View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Antagonistic treatments did not differ significantly in disease severity and yield in the third year.
disease severity percent and yield e1 Verbatim
e0 “these treatments were not different significantly in third year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–410 e1 “in terms of disease severity percent and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–318 t0 “Cucumber Fusarium Wilt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–51 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen fertilisation produced a slight nonsignificant increase in tuber yield .
N fertilisation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “An increase in N fertilisation did not lead to an increase in starch yield due to a decrease in starch content and a slight insignificant increase in tuber yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1792 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Formula fertilization did not significantly reduce tomato yield versus conventional fertilization despite lower N, P and K rates.
formula fertilization treatments e0 yields of tomato e0 did not decrease significantly e0 rates of N,P,and K fertilizer applied were decreased by 9%~40%,26%~46% and 18%~47% e0 conventional fertilization treatment e0 Verbatim
e0 “in comparison with the conventional fertilization treatment,the yield s of tomato of formula fertilization treatments did not decrease significantly when the rates of N,P,and K fertilizer applied were decrease d by 9%~40%,26%~46% and 18%~47%,respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–874 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under most conditions sulphur dioxide had no significant effect on alfalfa yield .
sulphur dioxide e0 no significant effect e1 under most of the conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “under most of the conditions it had no significant effect on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–583 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Six cycles of selection caused no significant reduction in grain yield .
six cycles of selection e0 no significant reduction e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Over six cycles of selection a 14‐day decrease in days to flowering was obtained with no significant reduction in grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–481 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation did not significantly affect seed number per pod or thousand seed weight in B. campestris and B. juncea .
seed number per pod and thousand‐seed weight e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “In B. campestris and B. juncea , a decrease in seed yield by defoliation was associated with a decrease in the number of pods per plant as seed number per pod and thousand‐seed weight were not significantly affected by this treatment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–401 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic products did not significantly increase marketable pepper yield .
organic products e0 marketable yield e0 did not increase e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “While the organic products did not increase marketable yield significantly, they did decrease overall damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1632 e1 “The pepper weevil, Anthonomus eugenii Cano (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a major pest of pepper (Capsicum spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–111 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Potassium with optimal zinc and phosphorus did not significantly affect wheat grain yield .
K application along with optimal Zn and P supply e1 without significantly affecting e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “without significantly affecting grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1649 e1 “K application along with optimal Zn and P supply to plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1480 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–119 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant weight of intercropped onion at 240 kg ha–1 nitrogen was not significantly decrease d compared with monocropping.
240 kg ha–1 nitrogen treatment e1 Verbatim
e1 “There wasn’t significant decrease in plant weight of intercropped onion at 240 kg ha–1 nitrogen treatment when compared to monocropping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1203 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Marketable yield did not differ significantly between 120 ppm N and 175 ppm N.
marketable yield e3 not a significant difference e3 Verbatim
t0 “PEPPERS GROWN IN ROCKWOOL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–94 e3 “there was not a significant difference in marketable yield between plants grown at 120 ppm N and 175 ppm N ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–897 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Cucumis sativust0
Solanum tuberosum
Solanum lycopersicum
Medicago sativa
Zea mays
Brassica juncea.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Anthonomus eugenii
Triticum aestivum
Allium cepa
Capsicum