View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A 20% decrease in irrigation rate had no significant effect on peach yield .
Treatment20% decrease in irrigation rate e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “to investigate the behavior of peach trees under sustained deficit irrigation (SDI) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–264 e1 “However, for the 20% decrease in irrigation rate, the effect on yield was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1184 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield did not decrease with the warming treatments in the analysis.
Treatmentincreasing warming treatments e4 Directiondid not decrease e4 Verbatim
e4 “Soy yield did not decrease with increasing warming treatments in this analysis, but experimental warming treatments did not exceed optimal soy growth temperature ranges ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1163 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading did not produce a detected significant decrease in Satsuma mandarin yield .
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in yield due to shading was not detected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–502 e1 “Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–437 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T4 did not significantly decrease fresh yield of Chinese cabbage.
Directionwithout a significant decrease e4 Verbatim
e4 “However, it was clearly noted that T4 (MSFLI30) treatment could save water and nitrogen without a significant decrease in fresh yield of Chinese cabbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–959 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cadmium application did not significantly decrease lettuce crop yield .
Treatment20 kg Cd ha(-1) application e0 Directiondid not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “20 kg Cd ha(-1) application did not result in a significant decrease in crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–511 e1 “lettuce plant and soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–270 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Aster Yellows did not significantly decrease root yield or phytochemical content in Echinacea .
InteractorAster Yellows e0 pathogen Outcomeroot yield phenolic or phytochemical content e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “While Aster Yellows were prevalent in Echinacea in Saskatchewan, this disease did not significantly decrease root yield phenolic or phytochemical content. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1393 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Light deficit during grain filling did not significantly decrease grain yield .
Organ / stagegrain filling stage e0 TreatmentLight water deficit e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Light water deficit during the grain filling stage did not significantly decrease grain yield and was significantly associated with improved grain quality and water conservation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1334 t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Retaining leaves 6–20 while removing others did not significantly decrease total plant dry matter yield .
Treatmentremoving all leaves except 6–20 e0 Outcometotal dry matter yield of the whole plant e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “removing all leaves except 6–20 did not decrease significantly total dry matter yield of the whole plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–573 e1 “Sugar‐beet plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–25 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Traffic on extremely compacted soil caused an additional yield decrease that was not significant in the first year.
Treatmentharvest traffic e0 Qualifierextremely compacted soil e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “When harvest traffic was applied to alfalfa grown in extremely compacted soil there was an additional decrease in yield . It was not statistically significant the 1st yr ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1458 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At Manhattan in 2007, yield did not decrease significantly until the final planting date.
Treatmentdelayed planting dates t1 Directiondid not decrease e0 Qualifierfinal planting date in 2007 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 e0 “yield at Manhattan, KS, did not decrease significantly until the final planting date in 2007 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1068 t1 “delayed planting dates and hybrids of varying maturity revealed that yield at Manhattan, KS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–998 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.