View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative-stage ozone exposure caused no significant fruit yield decrease at final harvest.
TreatmentO 3 exposure at the vegetative stage e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage, there was no significant decrease in fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–819 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing potassium to N60P60K30 did not significantly decrease soybean yield .
Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was no significant decrease in soybean yield in the variant of the experiment with a decrease in the proportion of potassium in the composition of complete mineral fertilizer (N60P60K30) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1646 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hercules close relatives had no significant decrease in oat grain yield .
Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The cultivar Hercules enhanced the test weight of its close relatives, with no significant decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1346 e1 “oat ( Avena saliva L.) genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–262 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by root-zone warming.
Verbatim
e0 “Rose cvs Ilona, Mercedes and Sonia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–41 e1 “There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by RZW ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1599 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear shading caused a slightly greater yield decrease for Proctor and Herta, without significant varietal differences.
Treatmentshading the ears e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in grain yield by shading the ears was slightly greater for Proctor and Herta, the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1781 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease dry matter or seed yield per plant.
Treatmentbasal 25% defoliation e0 OutcomeTDM and seed yield plant-1 e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
I. tinctoria showed no significant relative yield decrease despite the highest shoot Pb concentration.
Outcomerelative yield decrease e0 Directionno significant e0 Verbatim
e0 “The highest shoot Pb concentration was in I. tinctoria having no significant relative yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1048 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Surabyeo yield decrease at low nitrogen was not significant.
Comparator11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatment e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in yield was not significant in Surabyeo and Hwayeongbyeo compared with the 11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–570 t0 “on Rice Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hwayeongbyeo yield decrease at low nitrogen was not significant.
Comparator11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatment e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in yield was not significant in Surabyeo and Hwayeongbyeo compared with the 11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–570 t0 “on Rice Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Full season maize hybrids showed a nonsignificant yield decrease with maturity.
Materialfull season hybrids e0 Verbatim
e0 “non-significant decrease in grain yield with relative maturity in full season hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1130 t0 “Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–85 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.