View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield may decrease in the hottest Australian grape regions.
Verbatim
e0 “an increase in yield s may be expected in the coolest regions, while a decrease may be expected in the hottest regions. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1183 t0 “grape yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease from insect infestation was greater in Centennial than in the other genotype.
TreatmentInsect infestation e1 Outcomedecrease in Centennial yield e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Susceptibility of Selected Soybean Genotypes to Soybean Looper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–89 e1 “Insect infestation significantly reduced yield of both genotypes, but the decrease in Centennial yield was greater ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1397 e0 “Pseudoplusia includens ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–432 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging at the tillering stage caused the greatest yield penalty, a 10%–15% decrease .
Organ / stagetillering stage e1 Treatmentwaterlogging at the tillering stage e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “waterlogging in winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–71 e1 “the greatest yield penalties occurred by waterlogging at the tillering stage (10%–15% decrease ), followed by the jointing stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–292 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Upper-third defoliation caused the largest seed yield decrease relative to control.
Treatmentupper 1/3 defoliation e0 Directionhighest decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the highest decrease in the seed yield compared to the control were observed in the upper 1/3 defoliation levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1228 t0 “Safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Corn yield will likely decrease under future conditions of increased summer temperature and drought.
Qualifierunder future climate conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “Given the regional GCM prediction for increased summer temperatures and summer drought, both corn and soybean yield will likely decrease under future climate conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1329 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield will likely decrease under future conditions of increased summer temperature and drought.
Qualifierunder future climate conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “Given the regional GCM prediction for increased summer temperatures and summer drought, both corn and soybean yield will likely decrease under future climate conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1329 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress may decrease the yield of aerobic rice.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “And the effect of four water regimes on phosphorus efficiency and water productivity of aerobic rice was studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–229 e7 “Water stress may decrease the yield of aerobic rice,but promote water productivity and phosphorus efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1162 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
A similar reduction of plant-available P would decrease crop yield by 8%.
Treatmentreduction of plant-available P e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e7 “a similar reduction of plant-available P would lead to a decrease in crop yield by 8% with an increase in P response efficiency by 83% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1411 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CoJ 64 showed the highest decrease in yield and juice quality attributes, confirming its sensitivity.
Outcomeyield and juice quality attributes e6 Qualifierconfirmed its sensitivity e6 Verbatim
t0 “Performance of sugarcane as ratoon crop under waterlogged conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 e6 “CoJ 64 genotype showed highest decrease in yield and juice quality attributes which confirmed its sensitivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1433 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Exotic introgression in BR106 led to in BR106 a yield decrease .
TreatmentExotic maize (#Zea mays # L.) inbreds e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in BR106 a yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–741 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 e1 “Exotic maize (#Zea mays # L.) inbreds were introgressed into two elite Brazilian populations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 e2 “two elite Brazilian populations -BR105 (Suwan 1) and BR106 (related to Tuxpeno) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–139 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.