Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was predicted to decrease with more backcrosses to the primitive accession.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment: more cycles of backcrossing to the accessione0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“yield was predicted to decrease with more cycles of backcrossing to the accession”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–809

e1
“Primitive accessions of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53

Title

Introgression of Day‐Neutral Genes in Primitive Cotton Accessions: II. Predicted Genetic Effects

J. C. McCarty; J. N. Jenkins; J. Zhu Crop Science 1998. doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800060003x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Association Accessions had significant effects on every studied trait.
Association Generation had significant main effects on three yield traits.
Association Generation had a significant main effect on one fiber trait.
Association Some traits had accession by generation interactions, indicating unequal generation effects.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Manhattan in 2008, delayed planting did not decrease yield.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: delayed plantinge0
Outcome: yieldt1
Direction: did not decreasee0
Qualifier: in 2008e0
Setting: Manhattan, KSt1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34

e0
“did not decrease at all with delayed planting in 2008”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1126

t1
“delayed planting dates and hybrids of varying maturity revealed that yield at Manhattan, KS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–998

Title

EFFECT OF DELAYED PLANTING ON CORN IN CENTRAL KANSAS

Aaron James Sindelar; Kraig L. Roozeboom K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) 2008

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect At Manhattan in 2007, yield did not decrease significantly until the final planting date.
Intervention effect At Belleville in 2007, later planting increased yield.
Intervention effect At Belleville in 2008, planting date did not affect yield.
Intervention effect At Hutchinson, yield decreased significantly with successive planting dates; the supplied sentence is cut off.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Espalier training with a trellis in high density hedgerows did not decrease yield.

Taxon: olivesOleat0
Treatment: training to an espalier shapee0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: does not decreasee0
Qualifier: with and without a trellise0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“olives”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56

e0
“training to an espalier shape, with and without a trellis, in high density hedgerows, does not decrease yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–879

Title

Mechanical harvesting of California table and oil olives

Louise Ferguson; Sergio Castro‐García; Joseph Burns; et al. Advances in Horticultural Science 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Future drought losses around flowering decrease to about 9% of water-limited yield.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage: floweringe0
Outcome: losses from droughte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: about 9% of water limited yielde0

Verbatim

e0
“losses from drought around flowering will decrease and account for about 9% of water limited yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–478

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47

Title

Local impacts of climate change on winter wheat in Great Britain

Thibaut Putelat; Andrew P. Whitmore; Nimai Senapati; et al. Royal Society Open Science 2021. doi:10.1098/rsos.201669

Other claims from this paper (5)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Heat waves tended to decrease bean yield to 333kg/ha.

Taxon: feijãot0
Treatment: heat wavese0
Outcome: bean yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 333kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0
“heat waves tend to decrease cycle duration from one to three days and bean yield to 333kg/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–642

t0
“feijão”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63

Title

Influência de ondas de calor no desempenho agronômico do feijão no município de Campos Novos, em Santa Catarina

Rosandro Boligon Minuzzi; Eduardo Pickius Ciência e Natura 2020. doi:10.5902/2179460x55303

Other claims from this paper (3)

Association Heat waves tended to decrease bean cycle duration by one to three days.
Association The effects of heat waves on bean biomass production were uncertain.
Association The effects of heat waves on bean water use efficiency were uncertain.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield-optimal nitrogen rate tended to decrease as groundwater depth increased.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: optimum N application ratee0
Direction: decreasee0
Setting: WTDe0

Verbatim

e0
“The optimum N application rate corresponding to yield indicated a tendency to decrease with the WTD increase.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–1913

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47

Title

Effects of nitrogen application on winter wheat growth, water use, and yield under different shallow groundwater depths

Yingjun She; Ping Li; Xuebin Qi; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1114611

Other claims from this paper (11)

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in seed setting rate was the main contribution to the decrease in grain yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Outcome: grain yieldse7
Direction: decreasee7
Qualifier: decrease in seed setting ratee7

Verbatim

t0
“elevated temperature effects on rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–158

e7
“The main contribution to the significant decrease of the grain yields was the decrease in seed setting rate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1476

Title

A hot-blast warming facility for simulating global warming in low-stature crop systems and its application case to assess elevated temperature effects on rice in Central China

Zuolin Zhang; Zhiyuan Yang; Shah Fahad; et al. Plant Methods 2020. doi:10.1186/s13007-020-00598-1

Other claims from this paper (11)

Method / resource The facility could increase rice canopy temperature by up to 1–2 °C.
Method / resource The facility had a power consumption of 0.164 kW/m2.
Method / resource The facility power consumption was 80% lower than that of Free Air Temperature Increase.
Method / resource The facility built a 25 m2 homogeneous heating area.
Intervention effect The facility had little effect on relative humidity in a paddy field.
Intervention effect Warming treatments significantly reduced rice grain yield by 4.4–22.7% in 2015 compared with the control.
Intervention effect Warming treatments significantly reduced rice grain yield by 30.8–61.9% in 2016 compared with the control.
Mechanism A reduction of 1000-grain weight led to a decline in grain yield.
Method / resource The increasing ranges of the temperature simulated by HBWF were stable across years.
Association Differences among elevated treatments in rice growth were mainly decided by the basic atmospheric temperature.
Recommendation The new warming facility is suitable for field trials assessing elevated temperature combinations.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy fertilization prevented a marked vegetable yield decrease in raw subsoil.

Taxon: vegetable cropse0
Treatment: heavily fertilizede0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: did not decrease remarkablye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the yields of vegetable crops did not decrease remarkably in the raw subsoil when it was heavily fertilized”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1610

Title

The effect of deep plowing on growth and yield of vegetable crops

H. OHTA; T. KODAMA; K. WATANABE Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 1962. doi:10.2503/jjshs.31.315

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deep plowing favored growth and yield of most vegetable crops.
Intervention effect Heavy fertilizer application made deep plowing more effective.
Intervention effect Raw subsoil was unfavorable to cereal and forage crop growth and yield.
Observation Most heavily fertilized vegetable crops were relatively insensitive to subsoil inhibition.
Intervention effect Frost-exposed, heavily fertilized subsoil supported excellent vegetable growth and yield.
Intervention effect Poor subsoil inhibited growth of most vegetables in pots.
Intervention effect Fertile subsoil with heavy fertilizer supported vigorous growth of most vegetables in pots.
Intervention effect Some crops grew better in subsoil than topsoil with the same fertilizer amount.
Association High yielding crops under deep plowing were less affected by poor subsoil nutrition.
Association Sensitivity to aluminum toxicity and nutrient deficiency was suggested to relate to subsoil adaptation.
Mechanism Good soil aeration after deep plowing was linked to root development and active nutrient uptake.

Observationauthor interpretationreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Imidazolinone herbicides decrease yield of subsequent rotation crops.

Taxon: subsequent cropse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasinge0

Verbatim

e0
“decreasing in the yield of subsequent crops in crop rotations”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–633

Title

Negative Effects of Imidazolinone Herbicides Usage: Problems and Desicions

V. V. Bychkova; I. A. Sazonova; P. S. Pidenko; et al. Агрохимия 2023. doi:10.31857/s0002188123020060

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulated deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield.

Taxon: olive treesOlea europaeae0
Treatment: RDI strategye3
Outcome: fruit yielde3
Direction: did not decreasee3
Comparator: full irrigatione6

Verbatim

e3
“The RDI strategy did not decrease the fruit yield despite the fact that olive weight tended to decrease, and it increased the oil yield by ~14.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1078

e6
“full irrigation (FI, 100% of ETc)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–447

e0
“olive trees cv Arbosana”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–585

Title

Ripening Indices, Olive Yield and Oil Quality in Response to Irrigation With Saline Reclaimed Water and Deficit Strategies

Cristina Romero-Trigueros; Gaetano Alessandro Vivaldi; Emilio Nicolás Nicolás; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2019. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01243

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Reclaimed water without water restriction increased olive fruit yield by 35% compared with control trees.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water without water restriction did not result in higher olive oil yield.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation tended to decrease olive weight.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation increased olive oil yield by about 14.5%.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation significantly reduced olive oil yield by 25% in 2018.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation strongly reduced oil content per fruit dry weight by 40%.
Intervention effect Both RDI treatments lowered acidity levels in olive paste compared with full irrigation treatments.
Intervention effect Both RDI treatments reduced oil extractability and fatty yield.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure decreased olive oil quality.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure reduced oleic acid in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure increased the C18:2/C18:3 ratio in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure increased peroxides in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water improved total polyphenols in olive.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation improved total polyphenols in olive.
Observation In all cases the olive oil parameters met the legislation.
Recommendation Reclaimed water and regulated deficit irrigation have potential to manage olive oil production.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics