Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For Kent, removal of all primary, secondary or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots.

Taxon: StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Material: Kente5
Treatment: removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary budse5
Outcome: yielde5
Direction: did not significantly decreasee5
Comparator: control plotse5

Verbatim

t0
“Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62

e5
“For ‘Seneca’ and ‘Kent’, removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–965

Title

Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal: Implications for Managing the Strawberry Bud Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Greg English-Loeb; Marvin Pritts; Joe Kovach; et al. Journal of Economic Entomology 1999. doi:10.1093/jee/92.4.915

Other claims from this paper (9)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial populations of several named nematodes did not decrease cereal yield.

Taxon: cerealse0
Interactor: Tylenchus Bastiane0pest
Outcome: yield of cerealse0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Qualifier: Paratylenchus Micoletzky, Pratylenchus minyus Sher and Allen, P. crenatus Loof, P. penetrans Chitwood and Oteifa, Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus Golden and H. digonicus Perrye0

Verbatim

e0
“initial populations of Tylenchus Bastian, Paratylenchus Micoletzky, Pratylenchus minyus Sher and Allen, P. crenatus Loof, P. penetrans Chitwood and Oteifa, Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus Golden and H. digonicus Perry did not decrease yield of cereals”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–287

Title

Migratory plant parasitic nematodes as pests of cereals

R. K. JONES Annals of Applied Biology 1979. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1979.tb03871.x

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe stress, bacteroid proline catabolism had no significant effect on the drought-related seed yield decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome: drought imposed decrease in seed yielde0
Direction: no significant effecte0
Qualifier: when stress was severee0

Verbatim

e0
“when stress was severe there was no significant effect of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on drought imposed decrease in seed yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1451

e1
“When water stress was mild, soybean plants inoculated with bacteria unable to catabolize proline”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1173

Title

Effect of disabling bacteroid proline catabolism on the response of soybeans to repeated drought stress

Peter F. Straub; Georgia Shearer; Paul H.S. Reynolds; et al. Journal of Experimental Botany 1997. doi:10.1093/jxb/48.6.1299

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer did not decrease edamame yield or quality in any of the tested parameters.

Taxon: edamamee0
Treatment: N fertilizere4
Outcome: yield or qualitye4
Direction: decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“for edamame in the mid-Atlantic coastal plain system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–318

e4
“None of the tested parameters indicated that N fertilizer decreased yield or quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1111

Title

Edamame Yield and Quality Response to Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilizers

Keren Brooks; Mark Reiter; Bo Zhang; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13071865

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing 0.5% CMV-infected seed did not significantly decrease lupin grain yield.

Taxon: narrow‐leafed lupinse0
Treatment: sowing 0.5% infected seede3
Interactor: cucumber mosaic viruscucumber mosaic cucumoviruse1pathogen
Outcome: yielde3
Direction: did not significantly decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“narrow‐leafed lupins ( Lupinus angustifolius )”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–87

e1
“sowing seed with 5% and 0.5% cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) infection”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–195

e3
“The spread of CMV infection resulting from sowing 0.5% infected seed did not significantly decrease yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–881

Title

Further studies on cucumber mosaic virus infection of narrow‐leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius): seed‐borne infection, aphid transmission, spread and effects on grain yield

R. A. C. JONES; W. PROUDLOVE Annals of Applied Biology 1991. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1991.tb05632.x

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation depths did not affect chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio.

Taxon: pineapple plantsAnanas comosust0
Treatment: irrigation depthse0
Outcome: chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio (RFd)e0
Direction: not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Quantum yield of photosystem II (Yield), photochemical quenching (qP), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) and chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio (RFd) were not influenced by irrigation depths.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1002

t0
“pineapple plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44

Title

Photochemical efficiency in pineapple plants under saline water irrigation

Cleiton Fernando Barbosa Brito; Varley Andrade Fonseca; Marcelo Rocha dos Santos; et al. Ambiente e Agua - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Science 2020. doi:10.4136/ambi-agua.2564

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observation Pineapple quantum efficiency fluctuated during the crop cycle and was below ideal, especially at its end.
Intervention effect Irrigation depths did not affect quantum yield, photochemical quenching, or non-photochemical quenching.
Intervention effect Saline irrigation at 3.6 dS m-1 did not affect energy used for pineapple photosynthesis.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease total dry matter.

Taxon: mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]Vigna radiatat0
Treatment: basal 25% defoliatione0
Outcome: TDMe0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840

t0
“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107

Title

Effect of defoliation on growth, reproductive characters and yield in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek].

Alam Mondal, Monjurul; Ali Fakir, Md Solaiman; Ismail, Mohd Razi; et al. Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) 2011

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Greater defoliation decreased leaf area and total dry matter production across seasons and genotypes.
Intervention effect Defoliation reduced source size and flower production.
Intervention effect Defoliation decreased flower production.
Intervention effect Defoliation lowered pod and seed yields.
Intervention effect Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease seed yield per plant.
Observation High yielding genotypes had greater compensation for source loss than low yielding genotypes.
Intervention effect Defoliation above 25% from either canopy position significantly reduced total dry matter and seed yield.
Intervention effect Top defoliation caused greater yield reduction than basal defoliation.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased IVDMD does not result in a decrease in forage yield.

Taxon: perennial grassese0
Treatment: increased IVDMDe6
Outcome: forage yielde6
Direction: does not result in a decreasee6

Verbatim

e0
“to develop perennial grasses adapted to the mid-continental USA with improved forage quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–213

e6
“Because increased IVDMD generally does not result in a decrease in forage yield, this results in a net increase in animal production per hectare of land”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1407

Title

Improving grassland profitability in the Mid-continental USA by breeding for improved forage digestibility: lessons learned and applications to South American grasslands

Kenneth Paul Vogel; Cesar Heraclides Behling Miranda Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2009. doi:10.1590/s1516-35982009001300017

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil palm yield did not decrease significantly in intercropping relative to similar monocropping.

Taxon: oil palme0
Treatment: intercropping systeme0
Outcome: oil palm yieldse0
Direction: no significant decreasee0
Comparator: monocropping systemse0

Verbatim

e0
“oil palm yields in the intercropping system showed no significant decrease compared to monocropping systems with relatively the same age and production input”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1337

Title

Potential of Intercropping of Oil Palm (E. guineensis Jacq.) and Liberica Coffee (C. liberica L.): A Case Study in Smallholder Plantation

Erick Firmansyah; Arif Umami Journal of Applied Agricultural Science and Technology 2021. doi:10.32530/jaast.v5i2.22

Other claims from this paper (7)

Association Oil palm age was directly proportional to the air–soil temperature and relative humidity difference under canopy.
Observation Oil palm roots dominated at 0 - 30 cm and over coffee roots at all horizontal distances.
Observation Coffee roots were dominant at 31 - 60 cm.
Observation Tap roots extended no further than 30-45 cm below the soil surface.
Observation Oil palm roots dominated 2-3 m from the trunk.
Observation Coffee roots dominated 1-2 m from the trunk.
Intervention effect Coffee production per tree decreased 25-30% in intercropping versus monocropping.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in peanut yield did not affect the production of intercropping benefit.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae1
Outcome: production of intercropping benefite1
Qualifier: due to the larger intercropping advantage and land equivalence ratioe1

Verbatim

e1
“The decrease in peanut yield did not affect the production of intercropping benefit due to the larger intercropping advantage and land equivalence ratio”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1183

Title

Crop Productivity, Economic Advantage, and Photosynthetic Characteristics in a Corn-Peanut Intercropping System

Yanhong Li; Lei Wang; Bin Zhao; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13020509

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Intercropped corn (IM) yielded 59.7% more than single corn (SM) in one of the two seasons.
Intervention effect Intercropped corn (IM) yielded 62.3% more than single corn (SM) in one of the two seasons.
Intervention effect Intercropped peanut (IP) yielded 31.3% less than single peanut (SP) in one of the two seasons.
Intervention effect Intercropped peanut (IP) yielded 32.3% less than single peanut (SP) in one of the two seasons.
Intervention effect IM significantly increased the photosynthetic rate, leaf area and 13C assimilation distribution of summer corn.
Intervention effect IM significantly increased dry matter accumulation of summer corn.
Intervention effect IM increased kernel number and grain yield of summer corn.
Association The yield decrease of intercropped peanut was associated with lower full-pod rate and fewer pods per plant.
Observation Intercropping advantage and land equivalence ratio were larger in the intercropping system.
Intervention effect Corn-peanut intercropping yielded greater economic benefits than monoculture.
Recommendation The peanut-corn intercropping model is useful.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics