View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit did not decrease maximum quantum yield of PSII.
Outcomemaximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD did not decrease the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1081 t0 “Styrax camporum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Root hairs did not decrease barley yield under optimal conditions.
Organ / stageroot hairs e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the presence of root hairs did not decrease yield under optimal conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1594 e1 “Root hairs did not confer a notable advantage to barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1259 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing tillage did not decrease cane and sugar yield .
TreatmentReduction of tillage operation e0 Outcomecane and sugar yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Reduction of tillage operation did not decrease the cane and sugar yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1484 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–104 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Living mulch did not decrease apple yield compared with herbicide fallow.
Directiondid not decrease e1 Comparatorherbicide fallow e1 Verbatim
e0 “fruit of Malus domestica Borkh. cv. ‘Sampion’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–159 e1 “Compared to herbicide fallow, living mulch did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–372 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease dry matter or seed yield per plant.
Treatmentbasal 25% defoliation e0 OutcomeTDM and seed yield plant-1 e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed review summary no effect basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Increased IVDMD generally does not decrease forage yield .
Treatmentincreased IVDMD e6 Directionno_change inferred e6 Verbatim
e6 “Because increased IVDMD generally does not decrease forage yield per se ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1278 t0 “Breeding for Increased Forage Nutritional Value ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–79 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
I. tinctoria showed no significant relative yield decrease despite the highest shoot Pb concentration.
Outcomerelative yield decrease e0 Directionno significant e0 Verbatim
e0 “The highest shoot Pb concentration was in I. tinctoria having no significant relative yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1048 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The burndown treatment with glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl + diclosulam did not decrease soybean yield .
Treatmentglyphosate + halauxifen-methyl + diclosulam e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The burndown treatment to Conyza spp. with glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl + diclosulam did not decrease soybean yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1456 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Zinc sulphate and zinc oxide caused little or no decrease in tuber yield .
Treatmentzinc sulphate and zinc oxide e0 Directionlittle or no decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “zinc sulphate and zinc oxide caused little or no decrease in tuber yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1953 t0 “potato mop‐top virus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cutting did not significantly decrease stock plant yield .
Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Importantly, stock plants showed no significant decrease in plant yield after cutting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1144 t0 “white potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–79 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.