Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Below CO2 uptake saturation, instantaneous fluorescence yield did not decrease during nonphotochemical quenching.

Taxon: Hedera helixHedera helixe1
Outcome: yield of instantaneous fluorescencee0
Direction: not accompanied by a decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“below light-saturation of CO(2) uptake nonphotochemical quenching occurred in the absence of zeaxanthin and was not accompanied by a decrease in the yield of instantaneous fluorescence.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–977

e1
“Intact attached sun leaves of Helianthus annuus and shade leaves of Monstera deliciosa and Hedera helix were used to obtain light response curves”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145

Title

Light Response of CO₂ Assimilation, Dissipation of Excess Excitation Energy, and Zeaxanthin Content of Sun and Shade Leaves

Barbara Demmig-Adams; Klaus Winter; Almuth Krüger; et al. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 1989. doi:10.1104/pp.90.3.881

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation The three species differed widely in light-saturated CO2 uptake capacity.
Observation The species reached CO2 uptake light saturation at different photon flux densities.
Observation Nonphotochemical quenching occurred below CO2 uptake saturation without zeaxanthin.
Observation Nonphotochemical quenching increased to 0.35–0.5.
Observation Nonphotochemical quenching increased again near CO2 uptake saturation.
Observation Leaf zeaxanthin content rose near CO2 uptake saturation.
Observation Instantaneous fluorescence yield began decreasing near CO2 uptake saturation.
Association Increasing zeaxanthin paralleled increasing radiationless energy dissipation.
Association The authors suggest zeaxanthin may relate to high-energy-state quenching.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated 75% defoliation before V7 did not decrease grain yield in the Maryland trial.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: defoliacióne0
Outcome: rendimientoe0
Direction: no disminuyóe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A pesar de la frecuente y alta defoliación en siete diferentes momentos, el rendimiento no disminuyó (P > 0.05).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–913

t0
“Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38

Title

Severe Defoliation of Vegetative Maize Plants Does Not Reduce Grain Yield: Further Implications with Action Thresholds

Carlos A. Blanco; Gerardo Hernandez; Kevin Conover; et al. Southwestern Entomologist 2023. doi:10.3958/059.048.0404

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observation Severe defoliation before V7 did not affect yield in 75 percent of empirical publications.
Intervention effect One V2 defoliation produced more grain than no defoliation.
Recommendation Authors recommend reconsidering insecticide use against defoliators before V7.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The measured soil quality decline had no significant effect on pasture or crop yield to date.

Taxon: pasturee0
Treatment: this measured decreasee0
Outcome: pasture or crop yielde0
Direction: no significant effecte0
Qualifier: this measured decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“this measured decrease has had no significant effect on pasture or crop yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1565

Title

The impact of land-use intensification on soil physical quality and plant yield response in the North Otago Rolling Downlands

D.J. Houlbrooke; J.D. Morton; R.J. Paton; et al. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 2006. doi:10.33584/jnzg.2006.68.2652

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 30% reduction of mineral nitrogen was possible without a decrease in biological and pure sugar yield.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
Treatment: reduce the mineral application of nitrogen by 30%e6
Outcome: biological and pure sugar yielde6
Direction: without a decreasee6
Comparator: full nitrogen mineral fertilizatione7

Verbatim

e1
“after the sugar beet harvest”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1035

e6
“it was possible to reduce the mineral application of nitrogen by 30% without a decrease in the biological and pure sugar yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1360

e7
“The nitrogen rates were reduced by 30% in comparison to full nitrogen mineral fertilization”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–821

Title

The Effect of Growth Activators and Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the Soil Properties, Root Yield, and Technological Quality of Sugar Beet

Arkadiusz Artyszak; Dariusz Gozdowski Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10091262

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring cabbage yield did not decrease under the reduced fertilizer application.

Taxon: spring cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
Treatment: N,P and K content of chemical fertilizer application was controlled within(20kg/666.7m~(2))e0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“when the N,P and K content of chemical fertilizer application was controlled within(20kg/666.7m~(2)) the yields of cherry tomato and spring cabbage did not decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–379

Title

Effects of Reducing Chemical Fertilizer Application on Yields and Nitrate Contents of Cherry Tomato and Spring Cabbage

Qiao Hongxia; Xiude Wang; Aifeng Zhu; et al. Shanghai nongye xuebao 2005

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Cherry tomato yield did not decrease when fertilizer N, P and K application was controlled within 20kg/666.7m~(2).
Intervention effect Reduced fertilizer application somewhat reduced cherry tomato nitrate contents.
Intervention effect Reduced fertilizer application somewhat reduced spring cabbage nitrate contents.
Intervention effect Adding foliage spray increased cherry tomato yield.
Intervention effect Adding foliage spray slightly raised cherry tomato nitrate content, remaining within the tolerance limit.
Intervention effect Adding foliage spray substantially increased spring cabbage nitrate content.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen from N90 to N60 did not decrease lettuce yield.

Taxon: LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment: N60e0
Outcome: crop yielde0
Direction: without decreasinge0
Comparator: N90 treatmente0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared to the N90 treatment, N2O emission of N60 was reduced by 42% in loam soil and 30% in deep sandy soil without decreasing crop yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1151

t0
“Lettuce”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

Title

Nitrogen Fertilization Management and Nitrous Oxide Emission in Lettuce Vegetable Fields in Central Vietnam

Hoang . International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2018. doi:10.17957/ijab/15.0484

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Cumulative N2O emissions increased in proportion to nitrogen fertilizer application.
Association Yield-based N2O intensity increased in proportion to nitrogen fertilizer application.
Intervention effect Calcium nitrate at 90 kg N ha -1 had the highest N2O emissions, 1.20 to 1.82 times ammonium sulfate.
Intervention effect Calcium nitrate at 90 kg N ha -1 had the highest N2O emissions, 1.60 to 1.91 times urea.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen from N90 to N60 cut N2O emissions by 42% in loam soil.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen from N90 to N60 cut N2O emissions by 30% in deep sandy soil.
Observation Growing-season N2O emission factors ranged from 0.40% to 0.61% of added nitrogen.
Association Growing-season N2O emission factors increased with nitrogen fertilizer rate.
Association N2O fluxes fell significantly as applied nitrogen fertilizer amounts decreased.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NDGA did not significantly decrease ABA content.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment: NDGAe0
Outcome: ABA contente0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65

e0
“NDGA inhibited the expression of ABA-responsive gene, but did not significantly decrease ABA content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–954

Title

Targeting Hormone-Related Pathways to Improve Grain Yield in Rice: A Chemical Approach

Hiroaki Tamaki; Maria Reguera; Yasser M. Abdel-Tawab; et al. PLoS ONE 2015. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131213

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect PEO-IAA improved grain yield in a concentration dependent manner.
Intervention effect NDGA improved grain yield in a concentration dependent manner.
Intervention effect AIB improved grain yield in a concentration dependent manner.
Association The yield effects depended on developmental stage.
Intervention effect NDGA increased flag-leaf photosynthesis.
Intervention effect AIB increased flag-leaf photosynthesis.
Intervention effect NDGA increased starch content in flag leaves and grains.
Intervention effect AIB increased starch content in flag leaves and grains.
Intervention effect NDGA inhibited expression of an ABA-responsive gene.
Intervention effect NDGA significantly decreased jasmonic acid.
Intervention effect NDGA significantly decreased jasmonic acid-isoleucine.
Mechanism The authors attribute increased rice grain yield to inhibition of jasmonic acid and ethylene biosynthesis.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A small proportion of small seed did not decrease grain yield.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: small proportion of small seedse0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: in no case decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A small proportion of small seeds in a seedlot decreased shoot DM in two of six cases, but in no case decreased percent emergence or grain yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1285

t0
“‘Roblin’ Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–48

Title

Seedling Vigor and Grain Yield of ‘Roblin’ Wheat Affected by Seed Size

Yantai Gan; Elmer H. Stobbe Agronomy Journal 1996. doi:10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800030016x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Uniform large seed increased shoot dry matter in 1990 and 1991.
Intervention effect Uniform large seed did not increase shoot dry matter in 1989.
Intervention effect Uniform large seed increased yield only for early planting in cool soil in 1990.
Intervention effect A small proportion of small seed decreased shoot dry matter in two of six cases.
Intervention effect A small proportion of small seed did not decrease emergence.
Intervention effect After small seeds were removed, reduced-density seedlots yielded equivalently to the original seedlot.
Recommendation The authors recommend retaining small seeds in commercially cleaned wheat seedlots.
Recommendation The authors recommend reducing seeding rate when uniform large seeds are available.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation caused no significant decrease in soybean grain yield in floodplain soils.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe3
Interactor: weed speciese3weed
Outcome: grain yielde3
Direction: no significant decreasese3
Setting: floodplain soilse3

Verbatim

e3
“The poor control of these weed species does not result in significant interference, causing no significant decreases in grain yield of soybean crops grown in floodplain soils”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1311

Title

Soybean grown in lowland rice areas to reduce weed infestation

Filipe C. Cardoso; Mayra L. Schelter; Jessiane M. Jastrombek; et al. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 2024. doi:10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v28n8e275510

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 mM NaCl did not decrease tomato yield.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: 50 mM NaCl treatmente0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“50 mM NaCl treatment (moderate salt stress) reduced the chlorophyll content, increased the carotenoid and lycopene content, and accelerated tomato color transition without decreasing yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–489

Title

NaCl promotes tomato fruit coloring by relieving SlSR3‐induced transcriptional inhibition of lycopene synthesis‐related genes

Xuemei Hou; Tong Wang; Yihua Li; et al. The Plant Journal 2025. doi:10.1111/tpj.70450

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect 50 mM NaCl reduced tomato fruit chlorophyll content.
Intervention effect 50 mM NaCl increased tomato carotenoid and lycopene content.
Intervention effect 50 mM NaCl accelerated tomato color transition.
Intervention effect NaCl downregulated CAMTA5/SR3.
Intervention effect SlSR3 knockout accelerated chlorophyll degradation and carotenoid and lycopene accumulation in tomato fruit.
Intervention effect SlSR3 knockout upregulated PPH, PSY2, PDS and ZDS genes in tomato fruit.
Intervention effect SlSR3 overexpression had the opposite coloring effect.
Intervention effect NaCl decreased chlorophyll and increased carotenoids in wild type and OE-sr3 fruit, but not sr3 mutant fruit.
Intervention effect NaCl upregulated PPH, PSY2, PDS and ZDS in wild type and OE-sr3 fruit, but not sr3 mutant fruit.
Mechanism SlSR3 directly bound PSY2 and ZDS promoters through its CG-1 domain, downregulating both genes.
Mechanism NaCl reversed SlSR3 transcriptional inhibition of PSY2 and ZDS, upregulating both.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics