View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result positive projected Claim · model-written summary
Future drought losses around flowering decrease to about 9% of water-limited yield .
Outcomelosses from drought e0 Valueabout 9% of water limited yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “losses from drought around flowering will decrease and account for about 9% of water limited yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–478 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Heavy fertilization prevented a marked vegetable yield decrease in raw subsoil.
Treatmentheavily fertilized e0 Directiondid not decrease remarkably e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield s of vegetable crops did not decrease remarkably in the raw subsoil when it was heavily fertilized ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1610 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Super rice had more yield increase or less decrease under AWD than check rice.
Outcomemore increase or less decrease e0 Directionmore increase or less decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with more increase or less decrease for super rice than for check rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1172 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect hypothesis original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Additive dry matter gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass caused by weed competition.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “additive DM gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass and reduce herbicide cost ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1135 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The biomass yield rate decrease was smaller in S1 than ATP.
Outcomedecrease in biomass yield rate e0 Directionrelatively less e0 Verbatim
e0 “Per cent of decrease in biomass yield rate and CMS was relatively less in S1 than in ATP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–509 t0 “mulberry (Morus alba L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–61 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nongda 108 maize yield did not decrease under recommended nicosulfuron.
Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of the sensitive maize variety (Ditian 8) decrease d by 37.09%, whereas that of the resistant maize variety (Nongda 108) did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1170 t0 “nicosulfuron ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Eight alleles favored yield increase and ASI decrease together.
Verbatim
e0 “Eight alleles were selected for their favourable concurrent effect on yield increase and ASI decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1306 t0 “maize inbred lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–56 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
The smallest maize yield decrease occurred with late January to February sowings.
Treatmentlate sowings between January and February e0 Verbatim
e0 “the smallest in the late sowings between January and February ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–885 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping limited the weed-related maize yield decrease to 16%.
Treatmentintercropping with cowpea e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “intercropping with cowpea reduced this to only a 16% decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1031 t0 “maize ( Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–91 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield decrease by 29%.
Treatmentapplying mycorrhizal fungi e0 Interactormycorrhizal fungi e0 symbiont Outcomegrain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that seed yield reduced the by 42% under weedy conditions and applying mycorrhizal fungi compensated the grain yield decrease by 29%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–825 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.