View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Super rice had more yield increase or less decrease under AWD than check rice.
more increase or less decrease e0 more increase or less decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with more increase or less decrease for super rice than for check rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1172 Other claims from this paper (15) Association author interpretation original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall variability and rising temperatures explain the projected maize yield decrease at Bako and Melkassa
rainfall variability and rising temperatures e3 Bako and Melkassa e3 Verbatim
e0 “maize yield s will decrease by up to 43 and 24% by the end of the century at Bako and Melkassa stations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1063 e3 “rainfall variability and rising temperatures are determining factors explaining yield decrease in Bako and Melkassa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1275 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario A1 mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% in future periods.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect hypothesis original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Additive dry matter gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass caused by weed competition.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “additive DM gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass and reduce herbicide cost ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1135 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation in the reproductive stage caused a greater decrease in soybean yield components.
reproductive stage e5 yield components e5 greater decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Soybean yield depends on photosynthesis generated by leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 e5 “defoliation has a negative effect on all cultivars yield components with greater decrease when it occurs in the reproductive stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1239 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped soybean had a 94% decrease in grain yield compared with soybean monoculture.
soybean monoculture e1 Verbatim
e1 “its competitive dominance shaded 80%–90% of incident light for intercropped soybean at canopy closure, leading to a 94% decrease in grain yield compared to soybean monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1030 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Phytoplasma infection was accompanied by a large final yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The phytoplasma infection also stimulated significant reductions in mRWC of the symptomatic leaves, with a final large decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1498 t0 “grapevine (Vitis vinifera ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heavy premature heading could decrease yield by 12-14%.
Rice Peiliangyou Teqing t0 premature heading e0 Verbatim
e0 “Heavy premature heading could cause reduced spikelet number per panicle and 1000-grain weight,and decrease the yield by a margin of 12-14% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–695 t0 “Rice Peiliangyou Teqing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–96 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Removal of 50% of the head produced the maximum seed yield decrease of 62.2%.
50% removal of the head e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The maximum decrease in seed yield (62.2%) was observed in the treatment of 50% removal of the head. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–889 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease seed yield per plant.
basal 25% defoliation e0 seed yield plant-1 e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays_from_India.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Mangifera indica
Glycine max
Vitis
Candidatus Phytoplasma
Helianthus annuus.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Vigna radiata