View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Limited irrigation II caused the smallest yield decrease compared with full irrigation.
Treatmentlimited irrigationⅡ e0 Directiondecrease degree e0 Comparatorfull irrigation treatment e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease degree of yield and grain per ear by treatment of limited irrigationⅡwere the smallest compared with the full irrigation treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–532 t0 “Upland Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Broadcast sowing up to 10 viable seeds m-2 did not decrease sorghum grain yield .
Treatmentbroadcast seedings e0 Outcomesorghum grain yield e0 Directiondo not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “up to 10 viable seeds m-2 using inter-row, and broadcast seedings do not decrease sorghum grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–994 t0 “Urochloa ruziziensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–58 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in maximum quantum yield indicates damage to the photosynthetic apparatus.
Outcomedamage to the photosynthetic apparatus e1 Qualifierdecrease in the maximum quantum yield e1 Verbatim
e0 “cotton plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–753 e1 “This decrease in the maximum quantum yield indicates damage to the photosynthetic apparatus of the plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1114 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation author interpretation review summary negative projected Claim · model-written summary
In future climates with warmer temperatures and elevated CO2, cotton yield will decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “Thus, it is concluded that in future climates, if increases in [CO2] are associated with higher temperatures, cotton yield and quality will decrease particularly in regions where present temperature are near to optimum. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–823 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
In the model, a seasonal temperature decrease of up to 3 oC enhanced wheat yield by 12-16 per cent.
Treatmentdecrease in seasonal temperature up to 3oC e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wheat yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 e0 “with decrease in seasonal temperature up to 3oC, the yield enhancement by 12-16 per cent was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–798 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in solar radiation after silking dropped maize grain yield and biomass.
Treatmenta decrease in solar radiation after silking e1 Outcomegrain yield and biomass e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Matching of maize growth with solar radiation is of great importance for achieving high yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–102 e1 “a decrease in solar radiation after silking caused a drop in maize grain yield and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–407 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Compaction from light axle loads can both increase and decrease crop yield , depending on soil texture and growing season precipitation.
Directionincrease and decrease e1 Qualifierdepending on soil texture and growing season precipitation e1 Verbatim
t1 “The Effect of Soil Compaction on Crop Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 e1 “This compaction can both increase and decrease crop yield depending on soil texture and growing season precipitation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–424 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading did not produce a detected significant decrease in Satsuma mandarin yield .
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in yield due to shading was not detected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–502 e1 “Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–437 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
A corn yield model suggests warmer climate would decrease eastern Kansas corn yield s by about 19%.
Treatmentwarmer climate e0 Verbatim
e0 “A corn yield model suggests that the warmer climate would decrease corn yield s in eastern Kansas by about 19% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–796 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Average yield loss is 769 +/- 319 kg ha(-1) for each unit decrease in leaf area index below the plateau.
Treatmentdecrease in leaf area index e3 Directiondecrease inferred e3 Value769 +/- 319 kg ha(-1) e3 Verbatim
e0 “full-season soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–131 e3 “Average yield loss was 769 +/- 319 kg ha(-1) for each unit decrease in leaf area index below the plateau ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1254 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.