View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The 90 kg P/ha dose significantly decrease d seed yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “highest dose of phosphorus (90 kg P/ha) resulted in significant decrease in seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–787 t0 “RADISH (RAPHANUS SATIVUS L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Raising zinc to 200 ppm significantly decrease d fruit yield .
Treatmentzinc concentration to 200 ppm e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “raising zinc concentration to 200 ppm revealed a significant decrease in fruit yield /fed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–663 t0 “fennel ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–88 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Significant decrease of grain number per panicle and seed setting percent under pure organic manure cultivation.
Outcomegrain number per panicle and seed setting percent e3 Verbatim
e2 “The results showed that grain yield of super hybrid rice reached to 8 586 kg/hm~2 under POMC,which was near to the local yield potential of the test variety and only was decrease d by 1.17% compared to chemical fertilizer treatment(CK) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–423 e3 “The bigger proportion of secondary tillers and the significant decrease of grain number per panicle and seed setting percent were main reasons that yield decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–587 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d harvest index.
TreatmentDrought stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress effect on harvest index showed a significant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3326–3394 t0 “millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A 50 % decrease in the recommended dose of N and P decrease d sorghum fodder yield from 108.54 to 75.70 q/ha.
Treatmentdecrease in RD of N and P at the tune of 25 % , 50 % and 75 % e2 Verbatim
e1 “Application of recommended dose of N and P increased the fodder yield of sorghum from 41.11 to 108.54 q ha -1 significantly over absolute control and all other treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–178 e2 “A decrease in RD of N and P at the tune of 25 % , 50 % and 75 % decrease d the fodder yield significantly from 108.54 to 87.64., from 108.54 to 75.70. and from 108.54 to 66.32 respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–367 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A 75 % decrease in the recommended dose of N and P decrease d sorghum fodder yield from 108.54 to 66.32 q/ha.
Treatmentdecrease in RD of N and P at the tune of 25 % , 50 % and 75 % e2 Verbatim
e1 “Application of recommended dose of N and P increased the fodder yield of sorghum from 41.11 to 108.54 q ha -1 significantly over absolute control and all other treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–178 e2 “A decrease in RD of N and P at the tune of 25 % , 50 % and 75 % decrease d the fodder yield significantly from 108.54 to 87.64., from 108.54 to 75.70. and from 108.54 to 66.32 respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–367 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher doses of 16–48 l/m2 significantly decrease d crop yield of both crops.
Treatmenthigher doses (16–48 l/m2) e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “higher doses (16–48 l/m2) showed a reliable decrease in the yield of both crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–566 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cu deficiency decrease d yield and all quality traits of onion.
Outcomeyield and all quality traits e1 Verbatim
e1 “Cu deficiency (control) resulted in a significant decrease in yield and all quality traits of onion plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–884 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly decrease d total fruit yield .
Treatmentdeficit irrigation e0 Outcometotal fruit yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “deficit irrigation led to a significant decrease in total fruit yield and number of total fruits per tree. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–801 t0 “Pomegranate ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–51 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed irrigation significantly decrease d grain yield .
TreatmentDelay in irrigation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Delay in irrigation with subsequent increase in drought stress severity resulted in a significant decrease in grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1011 t0 “Corn (Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.