Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 20% decrease in irrigation rate had no significant effect on peach yield.

Treatment
20% decrease in irrigation ratee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6

“to investigate the behavior of peach trees under sustained deficit irrigation (SDI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–264
e1

“However, for the 20% decrease in irrigation rate, the effect on yield was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1184

Title

PHYSIOLOGICAL, VEGETATIVE, AND PRODUCTION RESPONSES OF PEACH TO SUSTAINED DEFICIT IRRIGATION

MERIAME LAITA; ZERHOUNE MESSAOUDI; RACHID BENKIRANE; et al. Journal of Global Agriculture and Ecology 2022. doi:10.56557/jogae/2022/v14i47818

Other claims from this paper (5)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield did not decrease with the warming treatments in the analysis.

Taxon
Soye4
Treatment
increasing warming treatmentse4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
did not decreasee4

Verbatim

e4

“Soy yield did not decrease with increasing warming treatments in this analysis, but experimental warming treatments did not exceed optimal soy growth temperature ranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1163

Title

Rising temperatures can negate CO2 fertilization effects on global staple crop yields: A meta-regression analysis

Chunwu Zhu; Julie Wolf; Jishuang Zhang; et al. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2023. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109737

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading did not produce a detected significant decrease in Satsuma mandarin yield.

Taxon
Satsuma mandarinCitrus unshiue1
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease in yield due to shading was not detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–502
e1

“Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–437

Title

Effect of Light Condition on Water and Carbon Balance in Satsuma Mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.) Fruit

Taku YANO; Makoto OHARA; Kimiaki MATSUBARA; et al. Environment Control in Biology 2013. doi:10.2525/ecb.51.49

Other claims from this paper (5)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T4 did not significantly decrease fresh yield of Chinese cabbage.

Treatment
T4 (MSFLI30)e4
Outcome
fresh yielde4
Direction
without a significant decreasee4

Verbatim

e4

“However, it was clearly noted that T4 (MSFLI30) treatment could save water and nitrogen without a significant decrease in fresh yield of Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–959

Title

Response of Fertigation Under Buried Straw Layer on Growth, Yield, and Water-fertilizer Productivity of Chinese Cabbage Under Greenhouse Conditions

Ghulam Rasool; Guo Xiangping; Wang Zhenchang; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2019. doi:10.1080/00103624.2019.1603306

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium application did not significantly decrease lettuce crop yield.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
20 kg Cd ha(-1) applicatione0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
did not result in a significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“20 kg Cd ha(-1) application did not result in a significant decrease in crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–511
e1

“lettuce plant and soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–270

Title

EFFECTS OF IRON APPLICATION AGAINST CADMIUM TOXICITY ON GROWTH AND ANTI-OXIDATIVE ENZYME ACTIVITY IN LETTUCE

Boysan Canal, Sibel; Bozkurt, Mehmet Ali Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Academic Data Management System 2017

Other claims from this paper (12)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aster Yellows did not significantly decrease root yield or phytochemical content in Echinacea.

Taxon
EchinaceaEchinaceae0
Interactor
Aster Yellowse0pathogen
Outcome
root yield phenolic or phytochemical contente0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0
Setting
Saskatchewane0

Verbatim

e0

“While Aster Yellows were prevalent in Echinacea in Saskatchewan, this disease did not significantly decrease root yield phenolic or phytochemical content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1393

Title

Effect of latitude on narrow-leaved purple coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia DC.) yield and phytochemical quality

Ian R. Willick; Branka Barl; Karen K. Tanino Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2019. doi:10.1139/cjps-2019-0030

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light deficit during grain filling did not significantly decrease grain yield.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Treatment
Light water deficite0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Light water deficit during the grain filling stage did not significantly decrease grain yield and was significantly associated with improved grain quality and water conservation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1334
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89

Title

Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Grain Yield and Quality Traits in Winter Wheat

Zhaojiang Meng; Aiwang Duan; Kithsiri Bandara Dassanayake; et al. Transactions of the ASABE 2016. doi:10.13031/trans.59.11400

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining leaves 6–20 while removing others did not significantly decrease total plant dry matter yield.

Treatment
removing all leaves except 6–20e0
Outcome
total dry matter yield of the whole plante0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“removing all leaves except 6–20 did not decrease significantly total dry matter yield of the whole plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–573
e1

“Sugar‐beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–25

Title

The effect of partial defoliation on yield of sugar beet

S. A. W. FRENCH; E. C. HUMPHRIES Annals of Applied Biology 1977. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1977.tb01876.x

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Traffic on extremely compacted soil caused an additional yield decrease that was not significant in the first year.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
harvest traffice0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
extremely compacted soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When harvest traffic was applied to alfalfa grown in extremely compacted soil there was an additional decrease in yield. It was not statistically significant the 1st yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1458

Title

Alfalfa Yield as Affected by Harvest Traffic and Soil Compaction in a Sandy Loam Soil

E. A. Rechel; B. D. Meek; W. R. DeTar; et al. jpa 1991. doi:10.2134/jpa1991.0241

Other claims from this paper (13)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Manhattan in 2007, yield did not decrease significantly until the final planting date.

Treatment
delayed planting datest1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0
Qualifier
final planting date in 2007e0
Setting
Manhattan, KSe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34
e0

“yield at Manhattan, KS, did not decrease significantly until the final planting date in 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1068
t1

“delayed planting dates and hybrids of varying maturity revealed that yield at Manhattan, KS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–998

Title

EFFECT OF DELAYED PLANTING ON CORN IN CENTRAL KANSAS

Aaron James Sindelar; Kraig L. Roozeboom K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) 2008

Other claims from this paper (4)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.