View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Traffic on extremely compacted soil caused an additional yield decrease that was not significant in the first year.
Treatmentharvest traffic e0 Qualifierextremely compacted soil e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “When harvest traffic was applied to alfalfa grown in extremely compacted soil there was an additional decrease in yield . It was not statistically significant the 1st yr ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1458 Other claims from this paper (13) Mechanism observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower seed yield in later fruit was mainly due to lower mean seed weight.
Organ / stagelater fruits e0 Qualifierdecrease in mean seed weight e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in seed yield in later fruits was due mainly to a decrease in mean seed weight rather than a decrease in the number of seeds per fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–964 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Potential soybean yield would decrease in most parts of China due to direct aerosol radiation effects.
Treatmentdirect aerosol radiation effects e1 Outcomepotential yields e1 Settingmost parts of China e1 Verbatim
e1 “the potential yield s of soybean would decrease in most parts of China due to direct aerosol radiation effects ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–538 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield reduction was associated with an approximately 25% decrease in individual fresh fruit weight.
Outcomeindividual fresh fruit weight e0 Verbatim
t0 “Tomatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 e0 “This yield reduction was not caused by the fruit number, but by an approximately 25% decrease in individual fresh fruit weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–916 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under limiting Zn, grain yield tended to decrease as young-tissue P concentration increased.
Qualifierincreasing P concentrations in young plant tissues e0 Not reported Material Gene Interactor Interactor role Treatment Comparator Setting Value
Verbatim
e0 “When Zn was limiting, grain yield s tended to decrease with increasing P concentrations in young plant tissues. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1155 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The projected maize yield decrease was greater under RCP8.5 than RCP4.5.
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in maize yield under RCP8.5 was predicted to be greater than that under RCP4.5. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1582 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Rice yield tended to decrease as continual direct sowing continued and soil nitrogen supply fell.
Treatmentcontinuance of direct sowing culture e0 Qualifierfall of nitrogen supplying potentiality of soil e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was observed a tendency of rice yield decrease by the continuance of direct sowing culture accompanied with the fall of nitrogen supplying potentiality of soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1603 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading at all three stages caused a significant decrease in both yield and grain weight of winter wheat.
TreatmentShading at all three stages e0 Outcomeyield and grain weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 e0 “Shading at all three stages caused a significant decrease in both yield and grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–692 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment with 150 mM NaCl led to a significant decrease in tomato yield .
Verbatim
t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134 e0 “plants treated with 150Mm NaCl also produced much smaller fruits than control leading to significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1159 Other claims from this paper (9) Association author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Grass cover crops not properly managed decrease crop yield
Taxongrass-based cover crops t0 Treatmentnot properly managed e2 Qualifiercompete with cash crops, immobilize soil N e2 Verbatim
t0 “grass-based cover crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 e2 “if not properly managed, grass cover crops can compete with cash crops, immobilize soil N, and decrease crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1244 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.