View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation up to 33.3% at R3 caused no significant yield decline at any density.
defoliation of up to 33.3% at R3 e0 no significant decrease e0 regardless of the plant density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The soybean tolerate defoliation of up to 33.3% at R3 with no significant decrease in grain yield , regardless of the plant density. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1255 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil pH between 5.3 and 6.6 did not change total yield .
soil pH from 5.3 to 6.6 e0 did not increase or decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a range of soil pH from 5.3 to 6.6 did not increase or decrease leaf tipburn incidence, nutrient uptake or total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1168 t0 “cabbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
None of the insecticides decrease d soybean yield .
these insecticides e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “None these insecticides decrease soybean yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–888 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying PP333 at 250 mg per kilogram did not decrease grain number per ear or 1000 grain weight of wheat variety E352.
spraying with PP333 at the concentration of 250mg per kilogram e6 grain number per ear and 1000 grain weight e7 didn't decrease e7 field experiment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A field experiment was conducted to study the effects of plant growth regulators and density on plant height,lodging resistance and yield of wheat variety E352 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 e6 “when spraying with PP333 at the concentration of 250mg per kilogram,ear number per plot increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–688 e7 “but the grain number per ear and 1000 grain weight didn't decrease ,sequently the yield increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–785 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at the 75 % level did not reduce seed cotton yield or yield components over two years.
drip irrigation at 75 % treatment level e3 seed cotton yield and yield components e3 did not decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Effects of Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fibre Quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 e3 “Deficit irrigation of cotton with drip irrigation at 75 % treatment level (IR‐75) did not decrease seed cotton yield and yield components during 2 years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–758 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil available K content did not decrease significantly relative to the initial year of the experiment.
soil available K content e4 did not decrease significantly e7 initial year of the experiment e7 Verbatim
e1 “under the maize–wheat rotation system in the North China Plain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–373 e4 “However, the soil apparent K balance and soil available K content increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–859 e7 “but the latter did not decrease significantly compared with that in the initial year of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1031 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing fertilizer nitrogen did not decrease total nitrogen absorption in soils 2, 3 and 6.
reducing N input of chemical fertilizer e0 total N absorption e0 did not decrease e0 soils 2, 3, and 6 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing N input of chemical fertilizer did not decrease total N absorption or dry matter production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1138 e1 “in soils 2, 3, and 6 than those in the other soils ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1023 e2 “vegetable fields’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–694 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing fertilizer nitrogen did not decrease dry matter production in soils 2, 3 and 6.
reducing N input of chemical fertilizer e0 dry matter production e0 did not decrease e0 soils 2, 3, and 6 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing N input of chemical fertilizer did not decrease total N absorption or dry matter production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1138 e1 “in soils 2, 3, and 6 than those in the other soils ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1023 e2 “vegetable fields’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–694 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing mineral P fertilizer by 20% with maize straw incorporation did not decrease soil labile inorganic P concentration.
20% of mineral P fertilizer reduction and maize straw incorporation e1 soil labile inorganic P concentration e1 did not decrease e1 100% mineral P fertilizer was applied without straw addition e2 Verbatim
t0 “maize straw incorporation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–80 e1 “five years of continuous 20% of mineral P fertilizer reduction and maize straw incorporation significantly increased soil NaHCO3-Po and NaOH I-Pi concentrations, and did not decrease soil labile inorganic P concentration and grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–841 e2 “the treatment where 100% mineral P fertilizer was applied without straw addition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–934 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Calcium rates did not decrease potassium and magnesium uptake in castor bean.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there were no decrease s in K and Mg uptake due to Ca rates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1285 t0 “castor bean ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–77 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Glycine maxe0
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Triticum aestivum
Gossypium hirsutum
Zea mays
Ricinus communis