Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer row spacing did not increase Type I dry bean yield in Trial II because harvest index declined strongly.

Taxon: Dry Beanst0
Material: Type Ie0
Treatment: planting rows closer togethere0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: did not give increasede0
Qualifier: large decrease in harvest indexe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Type I did not give increased yields in response to planting rows closer together in Trial II because there was a large decrease in harvest index”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–401

t0
“Dry Beans”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52

Title

Simplified Growth Analysis of Non-climbing Dry Beans at Three Spacings in the Tropics

E. A. Kueneman; D.H. Wallace Experimental Agriculture 1979. doi:10.1017/s0014479700010346

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying against late blight did not significantly reduce late blight occurrence.

Taxon: BIOPOTATOESt0
Treatment: liquid spraye0
Interactor: Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome: occurrence of late blighte0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans) did not significantly decrease neither occurrence of late blight or the yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–528

t0
“BIOPOTATOES”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36

Title

ALTERNTIVE PROTECTION OF BIOPOTATOES IN ORGANIC FARMING

Jaroslav Tomášek; Petr Dvořák Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2010

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Botanical water extracts did not significantly reduce Colorado potato beetle adult attack versus control.
Observation Botanical extracts showed a trend of lower egg laying.
Observation Botanical extracts showed a trend of lower larval occurrence.
Intervention effect Spraying against late blight did not significantly decrease yield.
Observation Organic potato production represented 0,2 % of total Czech potato production.
Recommendation Authors propose water extracts for potato protection and yield and quality improvement.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum did not increase peanut pod calcium content.

Taxon: PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: Gypsum applicatione0
Outcome: pod calcium contente0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Gypsum application did not decrease pod rot, or increase yield or pod calcium content.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1135

t0
“Peanut Pod Rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26

Title

Etiology of Peanut Pod Rot in Nicaragua: I. The Effect of Pod Size, Calcium, Fungicide, and Nematicide

Joao Augusto; Timothy B. Brenneman; Alexander S. Csinos Plant Health Progress 2010. doi:10.1094/php-2010-0215-01-rs

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Pod rot did not differ between the two peanut cultivars.
Intervention effect Flutolanil did not decrease peanut pod rot.
Intervention effect Flutolanil increased peanut yield only when combined with aldicarb.
Intervention effect Gypsum did not decrease peanut pod rot.
Intervention effect Gypsum did not increase peanut yield.
Intervention effect Aldicarb had no effect on peanut pod rot.
Intervention effect Aldicarb significantly increased peanut yield by 22%.
Association Calcium deficiency did not increase peanut pod rot.
Association Lesion nematode damage did not increase peanut pod rot.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mandatory second fungicide application did not significantly decrease disease severity or AUDPC in southern areas.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Treatment: mandatory second fungicide application 14 days after the first applicatione3
Outcome: disease severity or AUDPCe3
Direction: did not significantly decreasee3
Comparator: treatments without the mandatory applicatione3
Setting: southern arease3

Verbatim

e0
“Management of Cercospora leaf spot, caused by Cercospora beticola, is necessary for the economic production of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–137

e3
“The mandatory second fungicide application 14 days after the first application for southern areas did not significantly decrease disease severity or AUDPC, or improve root yield or recoverable sucrose compared with treatments without the mandatory application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1284

Title

Improving the Cercospora Leaf Spot Management Model for Sugar Beet in Minnesota and North Dakota

J. Khan; L. E. del Río; R. Nelson; et al. Plant Disease 2007. doi:10.1094/pdis-91-9-1105

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The quinmerac plus metazachlor preparation did not decrease plant density or oil content of false flax seeds.

Taxon: false flaxCamelina sativae6
Treatment: quinmerac 83 g/l + metazachlor 333 g/le5
Outcome: plant density and oil content of false flax seedse6
Direction: does not decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5
“the preparation with a.i. quinmerac 83 g/l + metazachlor 333 g/l with the application rate of 2.0 or 2.5 l/ha should be applied to decrease the number of weeds in the sowings of winter false flax in the central zone of the Krasnodar region”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1375

e6
“This preparation, without having a toxic effect, increases the yield by 0.15-0.17 t/ha and does not decrease the plant density and oil content of false flax seeds”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1539

Title

The effect of herbicides on winter false flax (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz.)

Oksana Serdyuk; Victoria Trubina; Lyudmila Gorlova BIO Web of Conferences 2021. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20213202011

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease ear length, ear diameter or rows per ear of maize.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome: ear length, ear diameter, rows per eare0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Setting: Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103

e0
“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stubble burning did not reduce foot rot incidence or severity.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Stubble burninge0
Interactor: Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoidesOculimacula yallundaee0pathogen
Outcome: foot rot ( Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides ) incidence or severitye0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Stubble burning did not decrease foot rot ( Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides ) incidence or severity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1346

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39

Title

Stubble Burning Effects on Winter Wheat Yield and Nitrogen Utilization under Semiarid Conditions

P. E. Rasmussen; C. R. Rohde Agronomy Journal 1988. doi:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000060020x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Stubble burning did not affect grain yield or grain nitrogen uptake in six years.
Intervention effect Burning tended to increase straw yield with nitrogen fertilization.
Intervention effect Burning had no effect on straw nitrogen uptake.
Intervention effect Burning did not increase total nitrogen uptake.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilization increased yield and nitrogen uptake in all years.
Observation Mean grain yield was 3.1 Mg ha−1 at zero nitrogen.
Observation Mean grain yield was 4.7 Mg ha−1 at 45 kg nitrogen per hectare.
Observation Mean grain yield was 5.3 Mg ha−1 at 90 kg nitrogen per hectare.
Intervention effect Burning reduced downybrome density in one year.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant decrease in ripened-grain percentage was seen in the other four Ur1-carrying isogenic lines.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Material: other four Ur1-carrying isogenic linese1
Treatment: Ur1e1
Outcome: ripened-grain percentagee2
Direction: no significant decreasese1

Verbatim

t0
“in Rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–106

e1
“whereas no significant decreases were noticed in the other four Ur1-carrying isogenic lines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1783–1874

e2
“Ur1 decreased ripened-grain percentage by 17% in 30U, relative to 30+”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1781

Title

Yield-increasing Effect of a Major Gene, Ur1 (Undulate rachis -1) on Different Genetic Backgrounds in Rice

Masayuki Murai; Katsuya Nakamura; Mika Saito; et al. Breeding Science 2005. doi:10.1270/jsbbs.55.279

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Ur1 increased spikelet number per panicle by 29% in NU relative to N.
Intervention effect Ur1 increased spikelet number per panicle by 24% in NH relative to N.
Intervention effect Ur1 decreased panicle number per m2, ripened-grain percentage and 1000-grain weight by 4 to 8% and 4 to 6% in NU and NH.
Association Analysis of variance indicated that Ur1, genetic background and their interaction had significant effects on yield.
Observation The five Ur1-carrying isogenic lines had yields from 752 g/m2 (NU) to 542 g/m2 (30U).
Intervention effect Ur1 increased yield by 250 g/m2 (61%) to 75 g/m2 (16%) relative to N in field conditions.
Intervention effect Ur1 increased spikelet number per panicle by 62.1 to 39.2 (90% to 42%) relative to N in field conditions.
Intervention effect The spikelet-increasing effect of Ur1 was greater on a small-panicled genetic background than on a large-panicled genetic background.
Intervention effect Ur1 decreased ripened-grain percentage by 17% in 30U relative to 30+.
Association Ur1 increased culm length in 27U, 52U and 74U.
Association No increase in culm length was seen in NU and 30U with Ur1.
Observation Yield of NU, NH and N was in the order NU > NH > N, with no significant difference between NU and NH.
Recommendation NU could be a prospective material for developing high-yielding japonica varieties carrying Ur1, given lodging tolerance and yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter or leaf area index of maize.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome: chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Setting: Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103

e0
“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading did not reduce maximum spikelet number in Klein Toledo.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Klein Toledoe0
Treatment: Shadinge0
Outcome: maximum spikelet numbere0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Shading did not decrease maximum spikelet number in the tall standard cultivar Klein Toledo”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–660

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111

Title

Influence of shading during different periods upon ear development, grain yield and its components in two wheat cultivars

Daniel O. CALDIZ; Santiago J. SARANDÓN Agronomie 1988. doi:10.1051/agro:19880407

Other claims from this paper (5)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics