no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“increased levels of abscission under high-phosphorus regimes did not translate into a decrease in overall cotton lint yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1112

Title

Plant responses to insect herbivore damage are modulated by phosphorus nutrition

Andrew A. Forbes; Jay A. Rosenheim Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01125.x

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition did not significantly reduce seed yield in 2004.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment: competitione0
Outcome: Seed yielde0
Qualifier: 2004e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Seed yield showed a significant decrease in response to competition in 2005 (F2,44 = 56.82, P < 0.0001), but not in 2004”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1234

e1
“soybean seeds”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–831

Title

Impact of interspecific competition on seed development and quality of five soybean cultivars

Katherine Millar; David J. Gibson; Bryan G. Young; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2007. doi:10.1071/ea07034

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Seed parameters often showed similar significant trends across both years.
Intervention effect Higher weed competition increased seed protein by 0.7 to 1%.
Association Protein showed a significant competition-by-cultivar interaction in 2005.
Intervention effect Seed oil tended to decline by less than 1% annually under higher competition.
Intervention effect Competition significantly reduced seed yield in 2005.
Intervention effect Competition significantly reduced seeds per plant in 2004.
Intervention effect Competition significantly reduced seeds per plant in 2005.
Intervention effect Aborted pods were more numerous under low and medium competition in 2004.
Intervention effect The higher aborted-pod trend was evident in 2005 without stated significance.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop termination date did not affect maize yield response to fertilizer nitrogen.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Cover crop termination datee0
Outcome: yield response to fertilizer‐Ne0
Direction: did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Cover crop termination date did not affect yield response to fertilizer‐N”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1330

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88

Title

Cover crop species can increase or decrease the fertilizer‐nitrogen requirement in maize

W. D. Carciochi; I. Massigoge; A. Lapaz Olveira; et al. Agronomy Journal 2021. doi:10.1002/agj2.20791

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation The minimum nitrogen rate maximizing grain yield was 100 kg N ha –1 after vetch–oat, higher than 50 kg N ha –1 after vetch.
Intervention effect At 200 kg N ha –1, cover crops did not affect maize yield.
Intervention effect Late vetch–oat termination reduced maize yield by 15% versus early termination.
Intervention effect Vetch termination date had no effect on maize yield.
Method / resource Relative chlorophyll meter readings at silking were useful for diagnosing maize nitrogen status and cover crop effects.
Method / resource Grain nitrogen concentration was useful for diagnosing maize nitrogen status and cover crop effects.
Method / resource Grain nitrogen nutrition index at maturity was especially useful for diagnosing maize nitrogen status and cover crop effects.
Recommendation The authors recommend accounting for cover crop management to adjust nitrogen rate and optimize maize productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flutriafol did not significantly affect yield.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: flutriafole0
Interactor: Septoria glycinesSeptoria glycinest0pathogene0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196

t0
“Septoria glycines on Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59

Title

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio

Christian D. Cruz; Dennis Mills; Pierce A. Paul; et al. Plant Disease 2010. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-7-0820

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Chlorothalonil treated and untreated plots differed in yield by 196 to 293 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Chlorothalonil applications produced significantly different brown spot levels.
Intervention effect Pyraclostrobin at R3 significantly reduced final brown spot.
Intervention effect Azoxystrobin at R3 significantly reduced final brown spot.
Intervention effect Yield increased significantly in only three of six location years under the fungicide treatments.
Intervention effect Flutriafol at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.
Intervention effect Tebuconazole at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.
Intervention effect Tebuconazole did not significantly affect yield.
Recommendation Further timing data are required for a long term management program.
Recommendation Brown spot resistance should be monitored during soybean cultivar development.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole did not significantly affect yield.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: tebuconazolee0
Interactor: Septoria glycinesSeptoria glycinest0pathogene0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196

t0
“Septoria glycines on Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59

Title

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio

Christian D. Cruz; Dennis Mills; Pierce A. Paul; et al. Plant Disease 2010. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-7-0820

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Chlorothalonil treated and untreated plots differed in yield by 196 to 293 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Chlorothalonil applications produced significantly different brown spot levels.
Intervention effect Pyraclostrobin at R3 significantly reduced final brown spot.
Intervention effect Azoxystrobin at R3 significantly reduced final brown spot.
Intervention effect Yield increased significantly in only three of six location years under the fungicide treatments.
Intervention effect Flutriafol at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.
Intervention effect Tebuconazole at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.
Intervention effect Flutriafol did not significantly affect yield.
Recommendation Further timing data are required for a long term management program.
Recommendation Brown spot resistance should be monitored during soybean cultivar development.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August sowing did not reduce soybean harvest index versus July sowing under irrigation.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: August sowinge0
Outcome: harvest indexe0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Comparator: July sowinge0
Setting: under irrigated conditionse0

Verbatim

e0
“The harvest index in the August sowing did not decrease compared to the July sowing under irrigated conditions.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–590

t0
“soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42

Title

Yield and dry matter production of soybean response to late planting in southwestern Japan

Yohei Kawasaki; Ryo Yamazaki; Satoshi Nakano; et al. Plant Production Science 2024. doi:10.1080/1343943x.2023.2299646

Other claims from this paper (6)

Association Yield decrease was associated with total aboveground dry matter rather than harvest index.
Association Lower total aboveground dry matter was associated with intercepted solar radiation rather than radiation use efficiency.
Method / resource A significant regression equation described relative soybean yield.
Association After mid-July, Sachiyutaka A1 seed yield declined 0.60% per day.
Association After mid-July, Akimaro seed yield declined 0.64% per day.
Recommendation The regression equation can indicate seed yield in fields where irrigation is possible.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

At the warmest Brazilian location, some models simulated no yield effect.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: no effecte0
Comparator: modelse0
Setting: Brazile0

Verbatim

e0
“In our warmest location in Brazil, the models simulated a yield reduction ranging from a 38% decrease under + 3 °C temperature rise to no effect on yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1262

t0
“soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–11

Title

Are soybean models ready for climate change food impact assessments?

Kritika Kothari; Rafael Battisti; Kenneth J. Boote; et al. European Journal of Agronomy 2022. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2022.126482

Other claims from this paper (10)

Method / resource Models varied considerably in simulated soybean yield responses to temperature and CO2.
Method / resource At the coolest Argentine location, models simulated a 24% yield reduction under 3 °C warming.
Method / resource At the coolest Argentine location, other models simulated yield increases up to 29%.
Method / resource At the warmest Brazilian location, simulated yield losses reached 38% under 3 °C warming.
Method / resource Raising CO2 from 360 to 540 ppm produced simulated yield increases of 6% to 31%.
Method / resource Calibration did not reduce variation across models.
Method / resource Calibration altered temperature yield responses in some models.
Method / resource Ensemble means reduced uncertainty in soybean yield simulations.
Method / resource Ensemble mean temperature and CO2 responses resembled literature results.
Recommendation Further model development using elevated CO2 and temperature experiments was recommended.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased phosphorus application had no effect on growth and yield of rice in alluvial paddy soil, which is high in available phosphorus.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: incrcased levels of phosphorus applicationse7
Outcome: growth and yield of rice plante7
Direction: no_changeinferrede7
Qualifier: high content of available phosphoruse7
Setting: alluvial paddy soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Rice Yield Decrease Resulting from Continual Direct Sowing Culture”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–91

e7
“The incrcased levels of phosphorus applications were not effective to the growth and yield of rice plant in this soil due to the high content of available phosphorus which was sufficient for the growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–2025

e0
“in alluvial paddy soil which was high in available phosphorus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2397–2458

Title

Studies on the Causes of Rice Yield Decrease Resulting from Continual Direct Sowing Culture : II. In relation to phosphorus nutrition

Yoshimasa UEMURA; AKIRA MIYASAKA Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1973. doi:10.1626/jcs.42.116

Other claims from this paper (9)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics