View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum did not increase peanut yield .
TreatmentGypsum application e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Gypsum application did not decrease pod rot, or increase yield or pod calcium content. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1135 t0 “Peanut Pod Rot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing 1% infected seed did not significantly reduce seed yield .
Treatmentsowing 1% infected seed e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “sowing 1% infected seed did not significantly decrease seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1614 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in chloroplast quantum yield could not be attributed to differences in respiration rates, chlorophyll content or absorption spectrum.
Qualifiercould not be attributed to differences in rates of respiration by the leaves or the chlorophyll content or absorption spectrum e5 Verbatim
e0 “Quantum yield s were measured for CO(2) fixation by sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) leaves having various water potentials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 e5 “The decrease could not be attributed to differences in rates of respiration by the leaves or the chlorophyll content or absorption spectrum of the leaves and chloroplasts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–980 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease from water deficit applied post-veraison was not obvious compared with the contrast treatment of Himrod table grape.
Treatmentregulating deficit irrigation of water deficit occurred post-veraison e5 Comparatorcontrast treatment e5 Settingprotected cultivation condition e0 Verbatim
e0 “Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 e5 “The leaf water potentials of contrast treatment were higher than the others. Alternate partial root-zone irrigation method and water deficit during pre-veraison reduced yield significantly, however, the yield decrease caused by regulating deficit irrigation of water deficit occurred post-veraison was not obvious as compared with the contrast treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2584 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing FeEDDHA did not decrease soybean dry matter yield at 24°C.
TreatmentIncreasing the FeEDDHA concentration from 0.2 to 2 mg of Fe kg −1 e1 Outcomedry matter yield e1 Qualifierbut not at 24°C e1 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–32 e1 “Increasing the FeEDDHA concentration from 0.2 to 2 mg of Fe kg −1 decrease d dry matter yield at 15 but not at 24°C. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–660 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield of rice did not decrease at all seed rates in 1989 and at more than 400 seeds/m2 in 1990 when clonal tillers were removed after 60 days to transplant the equivalent or double the uprooted plot area.
Treatmentclonal tillers were removed after 60 days e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “There was no decrease in the yield of crops sown at all seed rates in 1989 and at > 400 seeds/m 2 in 1990 when clonal tillers were removed after 60 days to transplant either the equivalent of or double the uprooted plot area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–985 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat protein concentration did not decrease significantly across released cultivars.
Outcomeprotein concentration e2 Verbatim
e2 “At the same time, there was no significant decrease in wheat protein concentration. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–861 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A 20% reduction in farmer-practice nitrogen did not reduce rice yield .
Treatmentreducing farmers’ practice N by 20% e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing farmers’ practice N by 20% did not decrease rice yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–969 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Earlier water deficit did not decrease thousand-grain weight.
Treatmentprevious water deficit e0 Outcome1000-grain weight e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The previous water deficit did not decrease 1000-grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1162 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
P. radicicola inoculation did not significantly reduce wheat grain yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “nor any significant decrease in grain yield of inoculated wheat grown to maturity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1314 t0 “Phialophora radicicola ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–45 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.