View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Increased yield from K fertilizer can either increase or decrease depending on K0 yield .
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “the average yield of maize with K0 treatment was 9000 kg ha -1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–677 e5 “Meanwhile, IY k can either increase or decrease depending on K0 yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1059 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield may decrease in the hottest Australian grape regions.
Verbatim
e0 “an increase in yield s may be expected in the coolest regions, while a decrease may be expected in the hottest regions. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1183 t0 “grape yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease from insect infestation was greater in Centennial than in the other genotype.
TreatmentInsect infestation e1 Outcomedecrease in Centennial yield e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Susceptibility of Selected Soybean Genotypes to Soybean Looper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–89 e1 “Insect infestation significantly reduced yield of both genotypes, but the decrease in Centennial yield was greater ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1397 e0 “Pseudoplusia includens ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–432 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Beyond about 943 mm, onion biomass yield is projected to decrease with additional water application.
Treatmentadditional water application e3 Verbatim
e0 “effect of different irrigation depths on onion (Allium cepa L.) yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–234 e3 “beyond that, the biomass yield will decrease with additional water application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1220 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T4 did not significantly decrease fresh yield of Chinese cabbage.
Directionwithout a significant decrease e4 Verbatim
e4 “However, it was clearly noted that T4 (MSFLI30) treatment could save water and nitrogen without a significant decrease in fresh yield of Chinese cabbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–959 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease percentages between crops varied among Louisiana sugarcane varieties.
Outcomeyield decrease percentages between crops e1 Verbatim
e0 “Sugarcane ( Saccharum sp. hyb.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 e1 “Louisiana commercial sugarcane varieties evaluated in this study varied in their yield decrease percentages between crops, but much of the pattern differences could be attributed to a few varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4699–4896 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging at the tillering stage caused the greatest yield penalty, a 10%–15% decrease .
Organ / stagetillering stage e1 Treatmentwaterlogging at the tillering stage e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “waterlogging in winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–71 e1 “the greatest yield penalties occurred by waterlogging at the tillering stage (10%–15% decrease ), followed by the jointing stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–292 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Upper-third defoliation caused the largest seed yield decrease relative to control.
Treatmentupper 1/3 defoliation e0 Directionhighest decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the highest decrease in the seed yield compared to the control were observed in the upper 1/3 defoliation levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1228 t0 “Safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotton seed yield did not decrease under PRI or CDI relative to FULL.
Treatmentdeficit treatments (PRI and CDI) e0 DirectionNo seed yield decrease e0 ComparatorFULL irrigation e0 Verbatim
e0 “No seed yield decrease was evident for cotton with the deficit treatments (PRI and CDI) compared with FULL irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–916 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Corn yield will likely decrease under future conditions of increased summer temperature and drought.
Qualifierunder future climate conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “Given the regional GCM prediction for increased summer temperatures and summer drought, both corn and soybean yield will likely decrease under future climate conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1329 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.