Claim · model-written summary
Delayed planting decreased yield by 9% in both groups, with a highly significant planting date effect.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Both groups showed a 9% decrease in yield due to delayed planting. The planting date effect was highly significant”
t0“Soybean”
Title
Effect of Early and Late Flowering on Agronomic Traits of Soybean at Different Planting Dates1
T. W. Pfeiffer; D. Pilcher Crop Science 1987. doi:10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183x002700010027x
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Observation The early flowering group flowered 10 days earlier than the late flowering group.
- Observation Group EF matured 1 day earlier than group LF.
- Observation Group LF was taller and had more nodes at R1, R4 and R7 at both planting dates.
- Observation Flowering to pod initiation was shorter in group LF than group EF.
- Observation Seed filling was shorter in group LF than group EF.
- Observation Early planted group EF yielded 1510 kg ha−1.
- Observation Early planted group LF yielded 1520 kg ha−1.
- Observation Late planted group EF yielded 1370 kg ha−1.
- Observation Late planted group LF yielded 1380 kg ha−1.
- Observation The flowering group effect and its interaction with planting date were nonsignificant for yield.
- Intervention effect In 1983 and 1984, delayed planting reduced group LF yield by 6%.
- Intervention effect In 1983 and 1984, delayed planting reduced group EF yield by 17%.
- Observation Group LF did not yield significantly more in late plantings despite significant interaction in 1983 and 1984.
- Observation The two flowering groups did not differ in yield in late plantings in 1982.