View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced tillage did not decrease sugar beet yield .
reduced tillage systems e0 did not result in either a yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The reduced tillage systems in sugar beet cultivation did not result in either a yield decrease or a worse technological quality of roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1704 t0 “sugar beets ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The jointing to spike formation stage was identified as the key period for UVB-related yield decrease .
jointing-spike formation e0 Verbatim
e0 “The key growing stage which cause the yield decrease is during the jointing-spike formation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–846 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Selection for nematode resistance did not decrease sugar beet root yield .
Selection for resistance to nematode e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Selection for resistance to nematode did not decrease root yield s. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–249 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection beginning at tillering or grain filling caused no observed yield loss or yield -component decrease .
tillering or grain filling e0 yield loss or decrease in yield components e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “No yield loss or decrease in yield components was observed when infection started at tillering or grain filling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1618 e1 “Sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani ) of rice (Oryza sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weak light during the seedling period caused a 28.1% decrease in guar bean yield .
seedling period e0 weak light conditions e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Guar Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 e0 “Providing weak light conditions during the seedling period mainly influences the plant shape,causing a 28.1% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1011 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario B1 mango yield is projected to decrease by 85.73% in future periods.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result projected Claim · model-written summary
Simulated crop yield changed under Decrease in temperature more than 2oC.
Decrease in temperature more than 2oC e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 e0 “Decrease in temperature more than 2oC decrease s crop yield by 10 to 20 g m-2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3574–3650 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
In simulation, a 5 C decrease in maximum temperature enhanced yield by up to 19.2%.
a −5°C decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 e0 “a −5°C decrease enhanced yield s by up to 19.2% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1085 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decrease in fruit set percent led to a reduction in total yield per plant.
total yield per plant e0 Decrease in fruit set percent e0 Verbatim
e0 “Decrease in fruit set percent led to reduction in the total yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1293 t0 “Capsicum annuum
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pethoxamid did not decrease rice yield
nontreated control e1 Verbatim
e1 “A reduction in rice shoot density and plant height compared to the nontreated control followed the use of pethoxamid ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1216 e2 “however, no decrease in yield resulted ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1256 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa
Rhizoctonia solani_from_India.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Mangifera indica
Glycine max
Capsicum annuum