View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
In simulation, a 5 C decrease in maximum temperature enhanced yield by up to 19.2%.
a −5°C decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 e0 “a −5°C decrease enhanced yield s by up to 19.2% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1085 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decrease in fruit set percent led to a reduction in total yield per plant.
total yield per plant e0 Decrease in fruit set percent e0 Verbatim
e0 “Decrease in fruit set percent led to reduction in the total yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1293 t0 “Capsicum annuum
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pethoxamid did not decrease rice yield
nontreated control e1 Verbatim
e1 “A reduction in rice shoot density and plant height compared to the nontreated control followed the use of pethoxamid ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1216 e2 “however, no decrease in yield resulted ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1256 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Yield was predicted to decrease with more backcrosses to the primitive accession.
more cycles of backcrossing to the accession e0 Verbatim
e0 “yield was predicted to decrease with more cycles of backcrossing to the accession ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–809 e1 “Primitive accessions of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DI and PRD did not significantly decrease yield .
did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “these treatments did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1556 t0 “lemon Fino 49 trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 e1 “DI and PRD decrease d stomatal conductance and photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1501 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At Manhattan in 2008, delayed planting did not decrease yield .
delayed planting e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 e0 “did not decrease at all with delayed planting in 2008 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1126 t1 “delayed planting dates and hybrids of varying maturity revealed that yield at Manhattan, KS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–998 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Espalier training with a trellis in high density hedgerows did not decrease yield .
training to an espalier shape e0 does not decrease e0 with and without a trellis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “olives ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 e0 “training to an espalier shape, with and without a trellis, in high density hedgerows, does not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–879 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive projected Claim · model-written summary
Future drought losses around flowering decrease to about 9% of water-limited yield .
losses from drought e0 about 9% of water limited yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “losses from drought around flowering will decrease and account for about 9% of water limited yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–478 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Heat waves tended to decrease bean yield to 333kg/ha.
Verbatim
e0 “heat waves tend to decrease cycle duration from one to three days and bean yield to 333kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–642 t0 “feijão ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield -optimal nitrogen rate tended to decrease as groundwater depth increased.
optimum N application rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The optimum N application rate corresponding to yield indicated a tendency to decrease with the WTD increase. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–1913 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Capsicum annuum
Oryza sativa
Gossypium hirsutum
Citrus
Zea mays subsp. mays
Olea