View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
MeJa did not restore total phenolics after their decrease under salinity.
Total phenolic compounds e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Total phenolic compounds were not recovered by MeJa after their decrease by salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1366 t0 “Sea Fennel ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–116 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed sowing and density up to 10.5×104 plants/hm2 did not significantly decrease seed cotton and lint cotton yield .
delaying sowing date and increasing density to 10.5×104 plants/hm2 e0 yield of seed cotton and lint cotton e0 no significantly decreased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The yield of seed cotton and lint cotton had no significantly decrease d by delaying sowing date and increasing density to 10.5×104 plants/hm2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–789 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The flower reduction was not associated with lower yield .
not associated with a decrease e1 Verbatim
e0 “plants of Upland cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–165 e1 “this was not associated with a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–489 e2 “small reduction in flower production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–435 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvest-pruning did not significantly decrease dried fruit yield of Sultana vines after seven and five seasons.
harvest-pruning e0 yields of dried fruit e1 After seven and five seasons e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The effect of harvest-pruning of the grapevine cv. Sultana ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–58 e1 “After seven and five seasons respectively, yield s of dried fruit had not decrease d significantly on harvest-pruned vines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–313 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sesame yield did not decrease with rate at the south-central Texas site.
south-central Texas location e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sesame yield s decrease d as the diuron rate increased at the High Plains location but not the south-central Texas location while application timing had no effect at either location. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1846 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Removing the clonal tillers at 20 or 40 days after transplanting did not significantly decrease grain yield compared with the undisturbed crop.
clonal tillers were removed at 20 or 40 days after transplanting e2 did not decrease e2 undisturbed crop e2 Verbatim
e1 “In rainfed lowland rice areas of intermediate deepwater (15–50 cm), transplanting in greater depths of water (50–60 cm) with clonal tillers (double transplanting) from 20 or 40- to 50-day-old-transplanted crops of similar environment increased grain yield significantly compared with seedlings of the same age (60 or 80- to 90-day-old) from a nursery ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–358 e2 “The grain yield did not decrease significantly when the clonal tillers were removed at 20 or 40 days after transplanting compared with that of the undisturbed crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–523 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly lower dry matter.
basal 25% defoliation e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not decrease TDM, seed weight/plant and seed yield /ha significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–867 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–103 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Most S. pimpinellifolium accessions showed a similar percent decrease in mean under salt stress compared with cultivated checks.
S. pimpinellifolium accessionse1 percent decrease in mean e1 cultivated checks e1 Verbatim
e1 “most traits of S. pimpinellifolium accessions showed a similar percent decrease in mean under salt stress compared with the cultivated checks ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–695 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped maize showed no lodging or decrease in height or first ear height.
lodging, reduction in height, nor decrease in the first ear height e0 Verbatim
e0 “Intercropped maize did not have lodging, reduction in height, nor decrease in the first ear height in relation to the intercropped plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–903 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Narrow rows did not decrease giant foxtail seed production.
giant foxtail e0 weed giant foxtail, common ragweed, and ivyleaf morningglory seed production e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Narrow rows did not decrease giant foxtail, common ragweed, and ivyleaf morningglory seed production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1783 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Crithmum maritimumt0
Gossypium hirsutum
Vitis
Sesamum indicum
Oryza sativa
Glycine max
Solanum pimpinellifolium
Zea mays