View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For cocoa agroforestry adopters, a one-millimeter rainfall decrease reduced yield by 2.17 kg/ha.
Treatmentone-millimeter decrease in rainfall e0 Verbatim
e0 “A one-millimeter decrease in rainfall significantly reduces yield by 2.17 kg/ha for adopters and 2.84 kg/ha for non-adopters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1128 t0 “cocoa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha
Treatmentdecrease in tilling depth e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–976 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha, chickpea - by 0.53 t/ha, compared with the option of alternating plowing and loosening in crop rotation Intervention effect With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decreased: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha Intervention effect The lowest yield in the experiment was noted without basic tillage Observation The best results after plowing at 20-22 cm were due to the highest yield, as well as the highest mass of 1000 grains, the yield of fodder and grain units in this variant Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The infected Brusviana variety had a 58.5% yield decrease .
MaterialBrusviana variety e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “raspberry cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–44 e0 “from 58.5% (Brusviana variety) to 62.1% (Joan Jay variety) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–745 e1 “RBDV infection caused yield decrease by an average of 60.8% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–685 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant yield showed a general decrease with increased cadmium concentration, with variable response among accessions.
Treatmentincreased cadmium concentration e1 Directiongeneral decrease e1 Qualifiervariability in plant yield response to metal toxicity e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Effects of different cadmium levels on the growth and yield parameters of wild Vigna ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 e1 “There was variability in plant yield response to metal toxicity with a general decrease reported with increased cadmium concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1768 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Reduced water permeability combined with shorter roots enlarged the predicted lint yield decrease .
Treatmentdecreased root length was combined with reduced soil water permeability e0 Outcomedecrease in lint yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “This decrease in lint yield was much larger when decrease d root length was combined with reduced soil water permeability in remaining roots. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1072 t0 “Yield Decline in Cotton. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–49 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
If POD7 is increased by 1 mmol⋅O3 ⋅m−2, the simulated yield of winter wheat is projected to decrease by 6.5%.
TreatmentPOD7 is increased by 1 mmol⋅O3 ⋅m−2 e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e4 “If POD7 is increased by 1 mmol⋅O3 ⋅m−2, the yield of winter wheat will decrease by 6.5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1187 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect Under high sensitivity effect, the 150 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 72% in winter wheat. Intervention effect Under high sensitivity effect, the 100 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 36% in winter wheat. Intervention effect Under high sensitivity effect, the 50 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 6% in winter wheat. Intervention effect Under low sensitivity effect, the 150 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 13% in winter wheat. Intervention effect Under low sensitivity effect, the 100 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 6% in winter wheat. Intervention effect Under low sensitivity effect, the 50 nL⋅L−1 O3 treatment gave a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 1% in winter wheat. Observation The control group (CK, ambient air) had a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 10% in winter wheat under high sensitivity effect. Observation The control group (CK, ambient air) had a simulated photosynthetic loss rate of 2% in winter wheat under low sensitivity effect. Association Cumulative stomatal O3 absorption flux (PODY) of winter wheat, with threshold Y of 7 nmol⋅ (m2⋅s)−1, had the highest correlation with relative yields. Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
CMS cytoplasm influenced an insignificant decrease in average yield in 7 of the 10 hybrids tested.
Qualifier7 of the 10 hybrids tested e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cytoplasmic male sterility is important for seed production of maize hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–201 e2 “In 7 of the 10 hybrids tested, CMS cytoplasm influenced the insignificant decrease in average yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–943 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Residual rice yield declined during 2016-2018, consistent with a soil moisture decrease .
Outcomeresidual rice yield e0 Qualifierdecrease in soil moisture e0 Setting2016-2018 period e0 Verbatim
e0 “During the 2016-2018 period, there existed a reduction in the residual rice yield that was consistent with a decrease in soil moisture during the same time period. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1599 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Edirne had a 14% yield decrease with artificial infection.
Treatmentartificially i nfected treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the artificially i nfected treatment cv. Halilbey, Edirne, Gala and Tu nca exhibited 29.6%, 14%, 13.5% and 5.1% yield decrease , respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1085 t0 “rice cultivars resulting from rice white tip nematode Aphelenchoides besseyi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–104 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower well-water temperature was asserted to directly influence the pepper yield decrease .
QualifierTemperature of well water was lower than the allowed minimum e3 Verbatim
e0 “yield of pepper hybrids Cecil F1 and Bianca F1 in the early glasshouse production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–191 e3 “Temperature of well water was lower than the allowed minimum and therefore had direct influence on the yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–785 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Well-water irrigation decreased pepper crop yield relative to lagoon water. Intervention effect Irrigation water efficiency differed between the two water sources (P<0,05). Association Average fruit weight differed significantly between the two pepper hybrids (P<0,05). Association The two pepper hybrids reacted differently to lagoon and well water (significant interaction). Association Factor year did not significantly affect pepper crop yield in the controlled glasshouse. Intervention effect Well water had higher values than lagoon water for EC, sodium, potassium, calcium, chlorine, magnesium, bicarbonate, sulphate, iron and boron. Observation Well-water irrigation caused accumulation of slime and blocking of sprinklers. Observation Well-water irrigation disturbed soil structure and caused fruit deformation. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.