View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen content of the biomass did not show a clear decrease in elevated CO2.
Outcomenitrogen content e7 Directiondid not show a clear decrease e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Field-sown meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis , cv. Kalevi) stands were exposed to elevated temperatures (+3°C) and elevated CO2, (700 ppm) levels in two experiments conducted in 1992-1993 (experiment 1) and in 1994-1995 (experiment 2) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–232 e7 “The soluble carbohydrate content of above-ground biomass was 5-48% higher in elevated CO2 at most of the measuring times during the growing season, but the nitrogen content did not show a clear decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1256 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Elevated temperature (+3°C) increased total aboveground yield of field-sown meadow fescue by 38% on average relative to ambient temperature. Intervention effect At ambient temperatures, elevated CO2 increased tiller number by 63% in 1992. Intervention effect At ambient temperatures, elevated CO2 increased tiller number by 24% in 1993. Intervention effect At ambient temperatures, elevated CO2 increased tiller number by 90% in 1994. Intervention effect At ambient temperatures, elevated CO2 increased tiller number by 14% in 1995. Intervention effect At elevated temperatures, the elevated CO2 increase in tiller number was seen only in the first growing seasons after sowing. Intervention effect In experiment 1, total yield in a growing season was about 10% higher in elevated CO2. Intervention effect In experiment 2, at elevated temperatures, yield was more than 20% higher in elevated CO2. Intervention effect In experiment 2, at ambient temperatures, the rise in CO2 level had no effect on yield. Intervention effect In experiment 2, root biomass increased by more than 30% with the rise in CO2 level. Intervention effect In elevated CO2 at ambient temperatures, root biomass also increased in experiment I. Intervention effect At elevated temperatures, root biomass showed no consistent change in elevated CO2. Intervention effect Soluble carbohydrate content of above-ground biomass was 5-48% higher in elevated CO2 at most measuring times during the growing season. Intervention effect Elevated CO2 increased photosynthesis by 40-60%. Intervention effect Biomass showed a lack of a marked increase in elevated CO2, despite the 40-60% rise in photosynthesis. Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Amsoy 71 yield had no significant acidity effect in the other two years.
Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “but no significant effects for the other two. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–707 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–63 t1 “For Amsoy 71 there was a linear decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–605 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing cuts from five to three had little additional effect on dry-matter yield .
Taxonperennial ryegrass plus white clover t0 Treatmentthe decrease from five to three cuts e0 Outcomedry-matter yield e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Qualifierlittle additional effect e0 Verbatim
e0 “Decreasing the number of cuts from ten to five gave a marked increase in the dry-matter yield of mixed herbage and of clover at all nitrogen rates, but the decrease from five to three cuts had little additional effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–964 t0 “perennial ryegrass plus white clover swards ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–129 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Boron fertilization did not increase sunflower yield .
Treatmentboron fertilizing e0 Directiondid not provide an increase e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results obtained indicate that boron fertilizing did not provide an increase in yield , and in some cases led to its decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–598 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–67 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The number of branches did not decrease under water stress.
Outcomenumber of branches e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Verbatim
t0 “groundnut genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 e0 “in water stress conditions all yield parameters (pod number, pod weight, seed number, seed weight, harvest index and pod filling rate) and vegetative parameters (aerial biomass and height) with the exception of the number of branches decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–891 e1 “The other plants were well watered until harvest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–622 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliated plants showed no major decline in nonstructural carbohydrate reserves.
Outcomeconcentration of non-structural carbohydrate reserves e0 Directionwithout any major decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For defoliated plants, the decrease in the number of developing reproductive sinks appeared to be sufficient to maintain fruit weight and oil concentration at the control level, without any major decrease in the concentration of non-structural carbohydrate reserves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1569 t0 “oil palm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato yield was not lowered when planting tempo maintained plant number per hectare.
Verbatim
e0 “The potato yield was not lowered in the plots planted at the tempo that the plant number per ha did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2094 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting was associated with no reduction in corn grain yield .
Treatmentcrotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting e0 Outcomecorn grain yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “crotalaria was sown in the inter-row with a ridge planter at the time of maize planting and the system in which crotalaria was sown in the maize sowing furrow were feasible for straw production because they did not decrease corn grain yield and did not affect maize harvesting operations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1221 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Vetch termination date had no effect on maize yield .
Treatmentvetch termination date e0 Outcomeno effect of vetch termination date e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while there was no effect of vetch termination date ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1255 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
N fertilizer rate did not significantly affect soybean grain yield .
Directionno_change inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield was not significantly affected by N rate but did decrease with defoliation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–791 t0 “nodule activity of soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.