Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B did not significantly decrease the wheat economic coefficient.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: Enhanced UV-B radiatione0
Outcome: economic coefficiente0
Direction: note0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Enhanced UV-B radiation significantly decreased the wheat bio-productivity and yield, but not the economic coefficient”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118

Title

Effect of Enhanced UV-B Radiation on Wheat Yield and Yield Formation

Wei Yong-lin Agricultural Meteorology 2001

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain yield did not decrease under lower chemical nitrogen treatments relative to conventional nitrogen.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: lowered chemical nitrogen with and without manuree0
Outcome: rice grain yieldse0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Comparator: conven-tional chemical nitrogene0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared with the conven-tional chemical nitrogen, rice grain yields in all treatments with lowered chemical nitrogen with and without manure did not decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1496

Title

Rice Yield, Nitrogen Use Efficiency(NUE) and Nitrogen Leaching Losses as Affected by Long-term Combined Applications of Manure and Chemical Fertilizers in Yellow River Irrigated Region of Ningxia, China

Liu Ru-lian Nongye huanjing kexue xuebao 2015

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Nitrogen use efficiency was 5.2 percentage points higher under a lower nitrogen treatment.
Intervention effect Nitrogen use efficiency was 1.9 percentage points higher under a lower nitrogen treatment.
Intervention effect Reduced chemical nitrogen combined with manure significantly decreased surface water nitrogen concentration and leaching losses at multiple depths.
Intervention effect At 20 cm, total nitrogen leaching losses were 9.99% lower than conventional chemical nitrogen.
Intervention effect At 20 cm, total nitrogen leaching losses were 16% lower than conventional chemical nitrogen.
Intervention effect At 100 cm, total nitrogen leaching losses were 17.9% lower than conventional nitrogen.
Intervention effect At 100 cm, total nitrogen leaching losses were 9.3% lower than conventional nitrogen.
Intervention effect Combined manure and chemical fertilizer reduced apparent nitrogen losses by 12.1% at the same nitrogen level relative to conventional nitrogen.
Intervention effect Combined manure and chemical fertilizer reduced apparent nitrogen losses by 12.5% relative to reduced chemical nitrogen alone.
Recommendation The authors recommend 195 kg chemical nitrogen with 45 kg manure nitrogen to maintain rice yield while reducing pollution.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection of six soyabean cultivars with PStV caused no significant decrease in plant height, seed or seed yield for any cultivar.

Taxon: soyabeane5
Material: 6 soyabean cultivarse5
Treatment: Infectione5
Interactor: peanut stripe potyviruse0pathogen
Outcome: plant height, seed or seed yielde5
Direction: no significant decreasee5
Qualifier: for any cultivare5
Setting: field tests at Byron, Georgia, USAe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Spread of peanut stripe potyvirus (PStV) from groundnut to soyabean and the yield effects on soyabean were determined in field tests at Byron, Georgia, USA”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155

e5
“Infection of 6 soyabean cultivars caused no significant decrease in plant height, seed or seed yield for any cultivar”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–730

Title

Spread of Peanut Stripe Virus from Peanut to Soybean and Yield Effects on Soybean

A. G. Gillaspie Plant Disease 1991. doi:10.1094/pd-75-1157

Other claims from this paper (4)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the dripper installation depth from 25 to 35 cm gave a non-significant 11.2% decrease in sugarcane yield.

Taxon: sugarcanee3
Treatment: increasing the dripper installation depth from 25 to 35 cme4
Outcome: yielde4
Direction: decreasee4
Value: 11.2 %e4

Verbatim

e3
“quantity and quality of sugarcane yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–931

e4
“The results illustrated that with increasing the dripper installation depth from 25 to 35 cm in average, soil moisture increased (4.4 %) and soil salinity and nitrate decreased by 17.5 and 11 % respectively, which also resulted in 11.2 % non-significant decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1204

Title

Determination of the optimum depth for subsurface dripping irrigation of sugarcane under crop residue management

Dorsa Namdarian; Saeid Boroomand-Nasab; Aram Gorooei; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2024. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109026

Other claims from this paper (18)

Association Increasing the dripper installation depth from 25 to 35 cm increased soil moisture by 4.4%.
Association Increasing the dripper installation depth from 25 to 35 cm decreased soil salinity by 17.5%.
Association Increasing the dripper installation depth from 25 to 35 cm decreased soil nitrate by 11%.
Intervention effect Mulch saved soil moisture by 18.4% at 0-30 cm depth compared with residue incineration.
Intervention effect Mulch saved soil moisture by 5.7% at 30-60 cm depth compared with residue incineration.
Intervention effect Mulch saved soil moisture by 5.3% at 60-90 cm depth compared with residue incineration.
Intervention effect Mulch decreased soil salinity by 27.2% at 0-30 cm depth compared with residue incineration.
Intervention effect Mulch decreased soil salinity by 22.9% at 30-60 cm depth compared with residue incineration.
Intervention effect Mulch decreased soil salinity by 21.9% at 60-90 cm depth compared with residue incineration.
Intervention effect Mulch decreased soil nitrate by 25.6% at 0-30 cm depth compared with residue incineration.
Intervention effect Mulch decreased soil nitrate by 18.2% at 30-60 cm depth compared with residue incineration.
Intervention effect Mulch decreased soil nitrate by 14.1% at 60-90 cm depth compared with residue incineration.
Intervention effect ID2 (25 cm) under M1 gave a higher sugarcane yield of 132.6 t ha –1 than the other installation depths.
Intervention effect ID2 under M1 gave a higher total biomass of 231.1 t ha –1 than the other installation depths.
Intervention effect ID2 under M1 gave a higher irrigation water productivity of 6.4 kg m –3 than the other installation depths.
Association ID3 (35 cm) showed higher soil moisture levels.
Observation ID2 provided soil moisture at field capacity over the growing season.
Recommendation A dripper installation depth of ID2 under M1 is recommended to promote moisture conservation and salinity avoidance in sugarcane.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average yields in farmer fields and cultivar trials did not decrease despite declining yield potential.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Outcome: average yields in farmer fields and cultivar trialse0
Direction: not decreasede0

Verbatim

e0
“average yields in farmer fields and cultivar trials have not decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1138

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84

Title

Simultaneous changes in climate and management explain yield trends in a major maize system in Europe

Gabriele Rolando; Fernando Aramburu-Merlos; Francesco Ferrero; et al. Field Crops Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2026.110545

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 34% reduction in N rate did not result in yield penalties or a decrease in grain size of malting barley.

Taxon: Malting Barleyt0
Treatment: 34% reduction in N ratee0
Outcome: yield penalties or a decrease in grain sizee0
Direction: did not result ine0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“in Malting Barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–43

e0
“The results showed that although a 34% reduction in N rate did not result in yield penalties or a decrease in grain size, it did have a negative impact on grain protein content (GPC)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1170

Title

Optimizing Sustainability in Malting Barley: A Practical Approach to Nitrogen Management for Enhanced Environmental, Agronomic, and Economic Benefits

Petros Vahamidis; Angeliki Stefopoulou; Vassilis Kotoulas Agriculture 2023. doi:10.3390/agriculture13122272

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect A 34% reduction in N rate had a negative impact on grain protein content of malting barley.
Intervention effect CRF + Nitro reduced CF of malting barley by approximately 30% compared with the control.
Intervention effect CRF + Nitro increased N agronomic efficiency of malting barley by 51.5% compared with the control.
Intervention effect CRF + Nitro increased net profit of malting barley by 7.1% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Excluding N fertilisation reduced total GHG emissions of malting barley by 68.5% to 74.3%.
Intervention effect Excluding N fertilisation reduced CF of malting barley by 53.8% to 67.1%.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD values, electron transport rate and PSII quantum yield of blue oak did not show a strong decrease during the summer drought.

Taxon: Quercus douglasiiQuercus douglasiie0
Outcome: SPAD values, electron transport rate (ETR) and quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII)e3
Qualifier: did not show a strong decrease during the summer droughte3

Verbatim

e0
“Deciduous blue oaks, Quercus douglasii Hook. and Arn.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–226

e3
“SPAD values, electron transport rate (ETR) and quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) did not show a strong decrease during the summer drought”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1468

Title

Seasonal trends in photosynthesis and electron transport during the Mediterranean summer drought in leaves of deciduous oaks

J. L. Osuna; D. D. Baldocchi; H. Kobayashi; et al. Tree Physiology 2015. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpv023

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited irrigation alone did not decrease peach yield compared with the control crop management.

Taxon: peachPrunus persicae1
Material: cv. Californiae1
Treatment: limited irrigation alonee3
Outcome: yielde3
Direction: without any decreasee3
Comparator: control crop managemente3
Setting: southern Italye1

Verbatim

e1
“carried out on a late ripening peach (cv. California) growing in a typicalMediterranean horticultural area (from southern Italy)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1089

e3
“Compared to the control crop management (hail net coverage, soil tillage and full irrigation), limited irrigation alone was able to slightly increase WUEI thanks to the reduction of water supply without any decrease of yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1884

Title

Innovative Soil Management and Micro-Climate Modulation for Saving Water in Peach Orchards

Pasquale Campi; Liliana Gaeta; Marcello Mastrorilli; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2020. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.01052

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Shading hail-net reduced air temperature by 1 °C in the peach canopy.
Intervention effect Shading hail-net reduced wind speed by 57%.
Intervention effect Shading hail-net reduced solar radiation by 32%.
Intervention effect Shading hail-net increased relative air humidity by 9.5%.
Intervention effect Limited irrigation alone slightly increased irrigation water use efficiency compared with the control crop management.
Intervention effect The combination of shading hail net, mulching and limited irrigation saved seasonal irrigation water volume by 25%.
Intervention effect The combination of shading hail net, mulching and limited irrigation increased final peach yield by 36%.
Intervention effect The combination of shading hail net, mulching and limited irrigation increased WUEI by 53%.
Intervention effect Net shading and soil mulching together mitigated soil water stress induced by limited irrigation.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the favourable year 2001, sprouting damage had no decrease effect on yield despite a significant effect on field emergence.

Taxon: SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Material: Gabo, Migo and Wanade3
Treatment: seed sprouting damagee4
Outcome: elements of the structure of yield and the yielde4
Direction: no decreasee4
Qualifier: In the favourable year 2001e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“YIELD OF SPRING TRITICALE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84

e4
“In the favourable year 2001, in spite of a signifi cant effect of seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence, the emergence level was so high that no decrease in the investigated elements of the structure of yield and the yield was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–982

e3
“The research covered three cultivars: Gabo, Migo and Wanad”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–280

Title

THE EFFECT OF SEED SPROUTING DAMAGE ON FIELD EMERGENCE AND YIELD OF SPRING TRITICALE

Moś; Wójtowicz Journal of Central European Agriculture 2005. doi:10.5513/jcea.v5i4.223

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 70% G, yield did not decrease significantly relative to G.

Taxon: winter wheat-summer maizee1
Treatment: 70%G-levele0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: not decreasede0
Comparator: G levele0

Verbatim

e0
“70%G-level annual N2O emissions, when compared with the G level, had been reduced by 40% to 48%, while the yield has not decreased significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1338

e1
“winter wheat-summer maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–199

Title

Insecticidas del suelo, retrospectiva y perspectivas

Fiedrich Kerz-Möhlendick Fruticultura profesional 1991. doi:10.13227/j.hjkx.202005151

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observation N2O emission peaks appeared 5-16 days after fertilization and after rainfall.
Association N2O flux was significantly positively correlated with soil temperature.
Association N2O flux was significantly positively correlated with NH4+-N content.
Intervention effect The 70% GSB treatment had the lowest N2O emissions in wheat season, maize season and annually.
Intervention effect At the same nitrogen level, straw return increased N2O emissions.
Intervention effect At the same nitrogen level, straw and biochar reduced N2O emissions.
Intervention effect Straw return significantly increased crop yield.
Intervention effect Straw and biochar significantly increased crop yield.
Intervention effect At 70% G, annual N2O emissions were reduced by 40% to 48% relative to G.
Recommendation The authors recommend a 30% nitrogen reduction with straw and biochar to retain high yields and reduce N2O emissions.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics