View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The leaf potassium decrease in Santorini Authentic was nonsignificant.
Verbatim
t0 “Greek Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 e0 “the nonsignificant decrease of the leaf potassium ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1008 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Insect pollination did not decrease Castanea henryi fruit quality.
indirect or direct pollination e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Castanea
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 e0 “Insects contributed 40% of fruit by their indirect or direct pollination and did not decrease fruit quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–446 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Crop residue substitution did not decrease maize grain yield compared with synthetic fertilizer.
without decreasing e0 Verbatim
e0 “CRNPK reduced total N losses by 21 % compared to NPK (38.0 vs. 48.3 kg N ha −1 ) without decreasing grain yield ( P < 0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1076 t0 “dryland maize production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–145 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit during later tillering did not significantly decrease rice yield compared with the check treatment.
water deficit during later tillering stage e1 not significantly decreased e1 check treatment e1 Verbatim
e1 “the yield of rice was not significantly decrease d and dry matter accumulation was slightly increased with water deficit during later tillering stage compared to check treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–408 t0 “dry matter of rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation did not decrease protein when fertilizers were applied.
no_change inferred e0 these fertilizers were applied e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “irrigation did not decrease the protein level when these fertilizers were applied. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–832 t0 “FIELD PEAS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–46 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Hoeing did not lower cereal yield versus herbicide or manual weeding.
no yield decrease e0 a conventional herbicide application or manual weeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “hoeing caused no yield decrease in comparison to a conventional herbicide application or manual weeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1196 t0 “Cereals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–52 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the no-reduction yield type after nitrogen decrease , the number of big and small vascular bundles of panicle necks and penultimate internodes in a stem did not differ significantly.
nitrogen decrease treatment e2 number of big and small vascular bundles of panicle necks and penultimate internodes in a stem e1 Verbatim
e1 “there was not significant differences in the number of big and small vascular bundles of panicle necks and penultimate internodes in a stem ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2212 e2 “After nitrogen decrease treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1817 e0 “erect panicle type rice variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The 0.5 times seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease cotton or peanut yield .
0.5× seeding rate e4 did not decrease e4 the 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut) e5 Verbatim
e1 “at two seeding rates (1× and 0.5×) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–387 e4 “The 0.5× seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease yield in cotton or peanut and revenue above seed cost averaged $16 and $95/ha, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1005 e5 “the 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1193 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At 225 m3/hm2 per irrigation, the decrease in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and yield was not obvious.
decreasing of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and yield e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Tomato in Greenhouse ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 e5 “When the irrigation amount for each time was 225 m3/hm2,the decreasing of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and yield was not obvious,and the comprehensive benefit was highest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1024 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
TH656 did not decrease yield in Wilking mandarin
no_change inferred e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In fruit thinning experiments performed during the June, 1970 drop period in mandarin ( Citrus reticulata Blanco cv. Wilking) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–134 e3 “A new thinning agent, 1-(α-naphthaleneacetyl)-3,5 dimethyl-pyrazole (TH656) applied at 160 ppm, brought about a significant increase in fruit size without decreasing yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–619 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Solanum lycopersicumt0
Castanea
Zea mays
Oryza sativa
Gossypium hirsutum
Arachis hypogaea.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Citrus reticulata