Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

An interannual increase in oilseed rape proportion had no significant effect on yield or parasitism rate.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0
Treatment
interannual increase in the proportion of OSRe4
Outcome
yield or parasitism ratee4
Direction
had no significant effecte4

Verbatim

e0

“the proportion of oilseed rape (OSR) fields in a landscape and the annual increase or decrease in OSR cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–537
e4

“An interannual increase in the proportion of OSR led to the dilution of pest species, but had no significant effect on yield or parasitism rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1523

Title

Biological pest control and yields depend on spatial and temporal crop cover dynamics

Gudrun Schneider; Jochen Krauss; Verena Riedinger; et al. Journal of Applied Ecology 2015. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12471

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting the phosphorus fertilizer caused an insignificant increase in sugar beet root yield.

Treatment
Splitting the phosphorus fertilizere2
Outcome
root yielde2
Direction
Increasee2
Setting
Sakha Agricultural Research Station Farme1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“using sugar beet (Beta vulgares) to asses the effects of seedling methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–214
e1

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural Research Station Farm during the two successive winter seasons of 2004 and 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–140
e2

“Splitting the phosphorus fertilizer caused Insignificant Increase in the root yield and significantly decrease in the top yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1465

Title

RESPONSE OF SUGAR BEET TO DIFFERENT SEEDLlNG METHODS, PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT AND SPRAYING WITH SOME NUTRIENTS

R.E. Knany; A.S. M. EI.Saady; R.H. Atia; et al. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2005. doi:10.21608/jssae.2005.238821

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid did not significantly affect plant or ear height.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
humic acid applicatione0
Outcome
plant height and ear heighte0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“humic acid application resulted in significant decrease in days to 50% tasseling and silking but did not affect plant height and ear height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–863
t0

“EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID AND MICRONUTRIENTS FOLIAR FERTILIZATION ON YIELD, YIELD COMPONENTS AND NUTRIENTS UPTAKE OF MAIZE IN CALCAREOUS SOILS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–137

Title

EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID AND MICRONUTRIENTS FOLIAR FERTILIZATION ON YIELD, YIELD COMPONENTS AND NUTRIENTS UPTAKE OF MAIZE IN CALCAREOUS SOILS

Maha Balbaa; A. Awad Journal of Plant Production 2013. doi:10.21608/jpp.2013.73071

Other claims from this paper (12)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant SQI variation was observed for HDI_PM in 2020 in topsoil or subsoil relative to the initial condition.

Treatment
HDI_PMe0
Outcome
SQIe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“no significant variations in the SQI were observed for HDI_PM in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1315

Title

Film mulching can alleviate soil quality decrease and produce high maize yield under different irrigation strategies

Hao Quan; Lihong Wu; Jiaming Sun; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2024. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109221

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron oxide waste at 5 or 25 g per kg soil did not significantly change the yield of young wheat in either soil.

Taxon
young wheate2
Treatment
treated with 0, 5 or 25 g iron oxide per kg soile2
Outcome
yield of young wheate2
Direction
No significant differencese2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the acidic waste to decrease the pH of two sandy soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–348
e2

“No significant differences were observed in the yield of young wheat in either soil treated with 0, 5 or 25 g iron oxide per kg soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–568

Title

Acidic iron oxide waste as a conditioner for calcareous soils

R. Campbell; R. D. O'Brien; M. V. Fey South African Journal of Plant and Soil 2002. doi:10.1080/02571862.2002.10634466

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

paddy rice showed no difference in P use efficiency of grain yield production as P increased under DC.

Taxon
paddy ricee0
Treatment
increase of P levele0
Outcome
P use efficiency of grain yield productione0
Direction
no differencee0
Setting
DCe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under DC, with the increase of P level, both upland rice and paddy rice significantly increased grain yield and P accumulation, and upland rice showed a significant decrease and paddy rice had no difference in P use efficiency of matter production and P use efficiency of grain yield production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–830

Title

Effects of Interaction between Phosphorus Nutrition and Cultivation Methods on Grain Yield and Phosphorus Utilization of Upland Rice and Paddy Rice

Zhang Ya ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2011

Other claims from this paper (19)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2013 (maize) yield at permanent tramlines was 13% lower than in the non-trafficked parts of the field, not statistically significant.

Taxon
maize corne1
Treatment
permanent tramlinese2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
13%e0
Qualifier
statistically not significante0
Comparator
non trafficked parts of the fielde0
Setting
Slovakiae3

Verbatim

e0

“13% (statistically not significant) compared to the non trafficked parts of the field in 2012 and 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1509
e1

“The study was done when growing winter wheat, spring barley and maize corn in 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1176
e2

“yield performance of permanent tramlines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1343
e3

“The study was conducted at University farm in Kolinany (Slovakia, Central Europe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–999

Title

Yield performance of controlled traffic farming permanent tramlines

Jana Galambosova; Miroslav Macak; Vladimir Rataj; et al. 2014 ASABE Annual International Meeting 2014. doi:10.13031/aim.20142005820

Other claims from this paper (3)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Rawalpindi, total nitrogen fixation decreased slightly as tillage intensity decreased, without a significant difference.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
tillage intensitye0
Outcome
totalnitrogenfixatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
Rawalpindisitee0

Verbatim

e0

“At Rawalpindisite,thoughtotalnitrogenfixationslightlydecreased with decrease in tillage intensity , thedifferences were statistically non significant .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–968
e1

“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–248

Title

Mungbean (Vigna radiata) yield and di-nitrogen fixation under minimum tillage at semi arid Pothwar, Pakistan.

Sajid Ali; A. Hasan; S. S. Ijaz; et al. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 2013

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum accumulation in alfalfa.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Spraying cobalt sulfatee6
Outcome
accumulation of molybdenume7
Direction
no significant influencee7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase dry grass yield of Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–480
e6

“Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly decrease the accumulation amount of selenium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1254
e7

“had no significant influence on the accumulation of molybdenum in Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1332

Title

Effect of Spraying Cobalt Sulfate on the Yield and Absorption of Trace Elements in Alfalfa

Jie Xiao-lei Anhui nongye kexue 2007

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I3 did not significantly reduce production relative to CK.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
I3 treatmente0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96
e0

“Compared with the CK,at heading stage,I2 had the greatest decrease on grain yield by a factor of 24.45% while I3 treatment did not significantly reduce production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1229

Title

Effect of water deficit at different growth stages on growth,yield and water use of spring maize in Hexi area

Peng Zhang Journal of Northwest A & F University 2013

Other claims from this paper (6)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.