View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Heading rate of Huang Huazhan showed no change across leaf development stages.
direct seeding rice e1 leaf development stage e5 no_change inferred e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “To determine the optimal drying period for direct seeding rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–71 e5 “Shuyou 217 exhibited a decrease in heading rate with increasing leaf development stage, whereas Huang Huazhan showed no significant difference ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1001 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
ASD decrease d nematode populations by 15 to 56%, a difference that was not significant.
Horticultural Crops t0 nematode suppression e4 decrease inferred e4 unamended controls e1 Verbatim
t0 “Horticultural Crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 e1 “compared with unamended controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–727 e4 “The ASD effect ranged from 15 to 56% for nematode suppression and 32 to 81% for weed suppression, but these differences were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1465 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
ASD decrease d weed abundance by 32 to 81%, a difference that was not significant.
Horticultural Crops t0 weed suppression e4 decrease inferred e4 unamended controls e1 Verbatim
t0 “Horticultural Crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 e1 “compared with unamended controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–727 e4 “The ASD effect ranged from 15 to 56% for nematode suppression and 32 to 81% for weed suppression, but these differences were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1465 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
CTS, NTS, and NT e0 ECe, pH, and stoichiometric properties e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “CTS, NTS, and NT had non-significant effects on ECe, pH, and stoichiometric properties (C:N ratio, C:P ratio, and N:P ratio) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2089 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 e1 “conventional tillage (CT) control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–757 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.
low fertilization e0 fiber strength and fiber line density e0 no significant reduction e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield , fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870 t0 “kenaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield per plant showed a non-significant negative correlation with number of leaf rolling and days to 50% heading in wheat.
F1 and F2 Generations t0 grain yield per plant e0 decrease inferred e0 non-significant and negative correlation with number of leaf rolling and days to 50% heading e0 Verbatim
t0 “Analysis of Correlation and Path Coefficient in F1 and F2 Generations of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Normal and Heat Stress Condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 e0 “A study on Twenty-three characters revealed that there was a highly significant and positive association of grain yield per plant exhibited highly significant and positive correlation with biological yield per plant and productive tillers per plant, Also, the grain yield per plant exhibited non-significant and negative correlation with number of leaf rolling and days to 50% heading. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–1030 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma harzianum and nano silica treatments did not significantly change infection rate or number of leaves.
T. harzianum and nano silicae3 infection rate and number of leaves e3 no_change inferred e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Twisted disease is one of the important diseases that can decrease shallot yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 e3 “Treatments of T. harzianum and nano silica did not significantly affect the infection rate and number of leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1299 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Trichoderma harzianum at 20 g per plant gave the lowest twisted-disease intensity, 2.74%, at 20 days after planting.Intervention effect Nano silica at 3000 ppm gave the lowest twisted-disease intensity, 2.48%, at 20 days after planting. Intervention effect Trichoderma harzianum at 20 g per plant gave the lowest twisted-disease intensity, 11.81%, at 40 days after planting.Intervention effect Nano silica at 3000 ppm gave the lowest twisted-disease intensity, 10.81%, at 40 days after planting. Intervention effect The combination of Trichoderma harzianum at 20 g per plant and nano silica at 3000 ppm gave the highest tuber diameter, 2.370 cm. Intervention effect The same combination gave the highest number of tubers, 6. Intervention effect The same combination gave the highest tuber fresh weight, 36.2 g. Intervention effect The same combination gave the highest tuber dry weight, 28.7 g. Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.
All NK fertilizer as base fertilization e0 did not reduce significantly e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield , fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870 t0 “kenaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Early sowing decrease d grain nitrogen concentration 2%, nonsignificantly.
grain N concentration e0 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “grain N concentration (+4%, −2% n.s.). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–889 t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–124 e1 “Compared to the control treatment, across cultivars, the treatment without fungicide mostly exerted stronger and inverse effects than early sowing, on grain yield (GY, −12% without fungicide, +8% n.s. for early sowing) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–798 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Without fungicide, grain yield was 12% lower than control. Intervention effect Early sowing increased grain yield 8%, nonsignificantly. Intervention effect Without fungicide, grain nitrogen uptake fell 9%, nonsignificantly. Intervention effect Early sowing increased grain nitrogen uptake 5%, nonsignificantly. Intervention effect Without fungicide, grain nitrogen concentration increased 4%. Observation Without fungicide, total dry matter was similar to control. Intervention effect Without fungicide, harvest index, kernel weight, NUE and N utilization efficiency were lower. Association Lower grain N uptake coincided with similar vegetative N uptake. Association Lower grain N uptake coincided with lower N translocation efficiency and N harvest index. Intervention effect Early sowing tended to increase total dry matter at anthesis and maturity and post-anthesis assimilation. Observation With early sowing, harvest index was similar. Intervention effect Early sowing increased grains per spike and total N use efficiency. Observation Total N uptake increased after winter but was similar at anthesis. Intervention effect Relative N responses in many traits were lower without fungicide. Observation Few fungicide interactions were significant. Observation Sowing date did not interact with N fertilization for N and dry matter traits. Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Without fungicide, grain nitrogen uptake fell 9%, nonsignificantly.
without fungicide e1 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “grain Nup (GNup, −9% n.s., +5% n.s.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–836 t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–124 e1 “Compared to the control treatment, across cultivars, the treatment without fungicide mostly exerted stronger and inverse effects than early sowing, on grain yield (GY, −12% without fungicide, +8% n.s. for early sowing) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–798 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Without fungicide, grain yield was 12% lower than control. Intervention effect Early sowing increased grain yield 8%, nonsignificantly. Intervention effect Early sowing increased grain nitrogen uptake 5%, nonsignificantly. Intervention effect Without fungicide, grain nitrogen concentration increased 4%. Intervention effect Early sowing decreased grain nitrogen concentration 2%, nonsignificantly. Observation Without fungicide, total dry matter was similar to control. Intervention effect Without fungicide, harvest index, kernel weight, NUE and N utilization efficiency were lower. Association Lower grain N uptake coincided with similar vegetative N uptake. Association Lower grain N uptake coincided with lower N translocation efficiency and N harvest index. Intervention effect Early sowing tended to increase total dry matter at anthesis and maturity and post-anthesis assimilation. Observation With early sowing, harvest index was similar. Intervention effect Early sowing increased grains per spike and total N use efficiency. Observation Total N uptake increased after winter but was similar at anthesis. Intervention effect Relative N responses in many traits were lower without fungicide. Observation Few fungicide interactions were significant. Observation Sowing date did not interact with N fertilization for N and dry matter traits. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Hibiscus cannabinus
Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Trichoderma harzianum