Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S2 soil salt did not significantly lower seed yield relative to S1.

Taxon: Oil Sunflowert0
Treatment: S2 treatmente0
Outcome: seed yielde0
Direction: no significant decreasee0
Comparator: S1 treatmente0

Verbatim

t0
“Oil Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–99

e0
“Compared to S1 treatment (the salt concentration of soil was 1.3-1.6 g/kg),there was no significant decrease of seed yield under S2 treatment (the salt concentration of soil was 2.9-3.6 g/kg)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–442

Title

Coupling Effects of Salt and Fertilizer Application on Growth and Ion Distribution of Oil Sunflower in Coastal Mudflat of northerb Jiangsu

Zhaopu Liu Soils 2010

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Seed yield decreased as soil salt increased under S3.
Intervention effect Seed yield increased with nitrogen and phosphorus additions.
Association The effects of nitrogen and phosphorus increased as soil salt increased.
Intervention effect Root, stem, leaf and disc Na+ and Cl- contents rose significantly with soil salt.
Intervention effect K+ and Ca2+ changed slightly as soil salt increased.
Intervention effect Nitrogen and phosphorus additions decreased Na+ and Cl- contents across organs at a fixed soil salt concentration.
Intervention effect Nitrogen and phosphorus additions increased K+ and Ca2+ at a fixed soil salt concentration.
Mechanism The authors infer that fertilization promoted selective nutrient ion transport and restrained harmful salt ions.
Recommendation The authors recommend nitrogen and phosphorus to improve saline tolerance and seed yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen decreased grains per panicle by 2.5%, without a significant difference.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Nitrogent1
Outcome: grains per paniclee0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 2.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield,effective panicles and grains per panicle decrease by 4.9%,2.4% and 2.5% respectively.The difference did not reach significant level”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–510

t0
“Rice Shennong 265”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76

t1
“Nitrogen”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19

Title

Effects of Nitrogen on Yield and N Use Efficiency of Super Rice Shennong 265

Sun GuoCai 2011

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen to 147kg/hm2 increased seed setting rate by 4.7%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen to 147kg/hm2 increased 1000-grain weight by 2.4%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen decreased yield by 4.9%, without a significant difference.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen decreased effective panicles by 2.4%, without a significant difference.
Observation Leaf, stem and panicle nitrogen content and accumulation decreased across growth stages.
Observation Nitrogen harvest index, physical efficiency and agronomic efficiency increased.
Observation Partial productivity increased.
Observation Nitrogen remobilization to panicles increased.
Recommendation The authors recommend reducing nitrogen fertilizer for optimal yield structure and nitrogen efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed cover crops did not significantly increase yield.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment: Mixtures of Brassicaceae and Fabaceaee0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: did not significantly decrease SVW or increasee0
Comparator: bare soile0

Verbatim

e0
“Mixtures of Brassicaceae and Fabaceae sowed at these densities resulted in an intermediate SMN level between those in sole crops and the bare soil and they did not significantly decrease SVW or increase yields.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1775–1985

e1
“sunflower yields after cover crops”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1648

Title

Ecosystem Services Provided by Cover Crops and Biofumigation in Sunflower Cultivation

Neila Ait Kaci Ahmed; Benoit Galaup; Jérémy Desplanques; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12010120

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Purple vetch increased soil mineral nitrogen before sunflower sowing in 2019.
Intervention effect Fodder radish reduced sunflower wilt severity overall at 80 days except in 2019.
Intervention effect Purple vetch reduced sunflower wilt severity in 2017 and 2020.
Intervention effect Sunflower yield after purple vetch was higher than after bare soil in 2020 by 0.77 t ha−1.
Intervention effect Mixed cover crops produced intermediate soil mineral nitrogen.
Intervention effect Mixed cover crops did not significantly reduce sunflower wilt.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant decrease in photosynthesis ability of the fourth leaf or chlorophyll content was seen under 12 plants m −2 compared with 7.5 plants m −2.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage: fourth leavee0
Treatment: 12 plants m −2e1
Outcome: photosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll contente0
Direction: no significant decreasee1
Comparator: 7.5 plants m −2e1

Verbatim

e0
“The photosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content both decreased with increasing plant density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1727

e1
“but no significant decrease was observed under 12 plants m −2 compared to 7.5 plants m −2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1818

t0
“high density cotton”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–101

Title

Optimized canopy photosynthetic capacity increases sink/source ratio and yield of high density cotton sowed after wheat harvest

Yuan Chen; Chengzhi Xie; Shu Dong; et al. Industrial Crops and Products 2025. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121568

Other claims from this paper (15)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

days to flowering changed by 6.5% over breeding years.

Taxon: Durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durumt0
Outcome: days to floweringe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 6.5%e0
Setting: Ethiopiat0

Verbatim

t0
“Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var.durum L.) in Ethiopia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–119

e0
“6.5% decrease in days to flowering and a 1.0% extension in days to maturity were statistically nonsignificant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1208

Title

Genetic Improvement in Grain yield and Yield Related Traits of Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var.durum L.) in Ethiopia

Mekuria Temtme; Hussein Mohammed; Tesfaye Letta International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering 2018. doi:10.31695/ijasre.2018.32838

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Varieties differed significantly across quantitative traits, protein content and protein harvest at both locations.
Association Grain yield changed by 2705.92kg ha-1 to 3766.67.4kg ha-1 over breeding years.
Association grain yield changed by 22.24 kg ha-1 year-1 over breeding years.
Association relative genetic gain changed by 0.83% year-1 over breeding years.
Association spike length changed by 11.4% over breeding years.
Association spikelets spike-1 changed by 6.7% over breeding years.
Association protein content changed by 17.9% over breeding years.
Association protein yield ha-1 changed by 31.2% over breeding years.
Association grains spikelet-1 changed by 41.1% over breeding years.
Association number of grains spike-1 changed by 32.9% over breeding years.
Association thousand grain weight changed by 22.3% over breeding years.
Association grain filling period changed by 17.8% over breeding years.
Association seed growth rate changed by 23.9% over breeding years.
Association grain yield production rate changed by 40.1% over breeding years.
Association harvest index changed by 7.9% over breeding years.
Association days to maturity changed by 1.0% over breeding years.
Observation Plant height, tillers, biomass production rate, hectoliter weight and biomass yield remained unchanged over improvement years.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-dressing fungicides did not significantly decrease the final incidence of dead plants.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment: seed-dressing fungicidese5
Outcome: final incidence of dead plantse6
Direction: decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Fusarium wilt of chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–50

e5
“Both seed-dressing fungicides significantly increased seedling emergence in the wilt-infected plot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1168

e6
“but neither significantly decreased the final incidence of dead plants, or increased the grain yield in the infected plot or the farmers’ fields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1314

Title

Sources of resistance to Fusarium wilt of chickpea in Sudan

Mohamed Elfatih Khalid Ali; Shinobu Inanaga; Yukihiro Sugimoto Phytopathologia Mediterranea 2002. doi:10.1400/14506

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 75% versus 100% water requirements, tuber number, fresh weight and yield decreased without significance.

Taxon: Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment: 75% of water requirementse0
Outcome: number of tubers/plant, tuber fresh weight and tuber yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: 100% of water requirementse0

Verbatim

e0
“Jerusalem artichoke plants irrigated with 75% of water requirements gave insignificant decrease in number of tubers/plant, tuber fresh weight and tuber yield than the treatment received 100% of water requirements.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1893

Title

Foliar Application of Glycine Betaine and Potassium Silicate and Its Effect on Growth Performance of Jerusalem Artichoke Grown on Calcareous Soil Under Water Stress Conditions

Nashwa Abo El-Fadel; Mostafa Shama Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches/Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches 2020. doi:10.21608/jalexu.2020.163749

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Increasing irrigation from 50% to 100% significantly increased vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Increasing irrigation significantly increased tuber yield and its components.
Intervention effect Increasing irrigation significantly improved tuber quality.
Intervention effect Foliar antitranspirants increased irrigation efficiency.
Intervention effect Potassium silicate was more effective than glycine betaine at 50% ET C.
Intervention effect Potassium silicate with full irrigation gave the best plant height, main stem number and fresh weight.
Intervention effect Dry matter percentage was not significantly affected by irrigation and foliar treatments.
Intervention effect Potassium silicate at 100% ETc gave the highest tuber yield in both seasons.
Association Irrigation level interacted strongly with foliar treatments for tuber yield.
Intervention effect At 75% ETc, potassium silicate gave the highest average tuber yield per feddan.
Intervention effect The 50% irrigation level gave the lowest mean tuber yields versus control.
Association Irrigation and foliar treatment interaction significantly affected tuber potassium content.
Association Irrigation and foliar treatment interaction did not significantly affect tuber N, P and carbohydrate content.
Association First-season tuber inulin content was an exception to the nonsignificant composition results.
Intervention effect At 50% ET C, crop water use efficiency doubled versus 100% ET C.
Association Water use efficiency increased as irrigation level declined.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying against late blight did not significantly reduce late blight occurrence.

Taxon: BIOPOTATOESt0
Treatment: liquid spraye0
Interactor: Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome: occurrence of late blighte0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans) did not significantly decrease neither occurrence of late blight or the yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–528

t0
“BIOPOTATOES”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36

Title

ALTERNTIVE PROTECTION OF BIOPOTATOES IN ORGANIC FARMING

Jaroslav Tomášek; Petr Dvořák Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2010

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Botanical water extracts did not significantly reduce Colorado potato beetle adult attack versus control.
Observation Botanical extracts showed a trend of lower egg laying.
Observation Botanical extracts showed a trend of lower larval occurrence.
Intervention effect Spraying against late blight did not significantly decrease yield.
Observation Organic potato production represented 0,2 % of total Czech potato production.
Recommendation Authors propose water extracts for potato protection and yield and quality improvement.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mandatory second fungicide application did not significantly decrease disease severity or AUDPC in southern areas.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Treatment: mandatory second fungicide application 14 days after the first applicatione3
Outcome: disease severity or AUDPCe3
Direction: did not significantly decreasee3
Comparator: treatments without the mandatory applicatione3
Setting: southern arease3

Verbatim

e0
“Management of Cercospora leaf spot, caused by Cercospora beticola, is necessary for the economic production of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–137

e3
“The mandatory second fungicide application 14 days after the first application for southern areas did not significantly decrease disease severity or AUDPC, or improve root yield or recoverable sucrose compared with treatments without the mandatory application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1284

Title

Improving the Cercospora Leaf Spot Management Model for Sugar Beet in Minnesota and North Dakota

J. Khan; L. E. del Río; R. Nelson; et al. Plant Disease 2007. doi:10.1094/pdis-91-9-1105

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease ear length, ear diameter or rows per ear of maize.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome: ear length, ear diameter, rows per eare0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Setting: Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103

e0
“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics