Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

2,653 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 397 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 2 earlier · 1930s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Se0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weight per paniclee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 9.91%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6S, they significantly increased by 20.78%, 9.91%, 16.19%, 9.28%, 5.01%, and 4.14%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1825

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bio-inoculant and fortified lignite fly ash application significantly reduced blast severity (10.32, 13.97 and 14.87 per cent at 30, 45 and 60 DAT) relative to control.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: combined application of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilise2
Interactor: blaste1pathogen
Second interactor: Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2biocontrol_agent
Outcome: blast disease severitye1
Direction: reducede1
Value: 10.32, 13.97 and 14.87 per cente1
Comparator: controle4

Verbatim

e0
“Brown leaf spot and blast are the major diseases of rice in Tamil Nadu”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–70

e1
“significantly reduced brown leaf spot disease severity 9.03, 11.01 and 12.78 per cent at 30, 45 and 60 DAT and blast disease severity of 10.32, 13.97 and 14.87 per cent at 30, 45 and 60 DAT, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1062

e2
“combined application of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis as seed treatment @ 10g/kg of seed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–571

e4
“All ecofriendly components treated plants significantly decrease the diseases incidence and increase the grain yield as compare to control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1294

Title

Evaluation of bio inoculants fortified lignite fly ash against brown leaf spot and blast diseases of rice in Cauvery delta region of Tamil Nadu

D. John Christopher; D. E. Kavi Newton Plant Disease Research 2017

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Combined bio-inoculant and fortified lignite fly ash application significantly reduced brown leaf spot severity (9.03, 11.01 and 12.78 per cent at 30, 45 and 60 DAT) relative to control.
Intervention effect The combined bio-inoculant treatment gave the maximum rice grain yield (32 g/plant) of all treatments.
Intervention effect All ecofriendly components significantly decreased rice disease incidence relative to control.
Intervention effect All ecofriendly components increased rice grain yield relative to control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bio-inoculant and fortified lignite fly ash application significantly reduced brown leaf spot severity (9.03, 11.01 and 12.78 per cent at 30, 45 and 60 DAT) relative to control.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: combined application of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilise2
Interactor: brown leaf spote1pathogen
Second interactor: Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2biocontrol_agent
Outcome: brown leaf spot disease severitye1
Direction: reducede1
Value: 9.03, 11.01 and 12.78 per cente1
Comparator: controle4

Verbatim

e0
“Brown leaf spot and blast are the major diseases of rice in Tamil Nadu”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–70

e1
“significantly reduced brown leaf spot disease severity 9.03, 11.01 and 12.78 per cent at 30, 45 and 60 DAT and blast disease severity of 10.32, 13.97 and 14.87 per cent at 30, 45 and 60 DAT, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1062

e2
“combined application of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis as seed treatment @ 10g/kg of seed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–571

e4
“All ecofriendly components treated plants significantly decrease the diseases incidence and increase the grain yield as compare to control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1294

Title

Evaluation of bio inoculants fortified lignite fly ash against brown leaf spot and blast diseases of rice in Cauvery delta region of Tamil Nadu

D. John Christopher; D. E. Kavi Newton Plant Disease Research 2017

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Combined bio-inoculant and fortified lignite fly ash application significantly reduced blast severity (10.32, 13.97 and 14.87 per cent at 30, 45 and 60 DAT) relative to control.
Intervention effect The combined bio-inoculant treatment gave the maximum rice grain yield (32 g/plant) of all treatments.
Intervention effect All ecofriendly components significantly decreased rice disease incidence relative to control.
Intervention effect All ecofriendly components increased rice grain yield relative to control.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics