View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Across cultivars, salinity-driven seedling leaf-area reduction correlated strongly with field yield decrease (r = 0.99).
Outcomedecrease in yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “For all cultivars, a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.99) was established between the influence of salinity on seedling leaf area reduction and on decrease in yield during field culture. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1046 t0 “Muskmelon Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–109 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield fell significantly with each unit decrease in seeding rate.
Treatmentrate of seeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “A significant reduction in yield existed per unit decrease on rate of seeding. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–592 t0 “YOUNG COB CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Climate change was associated with a significant average cotton yield efficiency decrease of 515 kg/ha.
Treatmentclimate change e1 Outcomeyield efficiency e0 Verbatim
t0 “Cotton Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–45 e0 “on the yield efficiency with an average decrease of 515 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–884 e1 “climate change has a significant negative impact at 1% level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–744 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The selection associated decrease s in yield and plant size were strongly correlated.
Outcomedecrease in yield e0 Comparatordecrease in plant size e0 Not reported Material
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in yield due to selection showed close association with decrease in plant size ( r = 0.98**, significant at P = 0.01), which probably reduced photosynthetic capacity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1407 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nutsedge density was associated with a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield
TreatmentIncreasing nutsedge density e0 Outcomeseed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus ) density on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–104 e0 “Increasing nutsedge density caused a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–315 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading at all three stages caused a significant decrease in both yield and grain weight of winter wheat.
TreatmentShading at all three stages e0 Outcomeyield and grain weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 e0 “Shading at all three stages caused a significant decrease in both yield and grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–692 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment with 150 mM NaCl led to a significant decrease in tomato yield .
Verbatim
t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134 e0 “plants treated with 150Mm NaCl also produced much smaller fruits than control leading to significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1159 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Unprotected B. campestris had a significant yield decrease .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “B. campestris a significant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–827 t0 “RESPONSE OF FOUR BRASSICA SEED CROP SPECIES TO ATTACK BY THE CRUCIFER FLEA BEETLE, PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 e1 “Nevertheless the unprotected B. juncea treatment yield ed as much as the protected; B. napus , however, suffered an apparent appreciable decrease and B. campestris a significant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–827 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One to three large alfalfa weevil larvae often caused a significant decrease in alfalfa yield .
Qualifierone to three large larvae e2 Verbatim
e0 “Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 e1 “The alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica (Gylenhall) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–184 e2 “one to three large larvae often cause a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–822 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Quantum yield varied significantly with oxygen partial pressure, with the greatest decrease at 2 kPa oxygen.
Treatment2 kPa of oxygen e0 Comparatoroxygen partial pressures e0 Verbatim
e0 “The quantum yield data showed significant variation among the oxygen partial pressures with the most significant decrease at 2 kPa of oxygen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–999 t0 “radish ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.