View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The combined PGP spraying and soil MSAD treatment showed only a tendency for decrease d leaf area index (p = 0.058).
the combined treatment of spraying the plants with PGPs and treating the soil with MSADs e1 leaf area index (LAI) e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “common buckwheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 174–190 e1 “the combined treatment of spraying the plants with PGPs and treating the soil with MSADs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1299 e2 “indicated a tendency for a decrease in the leaf area index (LAI) (p = 0.058) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1470 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
HLB had no significant effect on N:P ratio in live leaves, resorption efficiency or fruit yield in C. maxima .
N:P ratio in live leaves and resorption efficiency as well as on fruit yield e1 no significant effects e1 healthy plants e2 Verbatim
e1 “However, for C. maxima plants, HLB had no significant effects on N:P ratio in live leaves and resorption efficiency as well as on fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1156 e2 “P resorption efficiency substantially decrease d in infected C. reticulata plants relative to the healthy plants in summer, which may account for the marked decrease in the average fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–925 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The combined PGP spraying and soil MSAD treatment showed only a tendency for decrease d NDVI (p = 0.186).
the combined treatment of spraying the plants with PGPs and treating the soil with MSADs e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “common buckwheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 174–190 e1 “the combined treatment of spraying the plants with PGPs and treating the soil with MSADs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1299 e2 “a tendency for a decrease in the leaf area index (LAI) (p = 0.058) and the NDVI (p = 0.186) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1495 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cassava bacterial blight resistance genetic gain was -0.03% per year and was not statistically significant.
cassava bacterial blight disease resistance e0 decrease inferred e0 Verbatim
e0 “The genetic gain per year was 1.3% for fresh root yield , 1.2% for dry root yield , 0.65% for cassava mosaic disease resistance, 0.21% for cassava anthracnose disease resistance, and -0.03% for cassava bacterial blight disease resistance. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–900 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
On a leaf-area basis, quantum yield , light compensation point and light saturation point did not change significantly.
increasing DLI e2 α, LCP, and the light saturation point (LSP) e0 did not change e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “On a leaf area basis, α, LCP, and the light saturation point (LSP) did not change significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1033 e1 “wax begonia ( Begonia semperflorens-cultorum Hort.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–323 e2 “There was a small decrease in leaf chlorophyll concentration (6.3%, measured in SPAD units) with increasing DLI ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1226 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The summer maize yield response to N rate under Treatment B was not significant.
summer maize yields e4 Verbatim
e0 “root distributions and N utilization efficiency of summer maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–244 e4 “With increases in N application rate, the effect on summer maize yield s increase under Treatment B were not significantly, and only BN3 increased by 0.4%, while under Treatments S were found to first increase, and then decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1175 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thinning beyond 18 cm did not significantly change fruit weight or quality.
‘Redspur Delicious’ apple e0 t0 e1 thinning fruit further than 18 cm apart e0 t0 e1 fruit weight or quality e0 t0 e1 without a significant change e0 t0 e1 18 cm fruit spacing e0 t0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “thinning fruit further than 18 cm apart reduced yield without a significant change in the fruit weight or quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1042 t0 “‘Redspur Delicious’ apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 e1 “Fruit weight and quality was improved with 18 cm fruit spacing without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–921 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum, iron and manganese contents in alfalfa.
Spraying cobalt sulfate e2 molybdenum,iron,manganese e3 no significant influence e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase dry grass yield of Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–480 e2 “Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase cobalt and zinc contents, decrease boron and selenium contents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–714 e3 “had no significant influence on molybdenum,iron,manganese and copper contents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–796 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Neither sulphur dioxide, water supply nor sulphur content of the nutrient supply affected alfalfa nitrogen content.
sulphur dioxide e1 nitrogen content e1 no_change inferred e1 water supply, nor sulphur content of nutrient supply e1 Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “neither sulphur dioxide, water supply, nor sulphur content of nutrient supply had significant effect on nitrogen content of the alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1785 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Se-Zn had no significant effect on POD activity.
no significantly effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Se-Zn could markedly improve the activities of GSH-Px and CAT,and decrease the activity of SOD,but had no significantly effect on POD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–696 e1 “alfalfa leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–267 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Fagopyrum esculentumt0
Citrus maxima
Manihot esculenta
Begonia
Zea mays
Medicago sativa