View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Each additional degree of future summer warming could decrease soybean yield by 16%.
future warming during summer months e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “of future warming during summer months, corn and soybean yield s could potentially decrease by 13 % and 16%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–907 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping limited the weed-related maize yield decrease to 16%.
intercropping with cowpea e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “intercropping with cowpea reduced this to only a 16% decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1031 t0 “maize ( Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–91 Other claims from this paper (9) Association author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield is projected to decrease under future climate conditions because of lower grain weight and ripened grain ratio.
future climate conditions e7 grain weight decreased by shorter grain filling period e7 Verbatim
t0 “Yield and Yield Components of Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 e7 “grain yield would decrease under future climate conditions due to grain weight decrease d by shorter grain filling period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3083–3203 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The capacity of Myc to increase yield was not enough to compensate for the yield decrease caused by reduced fertilization.
reduced fertilization e7 Verbatim
e7 “In this experiment, the Myc’s capacity to increase yield was not enough to compensate for the yield decrease caused by reduced fertilization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1591 e5 “very few data on wether mycorrhizal inoculants affect soil biological activity and cereal growth in temperate climates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–460 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield decrease by 29%.
applying mycorrhizal fungi e0 mycorrhizal fungi e0 symbiont grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that seed yield reduced the by 42% under weedy conditions and applying mycorrhizal fungi compensated the grain yield decrease by 29%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–825 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 Other claims from this paper (12) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The combination of fulvic acid and Bacillus subtilis caused an antagonistic decrease in grain yield .
grain yield decrease e4 An antagonism effect of the combination of FA and BS e4 Verbatim
e0 “during the maize cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–345 e4 “An antagonism effect of the combination of FA and BS induced a grain yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–785 Other claims from this paper (5) Association author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Too high a density and more N fertilizer could decrease yield .
Too bigger density and more N fertilizer rate e1 Verbatim
t0 “Summer Maize Zhuyu 309 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–126 e1 “Too bigger density and more N fertilizer rate could decrease the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1472 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Selecting for pods per area was expected to decrease yield , seeds per pod, and seed weight.
yield, seeds/pod and seed weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “Direct selection for pods/m 2 would decrease yield , seeds/pod and seed weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1584 t0 “Phaseolus vulgaris L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–79 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% under scenario A1.
scenarios A1 and B1, respectively e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield is projected to decrease by 85.73% under scenario B1.
scenarios A1 and B1, respectively e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Glycine maxe0
Zea mays
Vigna unguiculata
Oryza sativa
Helianthus annuus
Phaseolus vulgaris_from_India.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Mangifera indica