View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One to three large alfalfa weevil larvae often caused a significant decrease in alfalfa yield .
Qualifierone to three large larvae e2 Verbatim
e0 “Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 e1 “The alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica (Gylenhall) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–184 e2 “one to three large larvae often cause a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–822 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
A 50% reduction of plant-available N would decrease crop yield by 17%.
Treatmentreduction of plant-available N by 50% e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “a reduction of plant-available N by 50% would lead to a decrease in crop yield by 17% and a concomitant increase in N response efficiency by 67% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1267 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in spikelet number is one of the main reasons for the yield reduction under water deficit.
Qualifierdecrease of spikelets numbers e3 Verbatim
e0 “During panicle development stage of hybrid rice varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 e3 “The decrease of spikelets numbers is one of the main reasons leading to yield reduction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–690 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Severe drought caused a greater grain yield decrease in Yangmai-16.
Treatmentsevere drought stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under severe drought stress, Yangmai-16 displayed relatively less adaptability to drought, with a slower recovery after re-watering and a greater decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1326 t0 “wheat (Triticum aestivum ) cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–106 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Increasing harvested area by 10 hectares was forecast to decrease yield by 0.01 tons per hectare.
Treatmentincreasing area harvested by 10 hectares e0 Value0.01 tons per hectare e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “increasing area harvested by 10 hectares that would decrease the yield by 0.01 tons per hectare ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1207 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low resistance to fungal leaf pathogens was identified as the main cause of yield decrease across cultivars.
Interactorfungal pathogens e0 pathogen Qualifierlow level of resistance e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield decrease for all cultivars was mainly affected by low level of resistance on fungal pathogens responsible for leaf diseases. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–905 t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Quantum yield varied significantly with oxygen partial pressure, with the greatest decrease at 2 kPa oxygen.
Treatment2 kPa of oxygen e0 Comparatoroxygen partial pressures e0 Verbatim
e0 “The quantum yield data showed significant variation among the oxygen partial pressures with the most significant decrease at 2 kPa of oxygen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–999 t0 “radish ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield decrease s by more than 40 % when protective measures decrease by 30 %.
Treatmentdecrease of 30 % in the volume of protective measures e0 Outcomeyield of grain crops e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of grain crops decrease s by more than 40 % with a decrease of 30 % in the volume of protective measures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1039 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Organophosphate treatments could decrease yield through toxicity when nematode populations were low.
Treatmentorganophosphate e1 Qualifierthe toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “or in a yield decrease , because the toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–963 e1 “with organophosphate and carbamate nematicides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–752 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Later nitrogen fertilization reduced its production benefit and tended to decrease dry yield .
Treatmentnitrogen fertilizer e0 Outcomedry pasturage yield e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With fertilization time delay gradually,the role of nitrogen fertilizer on the increase production decrease d uccording to the experiment data and there was decrease tend in the dry pasturage yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–722 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.