View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Industrial tomato yield did not decrease at salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1).
industrial tomatoes e0 salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1) e0 without any decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “industrial tomatoes could be grown in salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1) without any decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1022 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The rate of simulated Sarjoo-52 yield decrease was faster under delayed July 25th transplanting.
delayed transplanting of July 25th e0 Verbatim
e0 “The Rate of decrease of simulated yield of rice Sarjoo-52 variety under 2020 to 2080 was faster under delayed transplanting of July 25th ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1512 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield enhancement coincided with a relative decrease in oat grain protein content of 11.3 to 12.4%.
Yield enhancement e0 protein content of oat grains e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield enhancement was accompanied by a relative decrease of protein content of oat grains ranging from 11.3 to 12.4 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–955 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Jointing booting water control tended to slightly decrease yield .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “yield had a slightly decreasing tendency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–666 t0 “Rice Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod number per plant was reduced with water deficit and mainly accounted for the yield decrease .
pod number per plant e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease was mainly due to reduced pod number per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–818 t0 “pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–15 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted, with a large yield decrease .
N and P were applied together without K e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Valencia orange trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 e1 “When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted with large yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–798 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Applied individually, N fertilizer gave a response of 6 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, P fertilizer gave a response of 5 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, K fertilizer gave a response of 23 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect The total response to N, P and K applied simultaneously was 40 per cent, compared with 37 per cent predicted by sequential additivity and 34 per cent by simple addition. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to N was 8 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to P was 7 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to K was 26 in Valencia orange. Observation The interactions of K with P and of K with N were also sequentially additive. Intervention effect Adding K to the N plus P treatment resulted in a 69 per cent yield increase. Observation Potassium was a limiting factor only for N and P together, not for N or P individually. Recommendation The authors suggest an alternative procedure to DRIS analysis. Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in yield under W2 tended to become larger as truss position increased in 2018–2019.
truss position e4 Verbatim
t0 “Regulation of tomato yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 e4 “the decrease tended to become larger as truss position increased in 2018–2019 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1175 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting a portfolio of soybean varieties can decrease soybean yield variability in Arkansas.
planting a portfolio of soybean varieties e1 yield variability e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The results showed that there are significant advantages in planting a portfolio of soybean varieties that can enhance profits and decrease yield variability for soybean producers in Arkansas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–843 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Use of a herbicide allowed a lower seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield .
Use of a herbicide e3 sericea stand or forage yield e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “Use of a herbicide permitted a reduction in seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–414 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was more significant when weed was in rows of maize, in both seasons.
weed in rows of maize e3 in both seasons e3 Verbatim
e3 “Yield was significantly affected by the weed position in both seasons and the decrease was more significant in variants with weed in rows of maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–977 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativa
Avena sativa
Lathyrus oleraceus
Citrus sinensis
Solanum lycopersicum
Glycine max
Lespedeza cuneata
Zea mays