View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress caused a linear decrease in total plant biomass.
Outcometotal plant biomass e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 e0 “Salt stress induced a linear decrease in biological and paddy yield and total plant biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–688 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
On the poor site, whole tree harvesting is likely to cause only a 12% decrease in yield .
Treatmentwhole tree harvesting e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eucalyptus grandis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–60 e0 “On the poor site, there is likely to be only a 12% decrease due to whole tree harvesting, while harvesting stems only is unlikely to result in any decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2446–2610 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A combined analysis found that 20 to 30% terminal bud destruction was required to produce a significant decrease in total yield in cotton.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Larvae on Cotton Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 e4 “20 to 30% TBD was required to produce a significant decrease in total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–687 Other claims from this paper (5) Association hypothesis review summary negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Climate change is expected to decrease yield of major food crops.
Treatmentclimate change e0 Verbatim
e0 “Climate change has serious repercussions for national food security as farmers have limited knowledge and technologies for mitigating the adverse effects of climate change on crop productivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–491 e1 “This situation is expected to decrease yield of major food crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–557 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that characteristics increasing plant-weight variability will decrease harvest index and crop yield .
OutcomePHI, and crop yield e0 Qualifiervariability in PWT within a population e0 Verbatim
e0 “Agronomic or physiological characteristics that lead to variability in PWT within a population will decrease PHI, and crop yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1769 t0 “Four Grain Legumes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–97 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For cocoa non-adopters, a one-millimeter rainfall decrease reduced yield by 2.84 kg/ha.
Treatmentone-millimeter decrease in rainfall e0 Verbatim
e0 “A one-millimeter decrease in rainfall significantly reduces yield by 2.17 kg/ha for adopters and 2.84 kg/ha for non-adopters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1128 t0 “cocoa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Alvand and Shahriar had the largest yield decrease and smallest proline increase under severe stress.
Material‘Alvand’ and ‘Shahriar’ e0 Outcomemajor decrease in seed yield and the minimum increase in proline content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Under severe water stress conditions, the major decrease in seed yield and the minimum increase in proline content were documented in ‘Alvand’ and ‘Shahriar’. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1757 t0 “wheat varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The no-till yield decrease was more pronounced in GAL than SMA.
OutcomeYield differences e2 Directionmore pronounced decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with a more pronounced decrease in GAL than in SMA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–896 e1 “a clay-loam (GAL) and a sandy-clay-loam soil (SMA) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–622 e2 “Yield differences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–915 t0 “Durum Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Southern Finnish spring wheat faces a projected 30% probability of yield decrease owing to high temperature and drought.
Treatmenthigh temperature and drought e0 Settingsouthern Finland e0 Verbatim
e0 “in some areas of southern Finland, wheat production will face increasing risk of high temperature and drought, which can offset the benefits of climate change on wheat yield , resulting in an increase in yield variability and about 30% probability of yield decrease for spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1195 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Minsk oats had a climate-induced yield decrease of 48–72% of actual increase.
Treatmentclimate-induced e1 Verbatim
e0 “in early spring crops in Minsk region: spring wheat – 30–39 %, spring barley – 55–62, oats – 48–72 % of the actual increase. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–623 e1 “most of them were characterized by a climate-induced decrease in their yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–448 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.