View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The treatments reportedly did not affect Thymol, although the abstract separately reports a decrease .
those treatments e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Trachyspermum ammi L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–157 e0 “Gamaterpinene and Thymol had not affected by those treatments but the Thymol was decrease d in the plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1848 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
MH75 caused no significant decrease in protein, GLI or GLU versus MH100.
protein content and the amount of GLI and GLU e0 did not cause a significant decrease e0 especially in the RT system e0 Verbatim
e0 “The application of the herbicide dose reduced by 25% (MH75) compared to the recommended dose (MH100), especially in the RT system, did not cause a significant decrease in protein content and the amount of GLI and GLU ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1407 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–152 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed set did not decline in fields with higher selfing rates.
did not decrease e0 fields with higher selfing rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “seed set did not decrease in fields with higher selfing rates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1119 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–52 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Early-season chemical control of the cotton aphid did not decrease square sheds.
Chemical control of the cotton aphid during early season e0 no_change inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Chemical control of the cotton aphid during early season does not affect the number of lateral bud, node, boll and summer boll produced per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–491 e1 “nor does it decrease square sheds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–526 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf N content at each sampling and its rate of decrease showed no significant correlation with the optimum fertilizer N rate.
content of N (%) in leaves at each sampling e2 optimum rate of fertilizer N e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “required for winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–76 e1 “the optimum rate of fertilizer N required for maximum grain yield was obtained ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–554 e2 “(i) content of N (%) in leaves at each sampling and its rate of decrease —no significant correlation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–747 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Variable row spacing did not decrease final soybean seed yield compared with constant rows.
variable row spacings e1 final seed yields e1 constant rows e1 Verbatim
e0 “Competition studies with soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 e1 “Compared to constant rows, the soybean cropping system using variable row spacings presents the choice of planting soybeans at close row spacings to provide early competition with weeds and the possibility of obtaining a forage crop after the first month of growth, without any decrease s on the final seed yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3515–3827 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect Full-season sicklepod competition made soybean plants less branched, with fewer leaves and thinner stems than the control. Intervention effect The presence of sicklepod did not affect soybean plant height. Intervention effect Under weed competition, soybean node number decreased in one of the two experiments. Intervention effect Under weed competition, number of pods, number of seeds and seed yield per plant were all similarly reduced. Intervention effect Under weed competition, seeds per pod decreased to a lesser extent than the other yield components. Intervention effect Increasing sicklepod infestation significantly diminished soybean seed yield per unit area. Intervention effect At 25,000 sicklepod plants/ha, soybean seed yield was reduced by 47% relative to the control. Intervention effect At 53,000 sicklepod plants/ha, soybean seed yield was reduced by 65% relative to the control. Intervention effect At 77,000 sicklepod plants/ha, soybean seed yield was reduced by 73% relative to the control. Intervention effect As soybean row distance decreased, branch number, leaf number and stem diameter decreased. Intervention effect As row width narrowed, soybean plant height increased. Intervention effect As row spacing was reduced, number of pods, number of seeds and seed yield per plant diminished. Association The maximum difference between row distances for these yield attributes was found in soybean under weed-free conditions. Intervention effect As row width decreased, soybean seed yield per unit area increased. Intervention effect Soybean in 90-cm rows yielded less than soybean in 60- and 30-60-cm rows in the variable pattern. Intervention effect Soil phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium contents were not affected by sicklepod levels or soybean populations. Intervention effect Neither sicklepod densities nor soybean row distances influenced seed germination and seedling vigor in the next soybean generation. Observation Sicklepod was a strong competitor with soybean at all density ranges investigated. Intervention effect Varying row spacing alone gives only limited success in managing sicklepod in soybean. Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Single seed weight did not change as lupin seed yield declined.
single seed weight e0 not to a change e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in lupin seed yield per plant was due to a decrease in pod number per plant, not to a change in the number of seeds per pod or single seed weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1757 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The other seven recombinant strains produced no significant biomass increase or decrease at Hancock.
seven other recombinant strains e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “no other significant increases or decrease s in alfalfa biomass were observed with the seven other recombinant strains at that site. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1786 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield of hybrids with strong tillering capacity showed no difference with decreasing planting density
hybrids with strong tillering capacity e6 decrease of planting densities e6 no yield difference e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “two hybrid rice combinations, Zhongyou 6 and Liangyou Peijiu as the materials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–193 e6 “With the decrease of planting densities, the yield of the hybrids with weak tillering capacity decrease d dramatically while no yield difference was found in the hybrids with strong tillering capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1167 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Simulated damage at one larva per two and a half feet did not significantly reduce seed cotton yield .
1 larva/2½ feet e0 yield of seed cotton e0 did not cause a significant decrease e0 undamaged check e0 Verbatim
e0 “Simulated larva damage at the level of 1 larva/5 feet and 1 larva/2½ feet did not cause a significant decrease in yield of seed cotton over the undamaged check. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–324 t0 “Heliothis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Trachyspermum ammit0
Triticum aestivum
Medicago sativa
Gossypium hirsutum
Aphis gossypii
Glycine max
Lupinus
Oryza sativa
Heliothis