Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A 40% grain yield decrease had a 10.5% occurrence probability.

Taxon: MAIZEZea mayst0
Outcome: probability of occurrencee0
Value: 10.5%e0
Qualifier: 40% of grain yield decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The levels of 40% of grain yield decrease present 10.5% of probability of occurrence.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1201

t0
“WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78

Title

WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST

CLÍSTENES ANTÔNIO GUADAGNIN; EDGAR RICARDO SCHOFFEL; HELVIO DEBLI CASALINHO; et al. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo 2017. doi:10.18512/1980-6477/rbms.v16n1p61-71

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Observation The largest maize yield decrease occurred with early August sowing.
Observation The smallest maize yield decrease occurred with late January to February sowings.
Observation Yield decrease varied by up to 3.9% among maturation cycles.
Method / resource Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease.
Method / resource Isareg overestimated yield decrease when relative evapotranspiration exceeded 0.8.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high populations, the decrease in barley grain yield was accompanied by a comparable decrease in grains per unit area.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment: high populationse1
Outcome: number of grains per unit areae1
Direction: decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46

e1
“a decrease in grain yield at high populations was associated with a comparable decrease in the number of grains per unit area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1397

Title

Plant population and shading studies in barley

R. W. Willey; R. Holliday The Journal of Agricultural Science 1971. doi:10.1017/s0021859600064510

Other claims from this paper (9)

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in redistributed seed N correlated strongly with increased yield.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: this decreasee0
Outcome: increased yielde0
Direction: increasede0

Verbatim

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–117

e0
“this decrease strongly correlated with increased yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1218

Title

Elevated CO2 Increases Nitrogen Fixation at the Reproductive Phase Contributing to Various Yield Responses of Soybean Cultivars

Yansheng Li; Zhenhua Yu; Xiaobing Liu; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2017. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01546

Other claims from this paper (7)

Association Yield response to elevated CO2 correlated strongly with increased symbiotically fixed N between R5 and R8.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 caused small increases in fertilizer-derived N uptake from R5 to R8.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 caused small increases in soil-derived N uptake from R5 to R8.
Association Increases in fertilizer-derived and soil-derived N uptake did not correlate with enhanced yield.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 reduced the proportion of seed N redistributed from shoots to seeds.
Association Total N uptake was associated with increased fixed N per nodule under elevated CO2.
Association Total N uptake was not associated with changes in nodule biomass, density or root length.

Observationauthor interpretationreview summarymeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diseases may decrease marketable root yield.

Taxon: table beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Outcome: yield of marketable rootse0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“decrease the yield of marketable roots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–313

t0
“table beet”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 107–117

Title

Challenges and Prospects for Building Resilient Disease Management Strategies and Tactics for the New York Table Beet Industry

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Julie R. Kikkert; Linda E. Hanson; et al. Agronomy 2018. doi:10.3390/agronomy8070112

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring paclobutrazol tended to decrease early yield.

Taxon: muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment: paclobutrazolt0
Outcome: early yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“but tended to decrease the early yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–600

t0
“Paclobutrazol—A Plant Growth Retardant for Increasing Yield and Fruit Quality in Muskmelon”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90

Title

Paclobutrazol—A Plant Growth Retardant for Increasing Yield and Fruit Quality in Muskmelon

Haim Nerson; Ron Cohen; Menahem Edelstein; et al. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1989. doi:10.21273/jashs.114.5.762

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Spring transplant drench with paclobutrazol increased total fruit yield by 15% to 20%.
Intervention effect Paclobutrazol increased fruit weight rather than fruit number.
Intervention effect Paclobutrazol generally tended to improve marketable yield, yield concentration and netting index.
Intervention effect Autumn paclobutrazol reduced early leaf yellowing but was less effective than BA.
Intervention effect Autumn paclobutrazol did not affect yield or yield components.
Intervention effect Autumn paclobutrazol significantly increased soluble solids content.
Intervention effect Autumn paclobutrazol left keeping quality unaffected.

Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced pod number accounted for the yield decrease.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxt0
Outcome: decrease in seed yielde0
Qualifier: decrease in number of pods per plante0

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in seed yield observed in both experimentsmore » was due to a decrease in number of pods per plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1275

t0
“soybeans”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103

Title

Comparison of experimental designs to determine effects of acidic precipitation on field-grown soybeans

Levi Evans; Keith F. Lewin; M Patti; et al. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1982

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Simulated acidic rain at pH 4.1 reduced soybean seed yield by 10.7 relative to pH 5.6.
Intervention effect Simulated acidic rain at pH 3.3 reduced soybean seed yield by 16.8 relative to pH 5.6.
Intervention effect Simulated acidic rain at pH 2.7 reduced soybean seed yield by 22.9% relative to pH 5.6.
Association Seed yield had a strong positive relation with rain pH in the first experiment.
Intervention effect In the unshielded experiment, pH 4.1 reduced soybean yield by 2.7 relative to pH 5.6.
Intervention effect In the unshielded experiment, pH 3.3 reduced soybean yield by 7.0 relative to pH 5.6.
Intervention effect In the unshielded experiment, pH 2.7 reduced soybean yield by 7.6 relative to pH 5.6.
Association In the second experiment seed mass rose with rain pH with a correlation coefficient of 0.97.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The largest maize yield decrease occurred with early August sowing.

Taxon: MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment: initial sowing of Auguste0
Outcome: decreasee0
Direction: biggeste0
Setting: Auguste0

Verbatim

e0
“The biggest decrease took place in the initial sowing of August”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–819

t0
“WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78

Title

WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST

CLÍSTENES ANTÔNIO GUADAGNIN; EDGAR RICARDO SCHOFFEL; HELVIO DEBLI CASALINHO; et al. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo 2017. doi:10.18512/1980-6477/rbms.v16n1p61-71

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation The Isareg model estimated average maize grain yield decrease of 25.1%.
Observation The smallest maize yield decrease occurred with late January to February sowings.
Observation Yield decrease varied by up to 3.9% among maturation cycles.
Method / resource Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease.
Method / resource Isareg overestimated yield decrease when relative evapotranspiration exceeded 0.8.
Observation A 40% grain yield decrease had a 10.5% occurrence probability.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-rice yield tended to decrease with time compared with early-rice yield.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Outcome: late-rice yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: early-rice yielde0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

t0
“Rice Field”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64

e0
“late-rice yield tended to decrease, compared with early-rice yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–440

Title

Yield Trends and Reasons for Their Change in Red-soil Rice Field with Long-term Organic Matter Circling

Xie Xiao-li 2007

Other claims from this paper (8)

Associationobservedreview summarynegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition can decrease alfalfa yield.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Interactor: Weedse0weed
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Weeds compete with alfalfa for water, nutrients, light, and space. This competition can decrease yields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–103

Title

Weed Management in Alfalfa

William W. Witt UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) 1983

Other claims from this paper (4)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods per plant were chiefly responsible for yield decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage: podse0
Outcome: yield decreasee0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“the component most responsible for yield decrease was the number of pods per plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1030

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–137

Title

The Interaction of Sowing Date and Water Availability in Determining Plant Architecture, Fruiting Pattern and Yield Components of Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)

P. Ceccon; L. Dalla Costa; R. Giovanardi; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 1994. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.1994.tb00552.x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Water shortage restricted crop evapotranspiration.
Intervention effect Water shortage restricted water uptake depth.
Intervention effect Low water availability reduced architecture traits.
Intervention effect Late sowing reduced architecture traits.
Intervention effect Late sowing shifted stem seed allocation downward.
Intervention effect Reduced water supply shifted stem seed allocation downward.
Intervention effect Water stress only slightly affected unit seed weight.
Intervention effect Early sown soybean lost more yield under reproductive phase water shortage.
Intervention effect Late sown soybean lost more yield under vegetative phase water shortage.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics