View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield decrease depended on weather, weed infestation and stem base rot.
Outcomewinter wheat yield e0 Qualifierweed infestation e0 Settingweather conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in winter wheat yield depended on weather conditions, weed infestation and the occurrence of stem base rot (Fusarium spp.). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–799 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Subsoiling before cotton did not decrease corn yield the following year.
Treatmentin-row subsoiling conducted prior to the cotton crop e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in-row subsoiling conducted prior to the cotton crop provided maximum cotton yield s with no decrease in corn yield the following year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1585 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The three perennial crops did not show a corresponding yield decrease with declining precipitation.
Directionno corresponding decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield s of maize, cotton and soybean decrease d sharply with decreasing precipitation, but there was no corresponding decrease in yield of the three perennial biomass crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1360 t0 “mimosa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield tended to decrease where lodging was absent and ethephon reduced kernel number or mass.
Qualifierlodging was not a factor e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield tended to decrease in cases where lodging was not a factor and ethephon reduced kernels per spike and/or kernel mass. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1819 t0 “Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Estimated yield decrease from pest defoliation was less than 1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The overall decrease in yield is estimated to be less than 1% by defoliation due to this pest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–652 e2 “Acherontia lachesis (F.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–64 t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–93 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Yangambi km5 showed no yield decrease with nematodes at either harvest.
Treatmentpresence of nematodes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Yangambi km5 showed no decrease in LAI and yield in the presence of nematodes at both harvests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1472 e1 “a banana (Musa spp.) field trial ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–143 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
White-sugar yield did not decrease under sodium application.
Outcomewhite‐sugar yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “ultimately there was no decrease in white‐sugar yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1293 t0 “sodium in sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 e1 “growth and quality of sugar beet were not affected by Na application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1234 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing density from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield .
Treatmentsix plants per meter e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The reduction from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1293 t0 “common bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.
Qualifierfor every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) e0 Verbatim
e0 “declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723 e1 “yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at Kanafar correlated with higher growing-season temperature (by 0.6 degrees C).
TaxonCabernet Sauvignon t0 Treatmenthigher temperature during the growing season e1 Outcomedecrease in yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “Cabernet Sauvignon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–29 e1 “the decrease in yield at Kanafar correlated with higher temperature during the growing season (by 0.6 °C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1355 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.