View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield .
Outcomeinjure strawberry or decrease yield e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “provides PRE weed control in strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–150 e2 “Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–830 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Abiotic assaults decrease plant yield .
Treatmentabiotic assaults e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants are exposed continuously in their natural environment to diverse abiotic assaults throughout life, which leads to a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–140 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Maintaining a high proportion of double-flowered plants may decrease seed yield .
Verbatim
e0 “maintaining a high percentage of plants with double-flowered capitula may decrease seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–933 t0 “Zinnia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
F4 and F5 mungbean populations showed a slight grain yield decrease .
Directionslight decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “slight decrease in 'grain yield in subsequent populations of F4 and FS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–993 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–34 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars with the largest yield had the largest yield decrease from waterlogging.
MaterialCultivars with the largest yield e0 Directionlargest decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “UK wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 e0 “Cultivars with the largest yield suffered the largest decrease due to waterlogging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1176 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated foliar damage alone did not decrease grain yield .
Directiondid not decrease e0 Qualifierfoliar damage alone e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “foliar damage alone did not decrease grain yield but decrease d straw yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–754 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Damage around tasseling-anthesis caused the greatest yield decrease in forage maize.
Organ / stagetasseling‐anthesis e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Decrease of yield was the highest when treatments were applied around tasseling‐anthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–335 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The evaluated herbicides did not decrease durum wheat yield .
Treatmentherbicides evaluated e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was no decrease in durum wheat yield with the herbicides evaluated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1294 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result positive projected Claim · model-written summary
Probability of a yield decrease declined from 1.5 to 2.0 °C warming.
Outcomeprobability of a crop yield decrease e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the probability of a crop yield decrease would decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2179 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.