View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The grain mass decrease with stand density increase was not recorded at the second and third sowing terms.
Treatmentsecond and third sowing terms e1 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e1 “This tendency was not recorded at the second and third sowing terms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3209–3276 t0 “grain sorghum yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–58 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage did not decrease YSNE compared with conventional tillage
TreatmentNo-tillage management e1 Directiondid not decrease e1 Verbatim
e1 “No-tillage management did not decrease YSNE value compared to CT operation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1877–1951 e2 “Maize ( Zea mays ) was cultivated from 6th July to 4th October, 2018 (year 1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–697 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Above-ground biomass did not decrease despite shorter plants in cultivars developed after the 1990s.
Materialcultivars developed after the 1990s e0 OutcomeAbove-ground biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “Above-ground biomass of the cultivars developed after the 1990s dose not decrease with shortening plant height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–906 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–106 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DT6 biomass did not decrease significantly versus DT2.
Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in biomass and cotton yield was observed compared to the DT2 sample. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1302 e1 “The DT6 plants (60% Urea + DCD + NBPT + cotton straw) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1164 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
CO2 application did not decrease the T. cinnabarinus population in strawberry tunnels.
TreatmentCO2 application e0 OutcomeT. cinnabarinus populatione0 Directionnot to cause any effect likely to decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 e0 “CO2 application were found not to cause any effect likely to decrease T. cinnabarinus population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–439 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Late-season N did not significantly change grain yield .
TreatmentLate‐season N treatments e1 Directiondid not significantly increase or decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “did not significantly increase or decrease grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–882 e1 “Late‐season N treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–789 e2 “hard red winter (HRW) wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–138 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Economic coefficient showed a non-significant decrease , except under soil Cu levels above 800 mg/kg.
Treatmentsoil Cu levels e2 Outcomeeconomic coefficient e2 Qualifierexcept under soil Cu levels above 800 mg/kg e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “economic coefficient showed non-significant decrease except under soil Cu levels above 800 mg/kg ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1451 t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Flutriafol at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.
Outcomelevels of brown spot e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196 t0 “Septoria glycines on Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Tebuconazole at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.
Outcomelevels of brown spot e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196 t0 “Septoria glycines on Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The developed implements did not decrease the soil pulverization rate.
Treatmentdeveloped implements e2 Outcomesoil pulverization rate e2 Directionno_change inferred e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “The developed implements did not require a large amount of power and did not lead to a decrease in the soil pulverization rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1012 e7 “cabbage yield increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1203 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.